Internationally renowned legal experts on conflict, back Israel over Gaza war

[p4kistan]

I think I'm safe to assume he won't reach the heights of these eminent people.

I find it funny that people with the qualifications, experience, and respect of everyone in their field - are accused of lying by a little Pakistani boy on the internet.

In case you're unaware, conflict experts and legal authorities such as these two men, adhere to international laws and their verdicts are in accordance with international law. They will not stake their reputations by "lying" about the law.

Now if you can show where they have gone wrong in their legal ruling, I'll be very impressed.

Until then, keep supporting 'palestinians' who don't give a rats behind about you

Assumptions are the mother of all F ups. You may think they have reached a "height" and may be "eminent" but only their circles & idiots like you hold these opinions. Yours is also an OPINION which means jack all.

Can you please tell me anywhere i have stated they are "LYING"? Nada, Zilch. Again you're assuming sh1t. Clearly shows i may be a BOY conversing with an OAP idiot.

International law etc suits zionist when it is in support of them but is not credit worthy when it goes against them.

AGAIN WESTERN NARRATIVE IS NOT THE ONLY ONE. FOR EVERY ARGUMENT FOR THE ISRAELIS THERE IS AN ARGUMENT AGAINST AND VICE VERSA

F THE LEGAL RULING, IT DOESN'T MEAN JACK SH1T. THE FIGHT AGAINST OCCUPATION WILL CONTINUE UNTIL FREEDOM IS ESTABLISHED WHETHER PALESTINIANS GIVE A RATS ABOUT ME OR NOT.

 

[Hasbara Buster]

Those "experts" are Westerners. Who in his right mind (and heart) would give a **** about what a bunch of crazed Western imperialist "experts" say? They say a lot of things, look at the things they've said in the past 20 years alone; all have already been proven to be lies. From Saddam's WMD to Al Qaeda to ISIS to Libya, Syria, Ukraine, Iran and on and on.. everything they say is a lie, everything they do is criminal and illegal.

 

[Vassnti]

The social media changed all this. Take a look at twitter, facebook and youtube. Whenever there's a conflict raging, supporters take to the social media voicing their opinion. Always the hashtags on twitter pro-Israel are badly outnumbered by the hashtags pro-Palestine. Despite the fact that a huge number Israeli, pro-Israeli groups, try their best to co-ordinate such efforts.

Whatever, the state of corporate media was in the past. Social media is slowly destroying Israel's credibility, the US' credibility on Israel, and that too, these changes are happening in the US, in Western Europe and even within their respective Jewish communities. That latter point is a very big deal!

I would contend that Bibi and the policies of Likud are destroying Israels credibility and the media social or corporate is just the messenger.

On the number of hashtags, does it matter? If you think who is tweeting bloging and facebooking their opinions, the young the "left wing" the poor Uni student that belives in a world that is esentially fair and thier voice matters. The other side is quieter because they are counting the billions from thier latest arms sale, safe in the knowledge that anything they seriously dont like is getting vetoed in the security council.

 

[Jungibaaz]

I would contend that Bibi and the policies of Likud are destroying Israels credibility and the media social or corporate is just the messenger.

On the number of hashtags, does it matter? If you think who is tweeting bloging and facebooking their opinions, the young the "left wing" the poor Uni student that belives in a world that is esentially fair and thier voice matters. The other side is quieter because they are counting the billions from thier latest arms sale, safe in the knowledge that anything they seriously dont like is getting vetoed in the security council.

This is true. The Israeli left I was hoping they'd return, but Likud certainly does a bad job of maintaining whatever image Israel has left in some parts of the world.

And trust me, social media matters, this is an entirely different form of media. Dominated by the demographic group you identified, and used by many more. Naturally, the social media is further left and not representative. But it is an alternate form of media, and represents a huge chunk of future generations. It will go some way in changing attitudes and has done already. And this is evident...

The Israeli crowd are busying themselves trying to tackle criticism on social media. With a lot of resources and rather weird amounts of effort.

 

[Archdemon]

Assumptions are the mother of all F ups. You may think they have reached a "height" and may be "eminent" but only their circles & idiots like you hold these opinions. Yours is also an OPINION which means jack all.

Can you please tell me anywhere i have stated they are "LYING"? Nada, Zilch. Again you're assuming sh1t. Clearly shows i may be a BOY conversing with an OAP idiot.

International law etc suits zionist when it is in support of them but is not credit worthy when it goes against them.

AGAIN WESTERN NARRATIVE IS NOT THE ONLY ONE. FOR EVERY ARGUMENT FOR THE ISRAELIS THERE IS AN ARGUMENT AGAINST AND VICE VERSA

F THE LEGAL RULING, IT DOESN'T MEAN JACK SH1T. THE FIGHT AGAINST OCCUPATION WILL CONTINUE UNTIL FREEDOM IS ESTABLISHED WHETHER PALESTINIANS GIVE A RATS ABOUT ME OR NOT.

LOL, dont you mean Arabs?

 

[p4kistan]

LOL, dont you mean Arabs?

Hence " FOR EVERY ARGUMENT FOR THE ISRAELIS THERE IS AN ARGUMENT AGAINST AND VICE VERSA"

Do you want me to explain vice versa?

 

[Indus Falcon]

Hence " FOR EVERY ARGUMENT FOR THE ISRAELIS THERE IS AN ARGUMENT AGAINST AND VICE VERSA"

Do you want me to explain vice versa?

Subha hoejaiegee jahil koe samjhatay samjhatay

 

[The SC]

You're making a lot of assumptions there and trying to somehow connect these two lawyers to Judaism.

Even if they were Jewish, would that negate their findings? I mean people like you will use data from Israeli human rights groups and NGO's when it suits your agenda, but when it doesn't, it's Jewish propaganda?

Again, if you can find fault with their legal reasoning, perhaps you could share it with us.

Actually you are just trying to switch facts to your thought process's favor, it won't work for you as the rules of engagement you are talking about, concern armed forces engaging in battle, not one sided full fledged army, Navy and airforce against occupied civilians who have no other choice but to fire back with whatever rudimentary means of defense they have, even stones!!!
The fault, you intellectual wannabe is in the contested occupation inherently, add to it armed aggression and genocide.