skyshadow
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2017
- Messages
- 5,056
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They have their own ejection seat
Their own jet engine
Their own air frame
Their own data link
Their own radar
Their own hud system
Their own mobile mapping system
Their own ground targeting RADAR
What is left
Even israel and Indian cannot produce all those systems.
Because of owj that was the only engine they had develop so far. Iran's problem is not fighter jet now but engine. They have stealth but why do you think 313 looks like a toy Iran needs to develop a bigger engine. When Iran develops a new engine it will explode on the world. Choosing the F-5 was due to engine nothing else.If all this is true then why go for an F5 frame?
I like Iran, but sorry to say...this is a lemon.
A shit plane from1950’s revamped as iranian now. What an embarrassing situation for iran.
But hey, at least it’s not a toy plane like their stealth jet
New Recruit
Aero L-39 Albatros Czechoslovakia in 1960sSimilar unveiling for the same aircraft took place in the US in 1959.
Ok show me one single part of a fighter jet produced by Saudi Arabia locally without foreign aid and assistance .. engine? avionic? landing gear?radar? jet seat?Similar unveiling for the same aircraft took place in the US in 1959.
They have stealth
I am well wisher for Iran and wish them good luck. But if they defend this then i will laugh inside.
Don't convince me there are far more technological savvy people in this forum than me and yes avionics is far more superior than 1960's contrary to the we are in 2018.I don't like Iran but even I'll admit people are being pretty stupid for judging the plane just because it looks like an F-5, even though from a technological standpoint it's much more advanced.