Fafnir
BANNED
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2016
- Messages
- 831
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
You keep saying I have no clue yet apart from posting some photos of what looks to be somewhat dated 90s era panoramics you`ve written nothing nor posted anything that disproves anything that I`ve written.I`ve asked this before and received no response but I`ll ask you again:if it is not a panoramic sight then what else could it possibly be?,I would certainly expect that a "consultant" like yourself who claims to be highly knowledgeable about these systems would have an answer......or perhaps notIt's just a glorified t-72 that's all there is to Karrar and that's what I said in my very first post. is it that difficult to swallow?
what did you prove?
As I said, you have no clue what you are talking about. I mean, how much do you know about panoramic sights, their designs and role?
You literally embarrassed every mbt manufacturer with this statement of yours. Hell, they should take heed from Iran on designing panoramic sights now.
Ukrainians must be curiously looking into your state of the art panoramic sight as all they could come up with until now was this big fat bulky babe.
Now as for your ukrainian sight...,well first off I`m sure a "consultant" like yourself would be only too aware that ukraine is not exactly a world leader,to put it mildly,when it comes to the weapons/military hardware it has on offer,most of it appears to be either copies of soviet era hardware or refurbed/remanufactured soviet era hardware and designs with some upgrades and improvements and an awful lot of whats on offer appears to be nothing more than vaporware,I know this because I downloaded one of their armaments catalogues a couple of years ago,it made for ...shall we say interesting reading and just leave it at that.For instance the ukranian panoramic you posted looks physically to be of almost of the same vintage as the mid-late 90s turms-t right down to its old binocular eye pieces.
Tell you what lets try some pics to attempt to illustrate things:
below is the t90ms commanders station,now on the far left we can clearly see the flat panel screen and underneath it the remote control panel for the panoramic site,now we notice that these are quite separate physically from the body of the sight which is mounted behind the commander
Now here we see the iranian remote mounted viewer,in this case the viewer and controls are actually integrated in one whole unit unlike the two separate systems in the t90ms,certainly not a copy but close cousins without a doubt and in addition we also see a multifunction display next to it just as in the t90ms
"Hell, they should take heed from Iran on designing panoramic sights now"
Well I think the ukrainians certainly should judging from the look of the system you posted.This isnt rocket science iran and russia have simply applied the same design choices that were used in systems like aircraft flirs and optronic submarine masts ie a separate sight/vision system with a remote mounted display and control as opposed to a far bulkier unitary system,personally I think a lot of others will follow their lead both with an integrated rws/panoramic sight and a remote sight controller/integrated display because the advantages are just so...well...dare I say.. obvious....at least to some of us that is.
Now,now SOHEIL lets have some sympathy for the poor girl it cant be easy to be both a PDF "consultant" and a:
crime fighting superhero
That outfit does look like KISS meets disco tho`
Last edited:
