Iran : No decision to close Hormuz Strait unless Iran threatened seriously’

[Al Bhatti]

The bubble (sorry, the muscle) got pricked by a needle.

 

[Raftar]

(Writing by Robin Pomeroy; Editing by Sophie Hares)

---------- Post added at 04:49 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:49 PM ----------

"I recommend and emphasize to the American carrier not to return to the Persian Gulf," Iran's army chief, Major General Ataollah Salehi, said at the time. "We are not in the habit of warning more than once."

 

[azbaroj]

threatening fail

Not fail , tension decreased by the letter of Obama , So Iran considering it as a routine visit .

 

[Kaniska]

Not fail , tension decreased by the letter of Obama , So Iran considering it as a routine visit .

Come on dude..u r just trying to put a facing saving exit...That is it...accept the fact...What is the big deal in the letter..Letter does not change the intention USA to dominate and control Iran nuclear power ambition.

 

[SinoChallenger]

threatening fail

Iran always said blocking Hormuz is in retaliation for sanctions. "You embargo me, I blockade you." The sanctions failed because China refused, and shortly afterwards Europe refused too.

 

[IranZamin]

First of all it is the Persian gulf you uneducated twat. Second, There are negotiations that is going to be held in Istanbul soon, It is not a right time for provocations by Irans side.
Third, Revolutionary Guards navy is going to hold naval excercises in the coming week

 

[azbaroj]

Come on dude..u r just trying to put a facing saving exit...That is it...accept the fact...What is the big deal in the letter..Letter does not change the intention USA to dominate and control Iran nuclear power ambition.

Please go through the chronology , US AC leave the PG , IRG commander warned not to comeback , that time US President lettered , some internal contact was going on & US declared to send the AC to PG . Iran also didn't declare to give up its Nuclar Intention & Iran will not .

 

[gambit]

So who says Iran is building nuclear weapons?bring a single proof for that.every year,about 1000 IAEA inspectors visit Iran's nuclear sites and they haven't seen even one single proof that Iran is going to build one.

What were they doing in Iran in the first place? Uranium shaping is one clue on how someone is going to use that chunk of uranium. Refinement level is another. There are literally hundreds of these clues.

Even Israeli officials and U.S's Panetta admitted that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon.

Show us the full context of their statements.

But maybe someday it builds one.So i can say maybe Germany and Japan build one too in future.can you deny that?

YOU can say so, but both countries are regularly inspected by NPT protocols and the inspections said otherwise.

Don't you think if Iran really wanted a nuclear weapon,it should have had it till now?Pakistan and India got the bomb years ago why can't Iran?it's not that hard.

Are you speaking from extensive experience at nuclear weapons design?

110 countries of Non Aligned Movement fully support Iran's nuclear program but the 'west' doesn't give a **** about it.Aren't they a larger part of international community?You are a hypocrite.

Support mean many things, least of all verbal support. Those countries can offer to materially support Iran in exchange for sharing of nuclear weapons. See it that happens...

About signing NPT,Iran has done nothing against it and has only seen sanctions and terrors instead.

Then why are the IAEA in Iran?

And you are saying countries who haven't signed NPT can have nuclear weapons?

The goal of the NPT is about the containment of nuclear weapons in exchange for nuclear technology. Those who are not signatories can develop nuclear weapons on their own but they will have to do so without the assistance of other nuclear powers. At least that is the intent. Try to read it when you have the time.

So i say Iran should resign from NPT now and go for bomb.After that what other excuse you will you have?

Why did Iran signed in the first place?

 

[nirreich]

Thanks to Israel,it's doing its job at terrorizing the middle east.Stay busy killing women,children and scientists.

killing innocent people is the what the Mullahs regime of Iran knows how to do best - in Israel, Lebanon, Yemen, Iraq, Argentina, Syria, and Bahrain. Do not throw stones when you are sitting in a house made of glass.

The US, the West and Israel will do what ever they can to prevent the terrorist regime of Iran to kill more women and children and will prevent this notorious regime from acquiring nuclear weapons.

 

[nirreich]

Aah and let me declare the winners after all our brothers arguing fighting and swearing the Zionists and people who wish to divide us. Whilst the fighters get banned.

Back on topic Iran has every right to respond in how it sees fit to any hostile action taken by any country against it

And the US and the West have every right to squash the Iranian navy if it tries to close an international route of trade.

 

[PERSIAN GOD KING]

And the US and the West have every right to squash the Iranian navy if it tries to close an international route of trade.

Squash? LOL okay we will see.
Iran navy canvetionaly is no match for usa in open warfare yes we know that, But unconventionally we can hurt them badly.

You're probably living in a fantasy like the BS in your avatar, so stay out of conversations that invlove reality since you clearly have no Idea about Iran military tactics.

 

[nirreich]

Squash? LOL okay we will see.
Iran navy canvetionaly is no match for usa in open warfare yes we know that, But unconventionally we can hurt them badly.

You're probably living in a fantasy like the BS in your avatar, so stay out of conversations that invlove reality since you clearly have no Idea about Iran military tactics.

