'Iran ready to send peacekeepers to UK'

[longbrained]

That doesn't make sense.

Does war justify the use of nuclear weapons on population centers?

And... what if Iran and Israel get into a war? Would it be justified then?

Wars happen all over the planet, all the time (several wars are ongoing right this moment)... yet only two nuclear weapons have ever been used on civilian populations.

Dear, you do not get it. My Chinese brother, it is not war or peace that justifies the atrocities. The most important thing is that the atrocity has to have been committed by the white man. Then it is justified. If the colored man is as much even defend itself then he has committed unspeakable atrocity of standing up the desires of white man. This has been the case for the past 500 years now. Where have been? We have an author here in Pakistan by the name of Ashfaq Ahmad who in his book outlines how the white men used to live in Indian subcontinent. It is written in that book that any White man in Indian continent could go and kill a local and the max the court of white men's law would do is fine the white man Rs. 1. That is right One rupee, and that is if the white man was to be found guilty by the court if not then he could go with out paying any fine. I am sure you remember about Chinese opium trade and Boxer rebellion etc.

 

[below_freezing]

What do YOU believe is appropriate justice for the atrocities Imperial Japan committed on Asia? Like Unit 731, for example.

WHAT A JOKE. It is your US regime that let Unit 731 go free in exchange for their experimental data. It is sheer hypocrisy for you to mention Unit 731.

Dear, you do not get it. My Chinese brother, it is not war or peace that justifies the atrocities. The most important thing is that the atrocity has to have been committed by the white man. Then it is justified. If the colored man is as much even defend itself then he has committed unspeakable atrocity of standing up the desires of white man. This has been the case for the past 500 years now. Where have been? We have an author here in Pakistan by the name of Ashfaq Ahmad who in his book outlines how the white men used to live in Indian subcontinent. It is written in that book that any White man in Indian continent could go and kill a local and the max the court of white men's law would do is fine the white man Rs. 1. That is right One rupee, and that is if the white man was to be found guilty by the court if not then he could go with out paying any fine. I am sure you remember about Chinese opium trade and Boxer rebellion etc.

It is true. Anglos are justified in anything they do. I believe civilized countries should set up a joint task force to enforce a no-fly zone over Britain and a blockade of Britain in order to stop their regime's forces from cracking down on unarmed minorities.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

If Iran suddenly decided to blow New York up, then that would in no way be justified

Of course, there would be no excuse for that.

My question is, why is Iran any less reasonable then America/China/Russia/UK/Pakistan/India/Israel? What makes them more likely to use it than any other nation?

Is Ahmadinejad a bit nuts? Maybe. But the highest authority in Iran is the supreme Ayatollah, not Ahmadinejad.

 

[gambit]

WHAT A JOKE. It is your US regime that let Unit 731 go free in exchange for their experimental data. It is sheer hypocrisy for you to mention Unit 731.

Answer the question: What were/are the justifications for the atrocities committed by Imperial Japan against Asia?

 

[below_freezing]

Answer the question: What were/are the justifications for the atrocities committed by Imperial Japan against Asia?

There are no justifications for that. There are also no justifications for letting convicted criminals go but the US did just that.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

Answer the question: What were/are the justifications for the atrocities committed by Imperial Japan against Asia?

No justifications at all.

 

[CardSharp]

What the US did with some people associated with that infamous military unit is not the issue.

Of course it's not. It's never the issue when the US is at fault.

 

[gambit]

There are no justifications for that. There are also no justifications for letting convicted criminals go but the US did just that.

Good...Now answer the next question: What would be the appropriate response of justice against the country that created such a weapon and refused to surrender?

 

[gambit]

Of course it's not. It's never the issue when the US is at fault.

Sounds like a coward to me.

 

[888jamie888]

Of course, there would be no excuse for that.

My question is, why is Iran any less reasonable then America/China/Russia/UK/Pakistan/India/Israel? What makes them more likely to use it than any other nation?

Is Amadinejad a bit nuts? Maybe. But the highest authority in Iran is the supreme Ayatollah, not Amedinajad.

Well the fact they won't let in inspectors suggests something is up. They also seem to really hate the west. I seem to recall him calling Britain evil.
But he is not the decision maker? I didn't know that, that changes things then.

 

[below_freezing]

Good...Now answer the next question: What would be the appropriate response of justice against the country that created such a weapon and refused to surrender?

Bringing the specific people who created these weapons and refused to surrender to justice in a court of law. Oh wait the US doesn't believe in the rule of law. So yeah indiscriminately kill 300,000 civilians with nuclear weapons and force the rest of the world to defend itself by also getting nuclear weapons.

 

[gambit]

It is true. Anglos are justified in anything they do. I believe civilized countries should set up a joint task force to enforce a no-fly zone over Britain and a blockade of Britain in order to stop their regime's forces from cracking down on unarmed minorities.

Sure...We could do the same for Taiwan, the Tibetans, and assorted ethnic minorities in China yearning to break free of Chinese oppression.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

Good...Now answer the next question: What would be the appropriate response of justice against the country that created such a weapon and refused to surrender?

Executing the war criminals who were in charge of the Imperial Japanese Army, i.e. the people responsible for those atrocities.

Which already happened 70 years ago.

 

[gambit]

Bringing the specific people who created these weapons and refused to surrender to justice in a court of law. Oh wait the US doesn't believe in the rule of law. So yeah indiscriminately kill 300,000 civilians with nuclear weapons and force the rest of the world to defend itself by also getting nuclear weapons.

We cannot do that unless the country surrender. Is that too difficult to digest?

 

[gambit]

Executing the war criminals who were in charge of the Imperial Japanese Army, i.e. the people responsible for those atrocities.

Which already happened 70 years ago.

We cannot do that unless the country surrender and give up those people. The demand for unconditional surrender was offered to Imperial Japan and they refused.