Iran has rockets ‘to attack Saudi Arabia’

[The SC]

2 year old thread, and already the trolls are here.



But Iraq wasn't alone, was it? They had direct financial, material and in some cases military support by most of the Persian Gulf Arab countries, Europe, both superpowers... and we kicked them out defeating their main objective, which was to steal Iranian territory. That's how we "handled" Iraq.

Saudi, on the other hand, had to call in uncle sam...


To possess 1,000 MRBMs Saudi would have to drastically alter their military posture which I doubt they will do.

Didn't we discuss that sad war and saw that both parties were not alone..that they had support from outside.. the articles evidences and all that was already discussed.. do you have a short memory or you forget easily?
you are talking about Saudi Arabia 26 years ago..
And it did not cal in the US, it is the US who called on all its allies to join oust Iraqi troops from Kuwait and went further to take out Saddam himself.. these are the facts.. no one can twist them to suite his opinion ..

thats because you can't expect bravery and firmness from Saudis in case of any war, They knows that where they stand against Iran, those billion dollar weapons will eventually be either destroyed or fall into the hands of Iran and I expect more aggressive strikes from Iran against Saudis..


Arab world will stand united until they are getting something in return , otherwise you will see them begging from other countries to rescue them, Iran can endure such a damage and hit back harder but Saudis and their allies are hardly prepared to face such destructive scenario. each time iran will strikes them the moral of Arab soldiers will decreases then Russia and China will stand behind Iran while USA and west is as usual apologizing for not able to helping Arabs.
In the end all scenarios are in the favor of Iran.. They worked with certain militias and involved in various ground battles. They can fight for years but Gulf cannot.

Just Iraq with a population of 17 million could stand to Iran.. go revise your history books first and try to clean your brain from biased opinions.. you are just blabbering some uncomprehension through your opinion..

 

[AmirPatriot]

Didn't we discuss that sad war and saw that both parties were not alone

And Saddam had overwhelmingly more support than Iran.

you are talking about Saudi Arabia 26 years ago..

Even then they had F-15s...

And you were talking about Iran from nearly 40 years ago.

And it did not cal in the US

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_War#Operation_Desert_Shield

"Operation Desert Shield began on 7 August 1990 when US troops were sent to Saudi Arabia due also to the request of its monarch, King Fahd, who had earlier called for US military assistance"

 

[The SC]

2 year old thread, and already the trolls are here.



But Iraq wasn't alone, was it? They had direct financial, material and in some cases military support by most of the Persian Gulf Arab countries, Europe, both superpowers... and we kicked them out defeating their main objective, which was to steal Iranian territory. That's how we "handled" Iraq.

Saudi, on the other hand, had to call in uncle sam...


To possess 1,000 MRBMs Saudi would have to drastically alter their military posture which I doubt they will do.

Maybe they do have more than a thousand ballistic missiles, how do you know?
There were threads where you have participated with no less biased opinion than this one.. where it was explicitly through many articles said that KSA was making its own ballistic missiles in underground cities..

 

[AmirPatriot]

Maybe the do have more than a thousand ballistic missiles, how do you know?
There were threads where you have participated with no less biased opinion than this one.. where it was explicitly through many articles said that KSA was making its own ballistic missiles in underground cities..

Maybe I'm Batman, how do you know?

 

[The SC]

And Saddam had overwhelmingly more support than Iran.



Even then they had F-15s...

And you were talking about Iran from nearly 40 years ago.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_War#Operation_Desert_Shield

"Operation Desert Shield began on 7 August 1990 when US troops were sent to Saudi Arabia due also to the request of its monarch, King Fahd, who had earlier called for US military assistance"

Nope, it was proven that Iran got all the support it needed from China, North korea, Russia and many more ..even from the US; "Iran Gate"

As you should know Ksa 27 years ago had maybe 50 thousand soldiers and wasn't militarized that much apart from a few F-15s.. even the AWACs were still flown by Americans training the Saudi crue..so that is possible that The Saudi king called the US for assistance..but he as against the war..even attaching Iraq..

Maybe I'm Batman, how do you know?

We are not in Hollywood.. be real..

 

[AmirPatriot]

Nope, it was proven that Iran got all the support it needed

lolololol

You truly have NO CLUE what you are talking about. I've spoken to people who fought in that war, they are much better sources than your stupid articles that proved nothing but their own worthlessness.

We are not in Hollywood.. be real..

I was under the impression we were talking about fiction, you know, the whole "1000 ballistic missiles underground in Saudi"...

 

[drmeson]

This is a troll thread.

But still I want to see enemies getting hit by our Quasi warhead separating GRV's or LACMs with an unconventional warhead of Dichloroformaldioxime organometallic AChE Inhibitors fired from yemen rather than Iran.

