You are just claiming things without any substantial evidence to back your claims. No one cares about your theory, you need to back your claims with evidence.
You seem to have problems with rational thinking. Russia refused to deliver the s-300 as far back as 2008, and Iran successfully tested the bavar-373 for the first time in 2014and it will not be ready till 2016. You must be quite bad at mathematics to confuse 2008 with 2016. Iran never claimed to have s-300 when Russians refused to deliver s-300, when did Iran claim to have s-300 in 2008?
Either do some basic research or don't comment at all. That way, you wont come across as a 10 year old troll.
and where are your proofs? all you have is "iran claims this, stated that" yet it has shown nothing, considering their claims with things like the f-313 and s-300 equivalents, i take any claims by the iranian media/govenment with a huge pile of salt.
in addition i never, at any point, said iran claimed to have the s-300, i said iran claimed to have an s-300 equivalent. which i already stated is possible if they are talking about an earlier s-300, not no way does iran have an equivalent system to the later s-300 models. i am not interested in rehashing the reasons why all over again.
and you claimed 2008 and 2016 dates makes no sense, yet you fail to see that while the deal was signed in 2007/2008, russia dragged its feet using various excuses until
2010 which it stated that because of the UNSC sanctions it cannot export to iran. and not even a year after the formal refusal to provide the s-300, iran in
2011 claims it would "soon" product the bavar 373 system. before stating im bad at math, go take a look in the mirror at yourself first
Furthermore, bavar-373 was stated to be more advance than s-300 by the air defence commander, whose words mean more in this matter than some wannabe expert living in the Us. Also, when pictures of bavar were leaked, one could see a poster comparing bavar-373 to s-300pmu2 which is the most advance of s-300 family. Now, one does not have to be genius to figure out it was pmu2 s-300 they were comparing bavar to all this time and not some older version. The poster was too blurry to make out the details, this was not an exhibition for the public, once bavar is officially unveiled then the full details will be released.
again with unnamed commanders, blurry posters and details "released soon", is there
photoshopped launched pictures too? maybe a
video of the super weapon said to be already working?. what were you expecting a iranian commander to say about an iranian system? that its terrible? that it doesnt actually exist? the russians claim they can detect the f-22 at long range with no problem and the su-35 can take down the f-35 without problems, does that make it true? Lockheed martin claims many things too, including that the f-35 will be as cheap as the f-16 to operates, we all know how true that is. fact is iran does not have the track record to show that they can match the s-300pmu2, if iran could match the s-300 pmu2 so easily in a mere handful of years then the s-300pmu2 wouldnt be such a formidable system(as its universally acclaimed to be), to this day, nations much richer and more industrialized than iran still has troubles or is just now matching the s-300pmu2 capabilities, nations like japan, china, india. in the case of india and china, they literally has the system to take apart as they please yet china is only now starting to match and exceed it and india still does not have anything to match it
unlike outrageous claims made by fanboys or unreliable media(which we can dismiss), those fake claims are routinely made supposed reliable news media in iran such as fars news. which means we simply cannot take those claims at face value.
In all honesty, you need to develop some more rational thinking capability and also attempt to alteast back your statements with some sort of facts. Your empty statements do nothing but waste thread space.
yea certainly some rational thinking could be used in this thread, ill just go ahead and dissagree with you about who needs it.
Not this baby:
Keyhan long range radar is a multi frequency 2d OTH. It is capable of detecting missiles and low RCS planes. It is also mobile.
very well.see something like this i would not dispute, unlike claims of matching or surpassing the s-300 pmu2 in a mere handful of years.
