Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well, the Iranian part of IP pipeline was not just for exporting gas to Pakistan, rather it was for providing gas to Kerman, East Hormozhan, Sistan&balouchistan, and South Khurasan provinces as well. So, it's hard to tell if all that money is spent for pipeline to PakistanSomebody posted here Iran had already spent some money on her side(for IP), is it true?
Unlike the turbulent borders/relations with India and Afghanistan, the things between Iran and Pakistan were mostly calm, these things look a new development in the region.
Option 3 is not the main reason either, since they are already having enough headache regarding sunnis, and are not looking for more Sunni-Shia clash.
What rmi5 said above.self-delete : did not read above post
It may have many reasons. Maybe India has offered them a deal that they cannot refuse or maybe they are predicting the relation of Pakistan and US gets worse after US exists from Afghanistan, and want to get close to west with this strategy. Maybe they are afraid that Nawaz never trusts Iran and does not build pipelines. Many options can come into mind. We need to wait a couple of days to see the next move of Iran.Why would Iran like to open a new front against Pakistan when messed up with relations with Arabs and particularly the challenges coming from the rise of ISIS in Iraq.
Interesting development. Which of the following causes do you suspect are behind this?
1). Simply as stated, the project is not financially viable.
2). Iran's growing confidence due to anticipation of Western engagement in the event a nuclear deal is signed.
3). Sectarian friction.
4). The wrong bureaucrats and politicians were bribed.
On Pakistan's side, it's hard to see how a more advantageous agreement can be signed in the future, especially if sanctions on Iran are eased. On Iran's side, it's difficult to see why the insurance of closer relations and trade integration with Pakistan could be so easily dismissed. What are your thoughts, @rmi5 ?
One word: Price.
The negotiated price was unrealistic and the primary reason cited by India when it pulled out of this project. This is the real reason why Pakistan has been dragging its feet too. IIRC, the price was pegged at 70% of petroleum price.
Pakistan would be better off getting LNG supplied from Qatar. I know for a fact that in the '90s Qataris wanted to ink a deal with Pakistan, but it could not happen.
This project is not dead. It has gone into hibernation, as expected, and will be renegotiated after some years - hopefully at better rates. Iranians have shown a reaction because they knew that this project was not going anywhere and perhaps face-saving like this seemed better to them.
That sounds reasonable, but why would Pakistan have signed the agreement in the first place, if the price were so unfavorable?
It may have many reasons. Maybe India has offered them a deal that they cannot refuse or maybe they are predicting the relation of Pakistan and US gets worse after US exists from Afghanistan, and want to get close to west with this strategy. Maybe they are afraid that Nawaz never trusts Iran and does not build pipelines. Many options can come into mind. We need to wait a couple of days to see the next move of Iran.
Well, I do believe that everything in Iran is done by the direct order or consent of Khamenei, their leader. In Iran, such odds like having border clashes, then immediately the most important deal with a country, then sign a deal with the enemy of that country, does not happen accidentally
I am glad that you organized the discussion into this format.
Option 1 is not the case. Basically, Iran does not consider economic concerns as their main source for decision making. what matters are their strategic benefits. you can understand this by considering the huge direct and indirect costs(over 140 billion dollars) for so called Peaceful nuclear energy, or the money they pay to Hamas and hezbollah which puts them in isolation. As Khomeini said: "Economy belongs to donkeys!"
Option 3 is not the main reason either, since they are already having enough headache regarding sunnis, and are not looking for more Sunni-Shia clash.
option 4 is always present in every deal, but does not void them. No reason for bribery to cut such deal.
Option 2 is the answer or part of the correct answer. Iran is changing direction, since they no longer can afford their previous policy. It seems that getting close to India and getting far from Pakistan is part of their strategy.
Are you gonna do the same thing with china or you need there permission first.Just a suggestion to Iranian/Persian friends..........
Fence the wall or wire along the border with Pakistan....This will secure you against terrorists.....
India is doing along the border with Pakistan... Just serves you better ..........fire at sight of movement
Story of Pakistan's existence.Americans threatened to Sanction our Arse, so Pakistan backed out from the project