What's new

Into the arms of the Rising Sun: Japan Set to Overtake China for Australia’s Biggest Trade Surplus

Aepsilons

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
May 29, 2014
Messages
24,960
Reaction score
118
Country
Japan
Location
United States
Japan Set to Overtake China for Australia’s Biggest Trade Surplus


BN-IX523_auseco_M_20150615024305.jpg



SYDNEY—When commodity prices were running hot three years ago, Australian companies raced to supply China with raw materials and forged trade links that eclipsed decades-old ties with Japan and South Korea.

Now, plunging commodity prices have changed all that.

Since 2012, Australia’s trade surplus with China has dwarfed its other trading partners. This year, Japan is set to reclaim that title. Extrapolating from trends in the first four months, the government estimates that Australia’s surplus with Japan this year will reach 24.5 billion Australian dollars (US$18.6 billion), compared with a A$19.4 billion surplus with China.

Scroll back only two years, and the China figure was close to A$50 billion—double the number for Japan.

“It’s not that Japan is suddenly important,” said Annette Beacher, head of Asia-Pacific economic research at TD Securities, based in Singapore. “It is just that the supernova of China has been and gone. The recent emphasis on China is clearly warranted, but it’s been at the expense of ever-reliable Japan.”

The improving trade balance with Japan is partly due to dwindling Australian imports of car parts, as the domestic auto industry shuts down. At the same time, the intake of Chinese goods such as electronics, clothes and household goods has been increasing.

However, the main factor influencing the shifting trade balances is iron ore, Australia’s biggest export in dollar terms.

Most of Australia’s exports of the steelmaking ingredient are currently shipped to China, whose economy has been slowing now for some time. A 50% collapse in iron-ore prices over the past year has savaged Australian export earnings, while coal has also experienced massive price falls. China imported 94.4 million tons of coal in 2014, up 7.1% from a year earlier, according to China’s General Administration of Customs.

AI-CQ331A_AUSTR_16U_20150615042706.jpg




The decline in commodity prices has reinforced the importance of Australia’s trade ties with Japan, its pre-eminent trading partner for decades before China’s rapid expansion, and raised questions over whether the relationship’s significance is being underestimated.

To be sure, Japan is also a big buyer of Australian commodities, with coal, iron ore and beef currently topping the list. However, Japan imports a broader range of Australian goods than China does. Since the 1980s, Japan has also been a key importer of Australian liquefied natural gas, or LNG—exports of which are expected to increase rapidly as new producers here ramp up output.

Still, it isn’t yet clear whether Japan’s return to the top of the trade-balance charts is a blip or a trend. While the nation’s demand for Australian LNG is expected to rise to 40% of its total intake over the next five years from about a fifth currently, exports to China are also expected to grow substantially—to around 18 billion tons a year by 2020 from 5 billion tons currently.

There is also the chance of iron ore staging a recovery, which could quickly improve the trade balance with China. Many industry analysts, however, believe a prolonged supply glut makes a strong rebound in the price unlikely, just as some expect LNG prices to drop sharply this year and next, in line with the lag effect of a lower oil price.

Any such drop would drive down the value of sales of LNG primarily to Japan, according to Rob Rennie, global head of currency strategy at Westpac Banking Corp. He forecasts that by around the middle of the year, the price of LNG sold to Japan will be half of what it was in mid-2012.

The trade balance isn’t the only measure of the relative importance of Australia’s trade relationships. For instance, China will likely remain Australia’s biggest trading partner this year according to the value of goods exported, which is expected to continue running close to A$80 billion in 2015—twice the value of Australian goods destined for Japan.

How things play out also may be influenced by how quickly recent free-trade deals with both Asian countries are implemented. Australia reached pacts with Japan, China and South Korea, its third-biggest trading partner, in 2014.

Encouraged by the free-trade deal with Tokyo, Marcello Colosimo, chief executive of microbrewer the Australian Brewery, acted late last year to build a beachhead in Japan, linking up with supermarkets there to sell Pilsner and Pale Ale beers.