Such molecules are fine tuned in terms of polarity (and resultant vapor pressure) by incorporating longer alkyl chains on alkoxy side of molecule (extra control over volatility). Even if these warheads get kinetic hit by a vehicle in depressed trajectory, the grains will still disperse based upon size/mass ratio of globule and ..... foams shall come out of the mouths of tens of thousands.

General Tommy Frank called Iranian CW warfare program as largest that he has seen .... and We have solid fueled Guided RV-MRBMs and LACM's to deliver them. This aint 80s, please pick a fight!

 

[The SC]

Actually we don't have uncle Sam to buy everything from them ... unlike you
moreover it's good to see how your military information are up to date:
1: the chopper is called "Zafar 300" which was an experimental project back in 1988 ...
2: on the tank .. you can tell your uncle Sam to equip its army better too : Ripsaw (vehicle)
3: The mini-submarine was shown in 2000 ... designed to plant mines and carry out reconnaissance missions in shallow water of Persian Gulf ....

And talking about real toys , as I said we don't have big uncle Sam ... therefore we make them on our own and if you produce anything such as submarines, drones, satellites, missile, AD systems, tanks , destroyer, choppers and fighter jet as we do please share them with PK members ....

Drones, satellites (sophisticated ones), missiles..this is done and still going..
Submarines, corvettes (you call them destroyers..no problem!), AD systems (being worked out with Ukraine as we speak), tanks, Abrams are assembled in KSA (next logical move is indigenous tanks..their electronics+ are 100% made in KSA), choppers (as you know the production line and ToT for the black hawk is coming very soon), fighter jets( wings and forward parts of the F-15s plus many electronic parts for the radars and avionics are Made in KSA.. and this is not any plane..).. a lot is still to be done .. so KSA is on its way with high quality systems..

 

[SALMAN F]

Not to mention the US who is just waiting for such an opportunity to destroy Iran..
Anyway..a childish article, far from professionalism in tone and content..


You couldn't handle Iraq alone.. show us when the Arabs left their tanks and run .. are you talking about Iranians?

It's the opposite it was iran vs the world
Iran already won the war in 1982 Iraq was or the offensive from for three years and the rest it was defensive

 

[The SC]

lolololol

You truly have NO CLUE what you are talking about. I've spoken to people who fought in that war, they are much better sources than your stupid articles that proved nothing but their own worthlessness.



I was under the impression we were talking about fiction, you know, the whole "1000 ballistic missiles underground in Saudi"...

Your word against the evidences that were provided with sources.. So you just think you have some clue.. it is all in you brain.. Iran fought with millions of solders , how do you want them to all have the best weapons..

Take it as fiction, others know better.. a lot of people around the world think that Iranian weapons are fiction I don't have the same believe.. but continue your haze..

It's the opposite it was iran vs the world
Iran already won the war in 1982 Iraq was or the offensive from for three years and the rest it was defensive

We have a thread about the whole war with dates.. it was a movement of offense and defence on both sides till the end..

This is a troll thread.

But still I want to see enemies getting hit by our Quasi warhead separating GRV's or LACMs with an unconventional warhead of Dichloroformaldioxime organometallic AChE Inhibitors fired from yemen rather than Iran.

Such molecules are fine tuned in terms of polarity (and resultant vapor pressure) by incorporating longer alkyl chains on alkoxy side of molecule (extra control over volatility). Even if these warheads get kinetic hit by a vehicle in depressed trajectory, the grains will still disperse based upon size/mass ratio of globule and ..... foams shall come out of the mouths of tens of thousands.

General Tommy Frank called Iranian CW warfare program as largest that he has seen .... and We have solid fueled Guided RV-MRBMs and LACM's to deliver them. This aint 80s, please pick a fight!

And you believe him..he has seen it!?
Not too long ago they were saying that Syria had the largest one and before that it was Iraq..don't wish for things that might happen to you..

This is a troll thread.

But still I want to see enemies getting hit by our Quasi warhead separating GRV's or LACMs with an unconventional warhead of Dichloroformaldioxime organometallic AChE Inhibitors fired from yemen rather than Iran.

Such molecules are fine tuned in terms of polarity (and resultant vapor pressure) by incorporating longer alkyl chains on alkoxy side of molecule (extra control over volatility). Even if these warheads get kinetic hit by a vehicle in depressed trajectory, the grains will still disperse based upon size/mass ratio of globule and ..... foams shall come out of the mouths of tens of thousands.

General Tommy Frank called Iranian CW warfare program as largest that he has seen .... and We have solid fueled Guided RV-MRBMs and LACM's to deliver them. This aint 80s, please pick a fight!

