What's new

Injured IAF MiG-21 Pilot Wins Landmark 2013 Case Against Govt, Court Orders Compensation

ashok321

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Nov 1, 2010
Messages
17,942
Reaction score
4
Country
Canada
Location
Malaysia

Implications for Make in India shik.


In a verdict that has big implications for the quality of defence manufacture in India, liability of manufacturers, flight safety and accident investigations, an injured Indian Air Force fighter pilot today defeated both Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd (HAL) as well as the Indian Ministry of Defence in the Delhi High Court. The pilot in question is Wing Commander Sanjeet Kaila, a MiG-21 pilot who couldn’t fly again owing to injuries sustained in a 2005 MiG-21 crash — an accident in which he stayed inside the doomed aircraft till the last moment in order to save a village on the ground.

The pilot’s court victory is significant for more than one reason. Apart from fixing accountability on HAL for the MiG-21 accident, Livefist has learnt the Delhi High Court has imposed costs on both HAL and the government. The case was filed by the officer against both in 2013 after he discovered that it was a manufacturing defect by HAL that contributed to the near fatal accident. The Indian Ministry of Defence, helmed at the time A.K. Antony had accused the pilot of hunting for compensation though Kaila and his lawyers had repeatedly informed the Delhi High Court that he was looking for accountability to be fixed, not monetary compensation.
 
HC grants ₹55 lakh to MiG-21 pilot
PTI
New Delhi May 02, 2017 21:36 IST
Updated: May 02, 2017 21:36 IST
THJC-MIGCRUSH


His jet crashed in 2005; relief granted for being exposed to ‘unreasonable risk’
A serving Indian Air Force pilot who was injured in a MiG-21 crash in 2005 was awarded ₹55 lakh as compensation by the Delhi High Court on Tuesday for being exposed to “unreasonable risk”.

Holding that manufacturing defects and faulty workmanship of the fighter jet had led to the crash, a Bench of Justices S. Ravindra Bhat and Deepa Sharma asked the government to pay ₹5 lakh and Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. (HAL) ₹50 lakh to Wing Commander Sanjeet Singh Kaila, 46, within four weeks.

Through his counsel Bharat S. Kumar, Mr. Kaila, who is now posted at Nasik, had sought compensation on account of “violation of his fundamental right to life, especially the right to work in a safe environment” under Article 21.

Seeks apology

He moved the High Court in 2013, seeking a direction to the Centre and the HAL to issue a formal apology. He sought guidelines for the manufacturing company to avoid such incidents in future.

Allowing his plea for compensation, the court noted that putting the officers of the armed forces above what was “expected to be normal risk” was against the fundamental right to life, especially the right to work in a safe environment guaranteed by the Constitution.

Poor record

The Bench said the HAL was liable to compensate him for “exposing him to more than reasonable risk”.

The Russian-origin fighter aircraft has been often referred to as the “Flying Coffin” and “widow-maker” because of its poor safety record.

It was the first time a crash survivor has taken on the government seeking redress. A regular flight exercise in 2005 went awry, leaving Mr. Kaila with debilitating neck and back pain that has rendered him unfit for flying and even day-to-day activities.

Making him fly a MiG-21, which crashed in Rajasthan on January 4, 2005, amounted to “violation of his fundamental right to life”, he had told the court earlier.

Goes up in flames

In his plea, Mr. Kaila had said he was posted at the Air Force Station Nal in Rajasthan as a Squadron Leader in 2005. On January 4 that year, he embarked on a regular flight exercise along with three other pilots.

“Immediately after take-off, the petitioner experienced a drift to the left side of the aircraft. Simultaneously, the petitioner was informed by the other pilot flying the second aircraft, of a fire at the rear end of his aircraft. Assessing the emergency, the petitioner promptly carried out all the essential directives and got the tyres of the aircraft down for a landing,” the petition had said.

“The petitioner performed all the aforementioned actions despite the rear of the aircraft being engulfed in thick fire. Despite a near-complete engine/control failure and at grave risk to his own life, the petitioner continued to stay put in an almost uncontrollable aircraft so as to steer it away to safety from a nearby village ... To save human life, the petitioner ejected only seconds before the crash of the aircraft.”

Mr. Kaila said following the incident, he was injured and later forced to discontinue flying after a comprehensive medical examination showed he was suffering from cervicalgia and disc bulges of the vertebrae (cervical spine).
http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/hc-grants-55-lakh-to-mig-21-pilot/article18357430.ece
 
I reckon the SC is going to quash the compensation...the precedent it would set would/could be scary for the IAF & HAL as it pertains to the MIG - 21.
 
