Iran envoy hopes Pakistan to address issue of Raheel Sharif’s appointment in IMA

[CHI RULES]

Pakistan has sent a former military general of theirs to head an OBVIOUS TO EVERYONE Saudi "alliance" that's aimed against iran.

Trump almost spelled it out for you with his " muslim/arab nato against iran" speech. Iran is well with in its right to see this as a hostile act by Pakistan. and diplomatically request that Pakistan reconsider its position (iran has not been threatning or giving ultimatums)

I don't see where this entire hostility towards iran comes from. especially in light of history.

lets not forget iran is the only neighbour that has no territorial claims/dispute with Pakistan. in spite of the fact that balochistan was Iranian not long ago, and was unjustly taken over by british imperialists.

let us not forget that iran was EASILY in a geopolitical position to cut a deal with india for decades and dismember Pakistan with iran taking balochistan/ india taking the rest (There have been rumours of such a deal floating around in 60s 70s)

let us not forget that despite the fact that iran has always been neutral/ slightly pro Pakistan in the Kashmir war. Pakistan outright took saddam husseins side when attacked iran and we were fighting for our existence.

iran was not only neutral towards Pakistan, but in 65 iran gave Pakistani planes free fuel to keep them in the fight. that completely broke irans neutrality. india had every right to see that as an act of war. (imagine someone giving saddams air force a safe haven/ fuel to fight the American air force with in 91. The US would have seen that as an act of war).

despite all this iran has no hostility towards Pakistan. or territorial claims. all we ask is keep your border secure so some Saudi paid terrorist cant pop out, murder some 18 year old Iranian conscripts, and run back into Pakistan. and if possible, don't join Saudi/Zionists/American alliances against us either. thank you.

Your false claims are pretty amusing as discussed point wise below.
1. Baluchistan was part of Iran wholly shit and a lie. Even if u go for a referendum in Sistan province I can bet majority shall vote against Iran. Every body including Iran confesses Sistan is the most underdeveloped area of Iran. Reasons include Sunni majority, oppression by Govt and no opportunities for youth to get livelihood legally.

2. The help which came from Iran to Pak was in Shah's era due to his good relations with Pak. The regime came after him is quite opposite. They do not consider Sunnis/especially Wahabis as Muslims. They call themselves Momin which I can't understand.

3. Pakistan never ever gave bases to USA to establish Mujahdeen Khalq camps in Pakistan. It is on record but many Irani's may not confess it due to their hostility towards Pakistan.

4. Iran has infect signed a number of economic/other agreements with India, directly impacting Pakistan. Kalbhoshan and other Indian spies getting entrance in Iran due to Iran's soft hand towards Indians.

5. A sectarian estate whether Iran or KSA cannot have normal ties with moderate Islamic estates as it is their mission to destroy Muslims having different sect than theirs. Iran has shown direct animosity towards Pakistan by recruiting Shia youth for Zainbya brigade and many terrorists have already been caught trained directly by Iran.

6. The Irani drone has been destroyed by PAF and in past few years many Pak civilians have lost lives due to hostile fire by Iran border guards.

My friend instead of accusing Pakistan you should have courage to ask your govt to stop hostilities through out Muslim world, start negotiations with KSA. Stop declaring different sects of Islam as non Muslims, abstain from declaring your self as Momin. Change Iran into a true Islamic estate instead of hostile Shia estate.

Adding to that it is big lie that Iran ever condemned India openly on Kashmir issue. Fact is neither Iran nor KSA are supporting Pakistan on Kashmir issue because of their economic interests with India.

 

[idune]

Iranian ambassador indirectly saying why Pakistani government issued "no objection" to Raheel Sharif? In this instance, Iranian ambassador stepping outside his place and questioning Pakistani independence of decision making. That opens the door for Pakistan to ask questions on whole host of Iranian decision concerning india.

This is bit strange because Iranian diplomacy is not typically like this. That begs the question if Iranian ambassador is getting influenced by indians or acting out of sync with Tehran?

Ignoring Iranian ambassador overreach, Tehran should reach out to Pakistan quietly and try to make sure Pakistani policy stays on course of balance and work together on terrorism and economic potentials. Expecting Pakistan to abandon Saudi relation and side with Iran is a foolish and impractical proposition. If Iran can not create that space for Pakistani "balancing act" within its relation with Pakistan then Iranians have not matured in their understanding of strategic and long term interest.