What's new

Invasion of India: Doc

Correction the Great Pakistani Punjabi King, his religion is irrelevant and not important, for all you know he could have been Buddhist or even an Atheist.

Lol...... u Pakistanis feeling ashamed in accepting Porus was a Hindu king.

And Pakistan was no where just 70 yrs back. It was only and only Bharat/ Hindustan.

Live in denial mode till even present starts denying u all.
 
.
As hindus!!
no muslim on the subcontinent who can claim being on the subcontinent for thousands of years as one...
So, yes there was a larger "Hindustan" from much before Islam was thought of.....

P.S. Islam is just one thousand year old, not thousands.....

I thought indians are so-called secularists - why does the religion matter so much to you, I say again religion of ancestors is irrelevant, a Greeks ancestors worshiped Zeus, today they worship Christ. But the Hellenic civilization belongs to them, likewise my ancestors history belongs to me and mine, not some Tamil.

Dude do you realize if religion is irrelevant, Pakistan itself which was formed in the name of religion, becomes irrelevant.

My ancestors religion is irrelevant, just as a modern Greek does not have to know Zeus to inherit his ancient heritage.

Indians trying to act like Porus was their father. lol

The truth is Porus was a Punjabi - he would think of these indians as foreigners in his Punjab, which became part of Pakistan.
 
.
I thought indians are so-called secularists - why does the religion matter so much to you, I say again religion of ancestors is irrelevant, a Greeks ancestors worshiped Zeus, today they worship Christ. But the Hellenic civilization belongs to them, likewise my ancestors history belongs to me and mine, not some Tamil.




My ancestors religion is irrelevant, just as a modern Greek does not have to know Zeus to inherit his ancient heritage.

Opportunistic believe.
 
.
Lol...... u Pakistanis feeling ashamed in accepting Porus was a Hindu king.

And Pakistan was no where just 70 yrs back. It was only and only Bharat/ Hindustan.

Live in denial mode till even present starts denying u all.

LoL but we Punjabi's Sindhi's, KPK, Baloch, Kashmiri etc have always been here, so therefore we are Pakistani, and our history is Pakistani also.

Opportunistic believe.

It is the bitter truth.
 
.
LoL but we Punjabi's Sindhi's, KPK, Baloch, Kashmiri etc have always been here, so therefore we are Pakistani, and our history is Pakistani also.



It is the bitter truth.

Lol again check ur facts...... 100, 200 or 500 yrs wont make you locals. You were Invaders and will remain that. nothing changes. By parting land you can not become Son of the soil. It is an arrangement made just 60yrs plus so that we live peacefully.

this partition was not based on History of Culture (sorry to bust ur bubble) but was purely based on religion. So you guys have no right to claim history and culture of past, Muhammad bin Qasim.
Past that period, everything belongs to us.

You like it or no, but it will remain forever.
 
.
indians never defeated Alexander, it was the ancestors of modern day Pakistanis.

Lol...... u Pakistanis feeling ashamed in accepting Porus was a Hindu king.

And Pakistan was no where just 70 yrs back. It was only and only Bharat/ Hindustan.

Live in denial mode till even present starts denying u all.

There was no indian until 1947. Before that it was british occupation, and most of what is india today was nothing more than scattered independent states.
 
.
indians never defeated Alexander, it was the ancestors of modern day Pakistanis.

100% correct brother, our ancestors and not indians - who can rightly claim the Ganges based civilization as their own.
 
.
indians never defeated Alexander, it was the ancestors of modern day Pakistanis.



There was no indian until 1947. Before that it was british occupation, and most of what is india today was nothing more than scattered independent states.

I fear, that may be what your history book teach, but world historians would differ with you
 
.
I fear, that may be what your history book teach, but world historians would differ with you

World historians will have to accept that Pakistanis own their history and not foreigners like indians.
 
.
.
lol, Pakistanis your ancestors were defeated/massacred by Sikander in middle east, Saudi region before he was defeated by Indians.. :D

Unfortunately, Indians didn't stay united in seventh century AD else Raja Dahir would have been your Hero today..
 
.
indians never defeated Alexander, it was the ancestors of modern day Pakistanis.



There was no indian until 1947. Before that it was british occupation, and most of what is india today was nothing more than scattered independent states.

Bharat has been in existence much before many religion came into existence and Hinduism has been practiced since then.

I know, this fact makes you guys very sad. But what to do, we have to live with this fact thru out the coming future, till the time human race exist.
 
.
Can a Tamil, Keralite, Maharashtrian, Malayalam, Gujrati, and Bengali claim the victories of Porus as his own? Porus was a Punjabi and Punjabis only make up 3% of indian population while Punjabis in Pakistan make up more than 40% of the population.

Therefore bharatis cannot claim Porus and others who defeated Alexander as their own. Porus is a Pakistani, NOT indian therefore we Pakistanis have the right to claim him.

:pakistan::pakistan::pakistan:
 
.
World historians will have to accept that Pakistanis own their history and not foreigners like indians.
Really, pray tell me where did Indians come from then?? Multiplied from a single guy like Amoeba???
It's your countrymen who are always claiming descent from foreign invaders, not not Indians.....we are proud to be who we are, wether hindu, muslim, sikh, parsi or anyone else........
 
. .

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom