Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You cannot compare NK to Iran, NK lives in total poverty and isolation and only oil from China is keeping them alive. Iran is much more developed and thus inevitably linked with the world, it is not possible for Khamenei to decide we develop nukes at all costs because the people will not tolerate it if it sends us all to live like NK!If nukes can keep North Korea free from regime change, nukes are useful to any free country. But you need not 300 like China has, but 3000
The KSA can have thermonukes in four hours....
KSA never conquered Iran, KSA didn't exist until recently, a bunch of nomadic arab tribes and clans wondering the arabian peninsula waging war!KSA conquered Iran in the past. So what? They weren't able to make Iranians speak Arabic. And if KSA nukes Iran then Russia nukes KSA.
KSA conquered Iran in the past. So what? They weren't able to make Iranians speak Arabic. And if KSA nukes Iran then Russia nukes KSA.
You cannot compare NK to Iran, NK lives in total poverty and isolation and only oil from China is keeping them alive. Iran is much more developed and thus inevitably linked with the world, it is not possible for Khamenei to decide we develop nukes at all costs because the people will not tolerate it if it sends us all to live like NK!
US is very far from hypersonic cruise missiles, it only started the process last year, nothing until at least 2025 on that front.Being apart of the JCPOA will not keep Iran from sanctions and war. When Amerika has hypersonic missiles that can destroy all Iranian defenses, expect warmongering from Washington and expect NATO support like in Syria and Libya.
So either try to control the Europeans to continue to support the JCPOA, or before Iran is threatened by a 'president' pence, develop nukes.
A third path is to continue missile development and production. And get as many MANPADs as possible, well over 250.000, hide each one individually in the countryside, never stockpile them. And keep building up to ward off an attack.
Developing a remote controlled bore-ing, a sapper, a digging, 'explosive' to sneak up on tanks is another idea to prevent war.
Anything in a military depot is wasted money once hypersonic missiles come on board.
Even 90% uranium can't be used for the bomb .actually 20% enriched uranium is used specifically for medical purposes, Tehran Research Reactor (ironically built by the US in the 60s) uses 20% uranium to produce medical isotopes (for cancer treatment etc).
Also, 20% uranium cannot be used for nuclear weapons, that needs 90% enrichment (and then several more stages including miniaturisation of nuclear warhead to fit on a delivery vehicle (e.g. an ICBM)).
Well it failed to protect USSR from regime change.If nukes can keep North Korea free from regime change, nukes are useful to any free country. But you need not 300 like China has, but 3000
why not?Even 90% uranium can't be used for the bomb .
The chain reaction won't be fast enough for Da BOOMwhy not?
to be honest i don't understand, 90%+ is weapons-grade uranium so i don't know where you read that this cannot make a nuclear weapon...The chain reaction won't be fast enough for Da BOOM
actually 20% enriched uranium is used specifically for medical purposes, Tehran Research Reactor (ironically built by the US in the 60s) uses 20% uranium to produce medical isotopes (for cancer treatment etc).
Also, 20% uranium cannot be used for nuclear weapons, that needs 90% enrichment (and then several more stages including miniaturisation of nuclear warhead to fit on a delivery vehicle (e.g. an ICBM)).
If you think it is useless, U are grossly mistaken friend. US in its new doctrine -Rumsfeld after 2002- specifies that they are free to use nuke weapons against opponents. However what kind of opponnents these barbaric US leaders mean ? In fact against defenseless opponents, and especially those without nuke weapons. Remember during the Korea's war they did not hesitate to slaughter milllions of civilians, they were prompt to use nuke weapons against China. However when Stalin objected that he has nuke weapons too, US receded. During Vietnam's war they want to use nuclear weapons against North Vietnam, however Mao threatened to use it too. US moved back. In 1991 Bush Sr, and its team threatened Iraq to use against civilian Iraqis as solution regarding the poorly performances of US air coalition. Saddam's fear, he mistakenly ordered his army to retreat. During his retreat US profited to slaughter his army, one of the worst crime in human's history, made by the barbaric US leaders. This coward slaughter was turned by US media as 'great victory'.We could conduct a hot test for a nuke within a few months, but, it is not required. Iran knows that nukes nowadays are useless. .