“Our consumption figures are growing steadily, which is always a good indication,” Mr. Colosimo said. “The FTA is a great win for businesses who wanted to, but weren’t sure how to expand their trade offshore.”




@jhungary @LeveragedBuyout




Japan Set to Overtake China for Australia’s Biggest Trade Surplus - WSJ
 
.
Unimportant statistic. Total trade is more important. There, China is the undisputed number 1 and will keep growint it's lead. But of course it's good to diversify, and trade with as many countries as possible. I love to see the day when Australia becomes an actual Asian country. As in, sure they're white Europeans, but their bonds with their Asian neighbours will be stronger than with the 'past'. All because of trade. Let's see it happening with the Asia pivot first.
 
.
China and Australia have just signed free trade agreement and will come into reality soon
More made in China product selling to Australia and more beef, milk products selling to China..

Unimportant statistic. Total trade is more important. There, China is the undisputed number 1 and will keep growint it's lead. But of course it's good to diversify, and trade with as many countries as possible. I love to see the day when Australia becomes an actual Asian country. As in, sure they're white Europeans, but their bonds with their Asian neighbours will be stronger than with the 'past'. All because of trade. Let's see it happening with the Asia pivot first.
 
. . .
Japan Set to Overtake China for Australia’s Biggest Trade Surplus


BN-IX523_auseco_M_20150615024305.jpg



SYDNEY—When commodity prices were running hot three years ago, Australian companies raced to supply China with raw materials and forged trade links that eclipsed decades-old ties with Japan and South Korea.

Now, plunging commodity prices have changed all that.

Since 2012, Australia’s trade surplus with China has dwarfed its other trading partners. This year, Japan is set to reclaim that title. Extrapolating from trends in the first four months, the government estimates that Australia’s surplus with Japan this year will reach 24.5 billion Australian dollars (US$18.6 billion), compared with a A$19.4 billion surplus with China.

Scroll back only two years, and the China figure was close to A$50 billion—double the number for Japan.

“It’s not that Japan is suddenly important,” said Annette Beacher, head of Asia-Pacific economic research at TD Securities, based in Singapore. “It is just that the supernova of China has been and gone. The recent emphasis on China is clearly warranted, but it’s been at the expense of ever-reliable Japan.”

The improving trade balance with Japan is partly due to dwindling Australian imports of car parts, as the domestic auto industry shuts down. At the same time, the intake of Chinese goods such as electronics, clothes and household goods has been increasing.

However, the main factor influencing the shifting trade balances is iron ore, Australia’s biggest export in dollar terms.

Most of Australia’s exports of the steelmaking ingredient are currently shipped to China, whose economy has been slowing now for some time. A 50% collapse in iron-ore prices over the past year has savaged Australian export earnings, while coal has also experienced massive price falls. China imported 94.4 million tons of coal in 2014, up 7.1% from a year earlier, according to China’s General Administration of Customs.

AI-CQ331A_AUSTR_16U_20150615042706.jpg




The decline in commodity prices has reinforced the importance of Australia’s trade ties with Japan, its pre-eminent trading partner for decades before China’s rapid expansion, and raised questions over whether the relationship’s significance is being underestimated.

To be sure, Japan is also a big buyer of Australian commodities, with coal, iron ore and beef currently topping the list. However, Japan imports a broader range of Australian goods than China does. Since the 1980s, Japan has also been a key importer of Australian liquefied natural gas, or LNG—exports of which are expected to increase rapidly as new producers here ramp up output.

Still, it isn’t yet clear whether Japan’s return to the top of the trade-balance charts is a blip or a trend. While the nation’s demand for Australian LNG is expected to rise to 40% of its total intake over the next five years from about a fifth currently, exports to China are also expected to grow substantially—to around 18 billion tons a year by 2020 from 5 billion tons currently.

There is also the chance of iron ore staging a recovery, which could quickly improve the trade balance with China. Many industry analysts, however, believe a prolonged supply glut makes a strong rebound in the price unlikely, just as some expect LNG prices to drop sharply this year and next, in line with the lag effect of a lower oil price.

Any such drop would drive down the value of sales of LNG primarily to Japan, according to Rob Rennie, global head of currency strategy at Westpac Banking Corp. He forecasts that by around the middle of the year, the price of LNG sold to Japan will be half of what it was in mid-2012.

The trade balance isn’t the only measure of the relative importance of Australia’s trade relationships. For instance, China will likely remain Australia’s biggest trading partner this year according to the value of goods exported, which is expected to continue running close to A$80 billion in 2015—twice the value of Australian goods destined for Japan.

How things play out also may be influenced by how quickly recent free-trade deals with both Asian countries are implemented. Australia reached pacts with Japan, China and South Korea, its third-biggest trading partner, in 2014.

Encouraged by the free-trade deal with Tokyo, Marcello Colosimo, chief executive of microbrewer the Australian Brewery, acted late last year to build a beachhead in Japan, linking up with supermarkets there to sell Pilsner and Pale Ale beers.

“Our consumption figures are growing steadily, which is always a good indication,” Mr. Colosimo said. “The FTA is a great win for businesses who wanted to, but weren’t sure how to expand their trade offshore.”




@jhungary @LeveragedBuyout




Japan Set to Overtake China for Australia’s Biggest Trade Surplus - WSJ

Before I comment on your question, let me show you something first

Buy CHANGHONG 50" (127cm) Full HD LED TV LED50C5000 | Read Reviews | Dick Smith Online Shopping

Buy JVC 50" (127cm) Full HD LED TV LT-50N550A | Read Reviews | Dick Smith Online Shopping

Those are two TV with the same spec, one made by Changhong in China, while the other is JVC from Japan.

Notice that the Changhong TV set, while it is 30 dollar cheaper in price, it was on special.

Now, go back to your question.

The market with China and Japan is different, while most of Chinese market digest primary resource(Such as Iron Ore or Coal) The market in Japan is a bit more diverse than the one in China, problem is, we Aussie have experience a period of negative balance during the last 5 years, thus we are whole selling our resource to China to make up the balance, so in that 5 years, the majority of our trade balance is from selling ore and Coal and Steel to China.

On the other hand, selling to Japan and the high cost of import from Japan prohibit the trade balance toward Japan, as we cannot simply dump all our resource and expect Japan to digest them all, and therefore the market of Japan and Korea were actually ignored to satisfy the Chinese market, cause there where the money goes.

but this couple of years, we have a better surplus than before and the resource price slum as basically we pump too much too quick, couple with the manufacture index in China started to die down, we simply cannot dump our resource to China anymore, and right about this time, the cost of crude oil and labour issue as well as free trade agreement couple with cheaper dollars (1 AUD : 70 US Cents now compare to 1 AUD to 1.1 USD 4, 5 years ago) the price to import from Japan have gone less and meanwhile we have a direct exchange rate to RMB and the price remain unchanged to China.

That's combine with the fact that Australian manufacturer have going back to the normal demand, we simply don't need to and can't export resource anymore and China won't take our secondary and tertiary product, hence it's only nature to see the balance tilt back to Japan favour. I mean, 5 years ago, I can get a cheap Chinese TV set for 500 AUD while a Japanese TV set for 700-800, now the price is more or less the same.
Not just Japan, trade with US is also heating up too.
 
.
Before I comment on your question, let me show you something first

Buy CHANGHONG 50" (127cm) Full HD LED TV LED50C5000 | Read Reviews | Dick Smith Online Shopping

Buy JVC 50" (127cm) Full HD LED TV LT-50N550A | Read Reviews | Dick Smith Online Shopping

Those are two TV with the same spec, one made by Changhong in China, while the other is JVC from Japan.

Notice that the Changhong TV set, while it is 30 dollar cheaper in price, it was on special.

Now, go back to your question.

The market with China and Japan is different, while most of Chinese market digest primary resource(Such as Iron Ore or Coal) The market in Japan is a bit more diverse than the one in China, problem is, we Aussie have experience a period of negative balance during the last 5 years, thus we are whole selling our resource to China to make up the balance, so in that 5 years, the majority of our trade balance is from selling ore and Coal and Steel to China.

On the other hand, selling to Japan and the high cost of import from Japan prohibit the trade balance toward Japan, as we cannot simply dump all our resource and expect Japan to digest them all, and therefore the market of Japan and Korea were actually ignored to satisfy the Chinese market, cause there where the money goes.

but this couple of years, we have a better surplus than before and the resource price slum as basically we pump too much too quick, couple with the manufacture index in China started to die down, we simply cannot dump our resource to China anymore, and right about this time, the cost of crude oil and labour issue as well as free trade agreement couple with cheaper dollars (1 AUD : 70 US Cents now compare to 1 AUD to 1.1 USD 4, 5 years ago) the price to import from Japan have gone less and meanwhile we have a direct exchange rate to RMB and the price remain unchanged to China.

That's combine with the fact that Australian manufacturer have going back to the normal demand, we simply don't need to and can't export resource anymore and China won't take our secondary and tertiary product, hence it's only nature to see the balance tilt back to Japan favour. I mean, 5 years ago, I can get a cheap Chinese TV set for 500 AUD while a Japanese TV set for 700-800, now the price is more or less the same.
Not just Japan, trade with US is also heating up too.


Thank You for that thorough answer, Sir!

China and Australia have just signed free trade agreement and will come into reality soon
More made in China product selling to Australia and more beef, milk products selling to China..


So has Japan. We signed an FTA EPA with the Australians. Kangaroo and Crane can Play ;)
 
.
Wow, I did not know about Changhong. Seems like already a major player.

Samsung stays dominant in UHD TV market

Published : 2015-05-20 10:05
Updated : 2015-05-20 10:05

South Korea's top tech giant Samsung Electronics Co. maintained its lead in the global Ultra HD TV market for the fourth consecutive quarter in the January-March period, but its presence weakened in the face of rising Chinese rivals, data showed Wednesday.

Samsung Electronics took up 24.3 percent of the UHD TV market in the first quarter by shipment, down 2.6 percentage points from a quarter earlier, according to the data compiled by industry tracker DisplaySearch.

Its local rival LG Electronics Inc. ranked second with a share of 14.8 percent in the first quarter, down 0.4 percentage point over the cited period.

Chinese players, including HiSense Electric Co. and Skyworth Group Co., expanded their ground in the UHD TV segment. HiSense and SKyworth took up 10.9 percent and 8.2 percent, up 3.2 percentage points and 0.8 percentage points, respectively, from a quarter earlier.

Other brands, including TCL Corp., Konka Electric Co. and Changhong Electric Co., also posted improved market shares of 8.7 percent, 6.6 percent and 5.5 percent, respectively, in the first quarter, according to the data.


Japan-based Sony Corp. saw its share fall 2.5 percentage points on-quarter to reach 3.9 percent, although Sharp Corp. managed to expand its presence by 0.3 percentage point to 3.2 percent.

Global shipments of UHD TVs reached 4.66 million units in the first quarter, soaring from 941,000 units posted last year. This compares to the entire shipments of TVs, which fell 1.06 million units to 49.9 million units. (Yonhap)


***

Changhong annuncia gli Smart TV curvi Ultra HD Q2C con un 65" a 2.000€
12 Giugno 2015

id401175_1.jpg


id401173.jpg
 
Last edited:
.
Yes. Yet China has a bigger population and higher demands for beef and milk products.
So in trading volume, I think China will surpass Japan.


Thank You for that thorough answer, Sir!
So has Japan. We signed an FTA EPA with the Australians. Kangaroo and Crane can Play ;)
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom