What's new

Interceptor missile mission a ‘failure’

well this is exactly what i have been saying,
these are just news articles publishing stories. A story about a failure can be as real as the story about success or vice versa so the problem is what one should believe in.Keep that in mind i decide to wait for now.
But what kind of source you want to believe is something has to do with common sense . The Hindu and other prominent news media reports who confirmed with DRDO or some moron write some crap in his own blog ????

our political leaders and military establishments will be laughing at this article
 
.
What is this, 'informed source', DRDO have several times told us openly about if parameters werent met. They've been very consistent on this.
 
.
failures of success now the truth is its not 90s era india reached light years ahead of pakistan while our missile space and weapons programs is stuck in 90 era missiles and few toys .
 
. .
The interceptor never took off to intercept incoming “enemy” missile, say sources
The interceptor missile mission, which took place on May 15, was a failure despite claims of the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) to the contrary. The interceptor never took off to intercept the incoming “enemy” missile which merely fell into the Bay of Bengal, informed sources said.

An agency report on May 16 said a modified Prithvi missile was launched on May 15 from a naval ship in the Bay of Bengal and it mimicked the trajectory of a missile coming from an enemy country.

‘Never took off’
Informed sources, however, said the interceptor missile never took off from the island; so no interception took place at all. “Post-flight analysis is going on. We do not know whether there was problem in detecting the missile, whether radars tracked it and communicated it to the interceptor,” said the sources.


The DRDO developed both the Prithvi missile and the interceptor.

2015 mission failed too

In April 2015, a similar mission failed after the interceptor dived into the Bay of Bengal a few seconds after lift off. In that mission, the DRDO planned to conduct the test against an electronic target missile. In April 2014, the warhead in the interceptor failed to explode, although the interception of the incoming “enemy” missile took place at an altitude of 120 km.

http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/interceptor-missile-mission-a-failure/article8634085.ece
[/QUOTE]
Hindu News reliable - Yes
Informed sources reliable - No

If a reliable newspaper is quoting from an unreliable source the paper's reliability will be questioned . If Hindu has to prove its reliability it has to authenticate the reliability of the Informed source bcoz even our neighbors NSA is confused over the reliability of this news 8-)
 
Last edited:
. .
When DRDO says that they tested the missile successfully, there is no need of any confirmation from any agency. We have never shied away from accepting our failure. One may find failed test videos of indian missiles on you tube.

This is a piece of yellow journalism. Nobody need to believe this. However, some idiots may become happy by reading this sort of news published in some remote corner of some some shit news papers. Who soever has published this news would have made a simple phone call to DRDO to confirm the realibility of the so called news.

@Windjammer ,

Now ask your media to stop whining.
 
.
But what kind of source you want to believe is something has to do with common sense . The Hindu and other prominent news media reports who confirmed with DRDO or some moron write some crap in his own blog ????

our political leaders and military establishments will be laughing at this article
But that article is also from the "prominent", The Hindu, news paper:
http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/interceptor-missile-mission-a-failure/article8634085.ece
:(
That is the problem, if it was "some moron write some crap in his own blog" it wont have been this problematic. Due to this being published in the same news paper that confirmed the success of the missile one day ago, there are some serious doubts now. This is the reason i said that perhaps the best way will be to wait further. It seems however that people here are hell bent to denounce one article of a paper and appreciate and recognize the other in the same paper. This is working BOTH ways!!
 
.
But that article is also from the "prominent", The Hindu, news paper:
http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/interceptor-missile-mission-a-failure/article8634085.ece
:(
That is the problem, if it was "some moron write some crap in his own blog" it wont have been this problematic. Due to this being published in the same news paper that confirmed the success of the missile one day ago, there are some serious doubts now. This is the reason i said that perhaps the best way will be to wait further. It seems however that people here are hell bent to denounce one article of a paper and appreciate and recognize the other in the same paper. This is working BOTH ways!!

The problem is there wouldnt be a whole other verdict right after the verdict was already given by DRDO. Anyone that's been even remotely following Indian missile programs will tell you how open they are about saying if it failed or succeeded - there is a consistency there. If they wanted to hide the fact it failed, dont even mention it succeeded in the first place. You wouldnt even know it happened.
 
.
The problem is there wouldnt be a whole other verdict right after the verdict was already given by DRDO. Anyone that's been even remotely following Indian missile programs will tell you how open they are about saying if it failed or succeeded - there is a consistency there. If they wanted to hide the fact it failed, dont even mention it succeeded in the first place. You wouldnt even know it happened.
True, and that makes such contradicting articles even more untrustworthy and the source becomes questionable in eye of a neutral for future as well.
 
.
But that article is also from the "prominent", The Hindu, news paper:
http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/interceptor-missile-mission-a-failure/article8634085.ece
:(
That is the problem, if it was "some moron write some crap in his own blog" it wont have been this problematic. Due to this being published in the same news paper that confirmed the success of the missile one day ago, there are some serious doubts now. This is the reason i said that perhaps the best way will be to wait further. It seems however that people here are hell bent to denounce one article of a paper and appreciate and recognize the other in the same paper. This is working BOTH ways!!
am still take this this with pinch of salt ...
 
.
This ABM is the precursor for ASAT systems. GoI will play it lightly for the time being.

Not exactly; an anti-ballistic missile requires significantly more sophisticated guidance systems owing to the fact that a reentry vehicle has far less predictability, in terms of kinematics and trajectory, than an orbiting satellite.
 
.
When DRDO says that they tested the missile successfully, there is no need of any confirmation from any agency. We have never shied away from accepting our failure. One may find failed test videos of indian missiles on you tube.

This is a piece of yellow journalism. Nobody need to believe this. However, some idiots may become happy by reading this sort of news published in some remote corner of some some shit news papers. Who soever has published this news would have made a simple phone call to DRDO to confirm the realibility of the so called news.

@Windjammer ,

Now ask your media to stop whining.
@vsdave2302
Well, The Hindu editor doesn't take phone calls however his office is of the opinion that they don't randomly publish any news without some credible verification, however they suggest any key board warriors finding it hard to digest can simply drop them an e-mail quoting their dilemma,
As for our media, albeit your media thrives on barking against Pakistan however i guess ours has picked up some bad habits from your ministry of defence.
 
.
9 out of 11 tests were successful. And there's surely no advantage of giving false news. Worse thing is that ET is citing about it's informed sources without any proof or base. :lol:
anyway, what was purpose.

, interceptor test was not even in a much noticed news, at least in India (nor we reported when somebody was crying about balance of power and now got this piece to get his soul in peace.)
whatever, We don't bother about it. Then or Now. :azn:
 
.
@vsdave2302
Well, The Hindu editor doesn't take phone calls however his office is of the opinion that they don't randomly publish any news without some credible verification, however they suggest any key board warriors finding it hard to digest can simply drop them an e-mail quoting their dilemma,
As for our media, albeit your media thrives on barking against Pakistan however i guess ours has picked up some bad habits from your ministry of defence.

See, you are free to do your wishful analysis. I only say that had our test failed, it would not have been declared a success. We had failures in past and they were invriabally declared failure without hiding anything. Even you will find our failed missile videos on you tube unlike some other countries who test some missile on one day declare them successful next day and deploy the them two days later.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom