What's new

Iran: All Iran's restrictions in JCPoA are over

OLD NEWS BUT RELEVANT FOR IRAN

The CIA is worried about North Korea selling nuclear tech to the highest bidder

https://www.vox.com/world/2018/1/24/16927498/north-korea-cia-pompeo-nuclear-missile-aei

North Korea could potentially start a nuclear arms race by selling its technological know-how to other countries — and do so secretly.

That’s one of the main takeaways from CIA Director Mike Pompeo’s Tuesday remarks at a think tank event in Washington. Pompeo, a hawk with an extremely close relationship with President Donald Trump, argued that cash-strapped North Korea could decide to auction off its nuclear and missile technology to make desperately needed money, especially to Iran.

It would be a bold and risky move, but it has a macabre logic to it. North Korea likely would prefer to bring in hard cash by trading normally with other countries. The problem for Pyongyang is that it is heavily sanctioned by the US and other UN member nations because it refuses to abandon its nuclear and weapons programs. That stops it from sending some of its top potential exports like iron or seafood abroad.

That means North Korea is desperate for funds and could choose to sell what it knows about building weapons of mass destruction in order to make a buck. And it already has a list of willing customers: Experts told me that North Korea previously sold its nuclear technology to Pakistan, Iran, and Syria — and that there’s no reason to think it won’t do so again.

“Think of last year’s missile and nuclear tests as a giant arms brochure,” Harry Kazianis, a North Korea expert at the Center for the National Interest, told me. “There are billions and billions of dollars in missile sales alone that could be made.”

Zachary Keck, a nuclear expert at the Nonproliferation Policy Education Center, told me that Pyongyang’s new capabilities likely increased global demand for its weapons knowledge. Countries will mostly want to know how to make and reliably launch shorter-range missiles, he continued.

But it gets worse. Kazianis added that Pyongyang could smuggle weapons designs on a flash drive — yes, a flash drive — or simply break down missiles into small components and ship them through friendly countries. That would make it difficult for the US to detect if North Korea actually started selling blueprints or physical weapons.

“These are terribly difficult problems in incredibly tight spaces, and when you are moving information, it is sometimes difficult to detect that that information has moved,” Pompeo told the conservative American Enterprise Institute on Tuesday. “So if someone asks me as the senior intelligence leader of the CIA, can you guarantee this [would be uncovered], I would say absolutely not.

It’s a bleak picture: A world possibly full of more usable missiles and nuclear weapons, rather than fewer, thanks to North Korea — and the US may be somewhat powerless to stop it.

North Korea is creative in how it avoids sanctions
North Korea knows the world’s eyes are on it. That’s why it needs to find less-than-savory ways to bring in money to help funds its nuclear activities.

As Vox’s Zeeshan Aleem wrote last year, a December 2017 report from the Institute for Science and International Security, a Washington think tank focused on nuclear nonproliferation, found that a whopping 49 countries have violated UN Security Council sanctions imposed on North Korea between March 2014 and September 2017.

Here are some examples: Chinese ships secretly transfer oil to North Korean ships out at sea. US spy satellites spotted this illicit activity about 30 times since last October, though China has denied any wrongdoing.

Russian tankers have also transferred fuel to North Korean ships at sea at least three times in recent months in defiance of UN rules. Last September, Reuters reported that this year, at least eight North Korean ships carrying fuel sailed from Russia to North Korea despite officially declaring that they were headed to other destinations.

These moves show the lengths to which North Korea will go to make money, directly defying the international community in the process. Selling nukes could be its biggest money-maker of all.


 
We are now looking at the official beginning of the end of the jcpoa.
I`m actually quite surprised that the eurovassals had the balls to even do this as everything indicated that they would continue to do nothing either to support it or to tear it up in the hope that it could still be salvaged in the event of a one term chump regime.Then again this could be aimed at trying to halt the lifting of the arms embargo this year.Regardless with this act its official the jcpoa is dead....or soon will be once the paper work is signed[LOL!]
Hopefully iran can quickly accelerate its nuclear program and make up for the lost time AND rebuild its space program as these will be vital to any potential future nuclear deterrent.
 
Need to trigger mechanism to exit IAEA

well , I always said : "We should have nukes" because I study the westerns history through personal passions and I realized that the west won't sit on his place unless you have your sword ready to strike them or your gun to shoot them ....

The westerns are bunch of arrogant racist , they won't respect you unless they fear you ...
 
Heres the statement from the e3 eurovassals,but be warned its is a truly nauseating piece of utterly vile self justifying blood thirsty hypocrisy even by the standards of these people,and even as a westerner it makes me want to vomit......or punch someone.Probably the single most vile piece was:
"We do not accept the argument that Iran is entitled to reduce compliance with the JCPoA"
These people are truly SCUM!

Statement by the foreign ministers of France, Germany and the United Kingdom:

We, the Foreign Ministers of France, Germany and the United Kingdom, share fundamental common security interests, along with our European partners. One of them is upholding the nuclear non-proliferation regime, and ensuring that Iran never develops a nuclear weapon. The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPoA) plays a key role in this respect, as our Leaders have just unambiguously reaffirmed. The JCPoA is a key achievement of multilateral diplomacy and the global non-proliferation architecture. We negotiated the JCPoA with the conviction that it would decisively contribute to building confidence in the exclusively peaceful nature of Iran’s nuclear programme, as well as to international peace and security.

Together, we have stated unequivocally our regret and concern at the decision by the United States to withdraw from the JCPoA and to re-impose sanctions on Iran. Since May 2018, we have worked together to preserve the agreement. The E3 have fully upheld our JCPoA commitments, including sanctions-lifting as foreseen under the terms of the agreement. In addition to the lifting of all sanctions, required by our commitments under the agreement, we have worked tirelessly to support legitimate trade with Iran, including through the INSTEX special purpose vehicle.

Following Iran’s announcement in May 2019 that it would cease meeting some of its commitments under the JCPoA, we have sought to persuade Iran to change course. The E3 have worked hard to address Iran’s concerns and bring it back into compliance with its commitments under the nuclear agreement. We have also undertaken and supported diplomatic efforts, such as France’s initiative, to deescalate tensions and to bring Iran and the US to the negotiating table for a comprehensive negotiated solution. The E3 remain fully committed to this diplomatic effort and intend to resume it as soon as conditions allow.

However, in the meantime Iran has continued to break key restrictions set out in the JCPoA. Iran’s actions are inconsistent with the provisions of the nuclear agreement and have increasingly severe and non-reversible proliferation implications.

We do not accept the argument that Iran is entitled to reduce compliance with the JCPoA. Contrary to its statements, Iran has never triggered the JCPoA Dispute Resolution Mechanism and has no legal grounds to cease implementing the provisions of the agreement.

We publicly stated our concerns, along with the High Representative of the European Union, on 11 November. At the Joint Commission on 6 December, we made clear to Iran that unless it reversed course, we would have no choice but to take action within the framework of the JCPoA, including through the Dispute Resolution Mechanism.

Instead of reversing course, Iran has chosen to further reduce compliance with the JCPoA and announced on 5 January that “the Islamic Republic of Iran, in the fifth step in reducing its commitments, discards the last key component of its limitations in the JCPOA, which is the ‘limit on the number of centrifuges’”, and that “the Islamic Republic of Iran’s nuclear program no longer faces any operational restrictions”, including on enrichment and enrichment-related matters.

We have therefore been left with no choice, given Iran’s actions, but to register today our concerns that Iran is not meeting its commitments under the JCPoA and to refer this matter to the Joint Commission under the Dispute Resolution Mechanism, as set out in paragraph 36 of the JCPoA.

We do this in good faith with the overarching objective of preserving the JCPoA and in the sincere hope of finding a way forward to resolve the impasse through constructive diplomatic dialogue, while preserving the agreement and remaining within its framework. In doing so, our 3 countries are not joining a campaign to implement maximum pressure against Iran. Our hope is to bring Iran back into full compliance with its commitments under the JCPoA.

France, Germany and the United Kingdom once again express our commitment to the JCPoA and our determination to work with all participants to preserve it. We remain convinced that this landmark multilateral international agreement and its non-proliferation benefits enhance our shared security interests and strengthen the rules-based international order.

We are grateful to the Russian Federation and People’s Republic of China, with whom we remain in close consultation, for joining us in our common endeavor to preserve the JCPoA. We also thank the High Representative of the European Union for his ongoing good offices in this regard. Given recent events, it is all the more important that we do not add a nuclear proliferation crisis to the current escalation threatening the whole region.

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/e3-foreign-ministers-statement-on-the-jcpoa-14-january-2020
 
Heres the statement from the e3 eurovassals,but be warned its is a truly nauseating piece of utterly vile self justifying blood thirsty hypocrisy even by the standards of these people,and even as a westerner it makes me want to vomit......or punch someone.Probably the single most vile piece was:
"We do not accept the argument that Iran is entitled to reduce compliance with the JCPoA"
These people are truly SCUM!

Statement by the foreign ministers of France, Germany and the United Kingdom:

We, the Foreign Ministers of France, Germany and the United Kingdom, share fundamental common security interests, along with our European partners. One of them is upholding the nuclear non-proliferation regime, and ensuring that Iran never develops a nuclear weapon. The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPoA) plays a key role in this respect, as our Leaders have just unambiguously reaffirmed. The JCPoA is a key achievement of multilateral diplomacy and the global non-proliferation architecture. We negotiated the JCPoA with the conviction that it would decisively contribute to building confidence in the exclusively peaceful nature of Iran’s nuclear programme, as well as to international peace and security.

Together, we have stated unequivocally our regret and concern at the decision by the United States to withdraw from the JCPoA and to re-impose sanctions on Iran. Since May 2018, we have worked together to preserve the agreement. The E3 have fully upheld our JCPoA commitments, including sanctions-lifting as foreseen under the terms of the agreement. In addition to the lifting of all sanctions, required by our commitments under the agreement, we have worked tirelessly to support legitimate trade with Iran, including through the INSTEX special purpose vehicle.

Following Iran’s announcement in May 2019 that it would cease meeting some of its commitments under the JCPoA, we have sought to persuade Iran to change course. The E3 have worked hard to address Iran’s concerns and bring it back into compliance with its commitments under the nuclear agreement. We have also undertaken and supported diplomatic efforts, such as France’s initiative, to deescalate tensions and to bring Iran and the US to the negotiating table for a comprehensive negotiated solution. The E3 remain fully committed to this diplomatic effort and intend to resume it as soon as conditions allow.

However, in the meantime Iran has continued to break key restrictions set out in the JCPoA. Iran’s actions are inconsistent with the provisions of the nuclear agreement and have increasingly severe and non-reversible proliferation implications.

We do not accept the argument that Iran is entitled to reduce compliance with the JCPoA. Contrary to its statements, Iran has never triggered the JCPoA Dispute Resolution Mechanism and has no legal grounds to cease implementing the provisions of the agreement.

We publicly stated our concerns, along with the High Representative of the European Union, on 11 November. At the Joint Commission on 6 December, we made clear to Iran that unless it reversed course, we would have no choice but to take action within the framework of the JCPoA, including through the Dispute Resolution Mechanism.

Instead of reversing course, Iran has chosen to further reduce compliance with the JCPoA and announced on 5 January that “the Islamic Republic of Iran, in the fifth step in reducing its commitments, discards the last key component of its limitations in the JCPOA, which is the ‘limit on the number of centrifuges’”, and that “the Islamic Republic of Iran’s nuclear program no longer faces any operational restrictions”, including on enrichment and enrichment-related matters.

We have therefore been left with no choice, given Iran’s actions, but to register today our concerns that Iran is not meeting its commitments under the JCPoA and to refer this matter to the Joint Commission under the Dispute Resolution Mechanism, as set out in paragraph 36 of the JCPoA.

We do this in good faith with the overarching objective of preserving the JCPoA and in the sincere hope of finding a way forward to resolve the impasse through constructive diplomatic dialogue, while preserving the agreement and remaining within its framework. In doing so, our 3 countries are not joining a campaign to implement maximum pressure against Iran. Our hope is to bring Iran back into full compliance with its commitments under the JCPoA.

France, Germany and the United Kingdom once again express our commitment to the JCPoA and our determination to work with all participants to preserve it. We remain convinced that this landmark multilateral international agreement and its non-proliferation benefits enhance our shared security interests and strengthen the rules-based international order.

We are grateful to the Russian Federation and People’s Republic of China, with whom we remain in close consultation, for joining us in our common endeavor to preserve the JCPoA. We also thank the High Representative of the European Union for his ongoing good offices in this regard. Given recent events, it is all the more important that we do not add a nuclear proliferation crisis to the current escalation threatening the whole region.

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/e3-foreign-ministers-statement-on-the-jcpoa-14-january-2020


now you understand the real reason of so called protest and so called artist self retirement ( which is fake )
 
Heres the statement from the e3 eurovassals,but be warned its is a truly nauseating piece of utterly vile self justifying blood thirsty hypocrisy even by the standards of these people,and even as a westerner it makes me want to vomit......or punch someone.Probably the single most vile piece was:
"We do not accept the argument that Iran is entitled to reduce compliance with the JCPoA"
These people are truly SCUM!

Statement by the foreign ministers of France, Germany and the United Kingdom:

We, the Foreign Ministers of France, Germany and the United Kingdom, share fundamental common security interests, along with our European partners. One of them is upholding the nuclear non-proliferation regime, and ensuring that Iran never develops a nuclear weapon. The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPoA) plays a key role in this respect, as our Leaders have just unambiguously reaffirmed. The JCPoA is a key achievement of multilateral diplomacy and the global non-proliferation architecture. We negotiated the JCPoA with the conviction that it would decisively contribute to building confidence in the exclusively peaceful nature of Iran’s nuclear programme, as well as to international peace and security.

Together, we have stated unequivocally our regret and concern at the decision by the United States to withdraw from the JCPoA and to re-impose sanctions on Iran. Since May 2018, we have worked together to preserve the agreement. The E3 have fully upheld our JCPoA commitments, including sanctions-lifting as foreseen under the terms of the agreement. In addition to the lifting of all sanctions, required by our commitments under the agreement, we have worked tirelessly to support legitimate trade with Iran, including through the INSTEX special purpose vehicle.

Following Iran’s announcement in May 2019 that it would cease meeting some of its commitments under the JCPoA, we have sought to persuade Iran to change course. The E3 have worked hard to address Iran’s concerns and bring it back into compliance with its commitments under the nuclear agreement. We have also undertaken and supported diplomatic efforts, such as France’s initiative, to deescalate tensions and to bring Iran and the US to the negotiating table for a comprehensive negotiated solution. The E3 remain fully committed to this diplomatic effort and intend to resume it as soon as conditions allow.

However, in the meantime Iran has continued to break key restrictions set out in the JCPoA. Iran’s actions are inconsistent with the provisions of the nuclear agreement and have increasingly severe and non-reversible proliferation implications.

We do not accept the argument that Iran is entitled to reduce compliance with the JCPoA. Contrary to its statements, Iran has never triggered the JCPoA Dispute Resolution Mechanism and has no legal grounds to cease implementing the provisions of the agreement.

We publicly stated our concerns, along with the High Representative of the European Union, on 11 November. At the Joint Commission on 6 December, we made clear to Iran that unless it reversed course, we would have no choice but to take action within the framework of the JCPoA, including through the Dispute Resolution Mechanism.

Instead of reversing course, Iran has chosen to further reduce compliance with the JCPoA and announced on 5 January that “the Islamic Republic of Iran, in the fifth step in reducing its commitments, discards the last key component of its limitations in the JCPOA, which is the ‘limit on the number of centrifuges’”, and that “the Islamic Republic of Iran’s nuclear program no longer faces any operational restrictions”, including on enrichment and enrichment-related matters.

We have therefore been left with no choice, given Iran’s actions, but to register today our concerns that Iran is not meeting its commitments under the JCPoA and to refer this matter to the Joint Commission under the Dispute Resolution Mechanism, as set out in paragraph 36 of the JCPoA.

We do this in good faith with the overarching objective of preserving the JCPoA and in the sincere hope of finding a way forward to resolve the impasse through constructive diplomatic dialogue, while preserving the agreement and remaining within its framework. In doing so, our 3 countries are not joining a campaign to implement maximum pressure against Iran. Our hope is to bring Iran back into full compliance with its commitments under the JCPoA.

France, Germany and the United Kingdom once again express our commitment to the JCPoA and our determination to work with all participants to preserve it. We remain convinced that this landmark multilateral international agreement and its non-proliferation benefits enhance our shared security interests and strengthen the rules-based international order.

We are grateful to the Russian Federation and People’s Republic of China, with whom we remain in close consultation, for joining us in our common endeavor to preserve the JCPoA. We also thank the High Representative of the European Union for his ongoing good offices in this regard. Given recent events, it is all the more important that we do not add a nuclear proliferation crisis to the current escalation threatening the whole region.

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/e3-foreign-ministers-statement-on-the-jcpoa-14-january-2020
Heres Boris "wheres a hairbrush when you need one" Johnsons take on the jcpoas failure.

Johnson: New Trump Deal Can Replace the Iran Nuclear Pact
By Reuters

Jan. 14, 2020Updated 3:48 a.m. ET

LONDON — British Prime Minister Boris Johnson on Tuesday called on U.S. President Donald Trump to replace the Iranian nuclear deal with his own new agreement to ensure that the Islamic Republic did not get an atomic weapon.

"If we're going to get rid of it, let's replace it and let's replace it with the Trump deal," Johnson said of the 2015 nuclear arms control deal with Tehran. "That would be a great way forward."

"President Trump is a great deal maker, by his own account. Let's work together to replace the JCPOA and get the Trump deal instead," Johnson told the BBC.

Under the deal brokered in 2015, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), Iran agreed with China, France, Germany, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States, to restrict its nuclear program.

But in 2018, Trump pulled out of the deal. European powers have repeatedly said they still support the deal though Tehran announced earlier this month it would abandon limitations on enriching uranium, a further blow to the deal.

"If you get rid of this nuclear deal, the JCPOA, it's what Trump wants. My point to our American friends is, look, somehow or other you've got to stop the Iranians acquiring a nuclear weapon," Johnson said.

"From the American perspective, it's a flawed agreement, it expires, plus it was negotiated by President (Barack) Obama. From their point of view it has many, many faults."

Trump is confident he could still renegotiate a new nuclear deal with Tehran, White House adviser Kellyanne Conway said earlier this month after Iran announced it would retreat further from the 2015 nuclear pact.

"I don't want a military conflict between us, the United States and Iran, let's dial this thing down," Johnson said.
https://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2020/01/14/world/middleeast/14reuters-iran-crash-britain.html

What a literal piece of sh!t this guy is.:tsk:
 
A smart move by Iran will be this: if snap back sanctions are placed, not only will Iran leave the JCPOA but also the NPT. Iran must strengthens its hand as much as possible just in case it enters a new round of negotiation. However, I cannot see Iran negotiating with Trump, not after the Soleimani assassination.
 
A smart move by Iran will now be to say, if snap back sanctions are placed, not only will Iran leave the JCPOA and the NPT. Iran must strengthens its hand as much as possible just in case it enters a new round of negotiation. However, I cannot see Iran negotiating with Trump, not after the Soleimani assassination.

Yup‌, Iran needs to throw the ball further into their court and settle with more gains than JCPOA. The problem is the sanction prone economy, that needs to be fixed regardless of deal or no deal.
 
Yup‌, Iran needs to throw the ball further into their court and settle with more gains than JCPOA. The problem is the sanction prone economy, that needs to be fixed regardless of deal or no deal.

I don't know that much about the internal issues in Iran but a theme I see time and again is corruption and mismanagement. Until those two things are fixed, Iran will never truly thrive, with or without sanctions.
 
Last edited:
Iran will not leave NPT and will not INCREASE their nuclear program beyond minor levels!

They don’t have the balls to do it! Just watch, they will keep doing minor stuff and wait till election.

Anyone thinking that Iran will leave NPT, is forgetting how much of a cautious decision maker the IRI is! Look at the recent strike on Al-Assad. They rather stay in power and avert war than do what needs to be done.

Everyone here will be disappointed soon when they see the IRI just do nothing till the election. They want to see if Trump
Gets re elected (which he will) and if he does Iran HAS NO BACK UP PLAN.
 
Iran will not leave NPT and will not INCREASE their nuclear program beyond minor levels!

They don’t have the balls to do it! Just watch, they will keep doing minor stuff and wait till election.

Anyone thinking that Iran will leave NPT, is forgetting how much of a cautious decision maker the IRI is! Look at the recent strike on Al-Assad. They rather stay in power and avert war than do what needs to be done.

Everyone here will be disappointed soon when they see the IRI just do nothing till the election. They want to see if Trump
Gets re elected (which he will) and if he does Iran HAS NO BACK UP PLAN.

Iran had balls to respond to US occupation of Shia sites in Iraq.

Iran had the balls to help Syria when it was being torn apart by foreign psychopaths.

Iran had the balls to shoot down expensive US drones during periods of high tensions.

Iran had the balls to attack Abqaiq, likely even directly rather than through proxy.

Iran had the balls to pummel a US airbase after their terrorist assassination of Soleimani.

etc.


Iran is a reactionary nation, no action goes without consequences or answer.
 
Iran had balls to respond to US occupation of Shia sites in Iraq.

Iran had the balls to help Syria when it was being torn apart by foreign psychopaths.

Iran had the balls to shoot down expensive US drones during periods of high tensions.

Iran had the balls to attack Abqaiq, likely even directly rather than through proxy.

Iran had the balls to pummel a US airbase after their terrorist assassination of Soleimani.

etc.


Iran is a reactionary nation, no action goes without consequences or answer.

Just wait, when comes to self preservation or conflict, Republic picks self preservation everytime.

Nothing they have done has crossed any country’s major red line. Those thinking that Iran will leave NPT and race to a nuclear weapon are delusional.

Regardless of what Trump says, US was expecting a counter strike in accordance with international law and as long as it was minor US would let it slide.

Some material damage to an airbase in exchange for taking the most infamous commander of the Iranian legions off the board is an easy decision that any commander would make.
 
Back
Top Bottom