masterchief_mirza
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2019
- Messages
- 9,706
- Reaction score
- 17
- Country
- Location
You're being overly dismissive of the facts and the context. Pakistan reengaged with Iranian leadership last year and both nations have brushed certain unsavoury incidents under the carpet in light of recent attempts at rapprochement. They know full well that there are anti-Pak assets harboured in SB province, as well as chabahar and its Indian contingent, used by Iran to pressure pk as and when they see fit. Iran plays this game and to suggest otherwise is being naive or in denial.I failed to see where the ministry accused Iran of being a perpetrator. I don't worship any country unlike you so spare me from your BUsh.
The reason iran's transgressions are overlooked by the establishment are not reasons of sectarianist blowback as much as a simple quantitative calculation that Pakistan cannot engage an aggressive stance against India, and Afghanistan and Iran. Pakistan has chosen to fight India in full public view and so will also discretely oppose Iran and afg on directly connected issues (eg espionage, RAW infiltration) but not otherwise. It is further true that apart from their support for Hindustan, Pakistan probably has no major unresolvable issues with either Iran or afg.
Sometimes Pakistan "parks" its arguments with Iran and afg while it focuses on India. That doesn't absolve either of our western neighbours of guilt in terms of meddling within our borders.
"Now we are not so naive that we will let India hijack the case by dragging Iran into it which would make the case longer and negative effect on Pak Iran relationship. "
Yes this is exactly right. Pakistan wishes to focus the scope of its efforts against jadhav as it may compromise its efforts against India by dragging Iran's state apparatus into the dock.