And you believe him..he has seen it!?
Not too long ago they were saying that Syria had the largest one and before that it was Iraq..don't wish for things that might happen to you..

 

[SALMAN F]

Your word against the evidences that were provided with sources.. So you just think you have some clue.. it is all in you brain.. Iran fought with millions of solders , how do you want them to all have the best weapons..

Take it as fiction, others know better.. a lot of people around the world think that Iranian weapons are fiction I don't have the same believe.. but continue your haze..


We have a thread about the whole war with dates.. it was a movement of offense and defence on both sides till the end..

Yea but everyone knows that Iraq had the allies and the upper hand in the end of the war not the begging
Iran had Breyer Air Force but no professional or experienced pilots and generals or spare parts Iraq was the opposite even though iran still have the better Air Force until 1984 I think after that Iraq had the better Air Force

 

[SALMAN F]

Your word against the evidences that were provided with sources.. So you just think you have some clue.. it is all in you brain.. Iran fought with millions of solders , how do you want them to all have the best weapons..

Take it as fiction, others know better.. a lot of people around the world think that Iranian weapons are fiction I don't have the same believe.. but continue your haze..


We have a thread about the whole war with dates.. it was a movement of offense and defence on both sides till the end..

Yea but everyone knows that Iraq had the allies and the upper hand in the end of the war not the begging
Iran had Breyer Air Force but no professional or experienced pilots and generals or spare parts Iraq was the opposite even though iran still have the better Air Force until 1984 I think after that Iraq had the better Air Force

 

[AmirPatriot]

Your word against the evidences that were provided with sources

No sunshine, not my word, the word of the people who actually fought in the war that you know nothing about.

For every "evidence" and "source" that you bring that suggests Iran had "enough" support in the face of the massive support Iraq got, I can bring up 100 sources which say the opposite. You are wrong SC, your bias won't make you any more right.

Iran fought with millions of solders , how do you want them to all have the best weapons..

Iran fought with millions because it didn't have access to weapons.

@SALMAN F no point in arguing with The SC anymore, I don't think. He is literally arguing with an Iranian and an Iraqi about the Iran-Iraq war.

 

[The SC]

No sunshine, not my word, the word of the people who actually fought in the war that you know nothing about.

For every "evidence" and "source" that you bring that suggests Iran had "enough" support in the face of the massive support Iraq got, I can bring up 100 sources which say the opposite. You are wrong SC, your bias won't make you any more right.



Iran fought with millions because it didn't have access to weapons.

Well, everyone knows who is biased in his opinions here.. go look at a mirror not at me.. you probably weren't even born when that war went on , I was here and watched its developments every day..

Bring on you evidence then..

You seem to be needing help from your yesterday enemy.. it is quite laughable..

 

[SALMAN F]

No sunshine, not my word, the word of the people who actually fought in the war that you know nothing about.

For every "evidence" and "source" that you bring that suggests Iran had "enough" support in the face of the massive support Iraq got, I can bring up 100 sources which say the opposite. You are wrong SC, your bias won't make you any more right.



Iran fought with millions because it didn't have access to weapons.

@SALMAN F no point in arguing with The SC anymore, I don't think. He is literally arguing with an Iranian and an Iraqi about the Iran-Iraq war.

Believe me you have to deal with his kind about this war specially the Saudis they keep saying population and country size they they forget that most of the countries were on Iraq side and iran was in turmoil because of the revolution even with the massive weapons that the shah left it's still useless in battle if you don't want professional military to use them

Take example at Nader jahanbani despise his execution the Air Force he build played important rule in the war

Well, everyone knows who is biased in his opinions here.. go look at a mirror not at me.. you probably weren't even born when that war went on , I was here and watched its developments every day..

Bring on you evidence then..

You seem to be needing help from your yesterday enemy.. it is quite laughable..

The evidence that iran was in state of revolution and crisis with both east and west while Iraq was the opposite isn't that enough evidence?!!

 

[drmeson]

And you believe him..he has seen it!?
Not too long ago they were saying that Syria had the largest one and before that it was Iraq..don't wish for things that might happen to you..

Well you people worship americans so I thought adding American general's qoute would help. Americans saved you from Baathists (who were requesting Iran of stopping the war after trying to invade it), Americans dance with you, give you toys against billions of dollars of oil money. American general's words should matter to you.

For me, I don't need anyone verification when as an academician I actually do know that Iran has people and resources who can synthesize such warheads in matter of days from humble most precursors. We rank 5th in world in STEM graduates and we produce 3rd highest engineering graduates in world. We are no expat run desert where 85 % engineers and 60 % doctors are foreigners. Don't wish for things that might happen to you ...