Iranian military tactics might be good against defenceless people in the streets of Tehran or against oppressed minorities or to terrorise other countries, but as I said Iranian navy (which is a nice name for a few rubber boats and ancient ships) cannot close the Hormuz Straits and handle a naval attack of professional military like the US Navy.

Barking dogs do not bite - can be said about Iranian empty threats.

 

[Serpentine]

killing innocent people is the what the Mullahs regime of Iran knows how to do best - in Israel, Lebanon, Yemen, Iraq, Argentina, Syria, and Bahrain. Do not throw stones when you are sitting in a house made of glass.

The US, the West and Israel will do what ever they can to prevent the terrorist regime of Iran to kill more women and children and will prevent this notorious regime from acquiring nuclear weapons.

Don't put Israel among the big ones.You are NOTHING without your nuclear weapons and help from U.S.The only thing you are good at is killing women,children and murdering scientists.You can try and attack Iran on your own then you will feel by all your cells what being squashed means.

Iranian military tactics might be good against defenceless people in the streets of Tehran or against oppressed minorities or to terrorise other countries, but as I said Iranian navy (which is a nice name for a few rubber boats and ancient ships) cannot close the Hormuz Straits and handle a naval attack of professional military like the US Navy.

Barking dogs do not bite - can be said about Iranian empty threats.

Talking about barking dogs,who says everyday we are going to attack Iran's nuclear facilities and it doesn't have the balls?Yes that's Israel barking and not biting here.

The goal of the NPT is about the containment of nuclear weapons in exchange for nuclear technology. Those who are not signatories can develop nuclear weapons on their own but they will have to do so without the assistance of other nuclear powers. At least that is the intent. Try to read it when you have the time.

Why did Iran signed in the first place?

Iran signed NPT because it didn't think bunch of hypocrites own the IAEA and security council.
you are admitting that countries who haven't signed NPT can build nuclear weapons on their own without being punished.
I say it's better for Iran to resign from NPT then all sanctions become illegal.there is no need for building weapons.

Support mean many things, least of all verbal support. Those countries can offer to materially support Iran in exchange for sharing of nuclear weapons. See it that happens...

In their statement,they didn't support Iran just verbally,they demanded all sanctions to be lifted immediately.That doesn't mean verbal support.

What were they doing in Iran in the first place? Uranium shaping is one clue on how someone is going to use that chunk of uranium. Refinement level is another. There are literally hundreds of these clues.

They were in Iran for inspecting.Yes that's why they are called inspectors!and they didn't find even single proof that Iran is violating NPT.After that U.S called Al-Beradei (head of IAEA) pro-Iran.because he didn't say what U.S desired.It needs puppets like Amano to do their dirty job.

Show us the full context of their statements.

Panetta: Iran not building bombs yet
Israel says: Iran isn't building a nuclear weapon

YOU can say so, but both countries are regularly inspected by NPT protocols and the inspections said otherwise.

And Iran too is being inspected regularly and yet they couldn't provide proof.They just worry.that's all they can do.

 

[IranZamin]

Iranian military tactics might be good against defenceless people in the streets of Tehran or against oppressed minorities or to terrorise other countries, but as I said Iranian navy (which is a nice name for a few rubber boats and ancient ships) cannot close the Hormuz Straits and handle a naval attack of professional military like the US Navy.

Barking dogs do not bite - can be said about Iranian empty threats.

Yes. the mighty royal navy did well against Irans navy

2004 Iranian seizure of Royal Navy personnel - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

---------- Post added at 10:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:27 PM ----------

Iranian military tactics might be good against defenceless people in the streets of Tehran or against oppressed minorities or to terrorise other countries, but as I said Iranian navy (which is a nice name for a few rubber boats and ancient ships) cannot close the Hormuz Straits and handle a naval attack of professional military like the US Navy.

Barking dogs do not bite - can be said about Iranian empty threats.

Pathetic response from a pathetic zionist. Iran used the riot police to quell the riots in the capital aswel as the Basij militia civil order forces. The army never stepped in, maybe your zionist brain compares Iran to Bahrain ?

---------- Post added at 10:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:30 PM ----------

Iranian military tactics might be good against defenceless people in the streets of Tehran or against oppressed minorities or to terrorise other countries, but as I said Iranian navy (which is a nice name for a few rubber boats and ancient ships) cannot close the Hormuz Straits and handle a naval attack of professional military like the US Navy.

Barking dogs do not bite - can be said about Iranian empty threats.

Pathetic response from a pathetic zionist. Iran used the riot police to quell the riots in the capital aswel as the Basij militia civil order forces. The army never stepped in, maybe your zionist brain compares Iran to Bahrain ?

 

[PERSIAN GOD KING]

Iranian military tactics might be good against defenceless people in the streets of Tehran or against oppressed minorities or to terrorise other countries, but as I said Iranian navy (which is a nice name for a few rubber boats and ancient ships) cannot close the Hormuz Straits and handle a naval attack of professional military like the US Navy.

Barking dogs do not bite - can be said about Iranian empty threats.

Barking dogs will bite if you push them enough trust me, just give Iran a reason to bite.

Dont forget what an Iranian noor missiles did to your warship, so its not our ancient ships that will "bite".