We are still using 50 year old aircrafts:tsk: thus risking the lives of young fighter pilots.
We should scrap these Mig 21 ASAP and replace them with the much safer and modern Tejas. IAF red tape is a killer indeed:pissed:
 
We are still using 50 year old aircrafts:tsk: thus risking the lives of young fighter pilots.
We should scrap these Mig 21 ASAP and replace them with the much safer and modern Tejas. IAF red tape is a killer indeed:pissed:
Also manufactured by HAL
 
HAL is run by a bunch of lazy people who does not care about the life of young pilots who fly them
We must also retire these old birds asap
 
Tejas has zero mishaps in 3000 hours of flight testing, touch wood. There is a big difference between mig 21 and Tejas.
we in pakistan hope that you induct these in massive numbers but sadly your airforce thinks Tejas is worse than a MIG21 which was at least inducted in numbers
 
HC grants ₹55 lakh to MiG-21 pilot
PTI
New Delhi May 02, 2017 21:36 IST
Updated: May 02, 2017 21:36 IST
THJC-MIGCRUSH


His jet crashed in 2005; relief granted for being exposed to ‘unreasonable risk’
A serving Indian Air Force pilot who was injured in a MiG-21 crash in 2005 was awarded ₹55 lakh as compensation by the Delhi High Court on Tuesday for being exposed to “unreasonable risk”.

Holding that manufacturing defects and faulty workmanship of the fighter jet had led to the crash, a Bench of Justices S. Ravindra Bhat and Deepa Sharma asked the government to pay ₹5 lakh and Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. (HAL) ₹50 lakh to Wing Commander Sanjeet Singh Kaila, 46, within four weeks.

Through his counsel Bharat S. Kumar, Mr. Kaila, who is now posted at Nasik, had sought compensation on account of “violation of his fundamental right to life, especially the right to work in a safe environment” under Article 21.

Seeks apology

He moved the High Court in 2013, seeking a direction to the Centre and the HAL to issue a formal apology. He sought guidelines for the manufacturing company to avoid such incidents in future.

Allowing his plea for compensation, the court noted that putting the officers of the armed forces above what was “expected to be normal risk” was against the fundamental right to life, especially the right to work in a safe environment guaranteed by the Constitution.

Poor record

The Bench said the HAL was liable to compensate him for “exposing him to more than reasonable risk”.

The Russian-origin fighter aircraft has been often referred to as the “Flying Coffin” and “widow-maker” because of its poor safety record.

It was the first time a crash survivor has taken on the government seeking redress. A regular flight exercise in 2005 went awry, leaving Mr. Kaila with debilitating neck and back pain that has rendered him unfit for flying and even day-to-day activities.

Making him fly a MiG-21, which crashed in Rajasthan on January 4, 2005, amounted to “violation of his fundamental right to life”, he had told the court earlier.

Goes up in flames

In his plea, Mr. Kaila had said he was posted at the Air Force Station Nal in Rajasthan as a Squadron Leader in 2005. On January 4 that year, he embarked on a regular flight exercise along with three other pilots.

“Immediately after take-off, the petitioner experienced a drift to the left side of the aircraft. Simultaneously, the petitioner was informed by the other pilot flying the second aircraft, of a fire at the rear end of his aircraft. Assessing the emergency, the petitioner promptly carried out all the essential directives and got the tyres of the aircraft down for a landing,” the petition had said.

“The petitioner performed all the aforementioned actions despite the rear of the aircraft being engulfed in thick fire. Despite a near-complete engine/control failure and at grave risk to his own life, the petitioner continued to stay put in an almost uncontrollable aircraft so as to steer it away to safety from a nearby village ... To save human life, the petitioner ejected only seconds before the crash of the aircraft.”

Mr. Kaila said following the incident, he was injured and later forced to discontinue flying after a comprehensive medical examination showed he was suffering from cervicalgia and disc bulges of the vertebrae (cervical spine).
http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/hc-grants-55-lakh-to-mig-21-pilot/article18357430.ece

Nice example. Defence Personnels are are also Humans.
 
we in pakistan hope that you induct these in massive numbers but sadly your airforce thinks Tejas is worse than a MIG21 which was at least inducted in numbers
Sad indeed. How can the indigenous defence programs progress if the armed forces reject every single indigenous production.
 
Sad indeed. How can the indigenous defence programs progress if the armed forces reject every single indigenous production.

why do you think the airforce doesn't want it? corruption or is it a poor aircraft
 
Back
Top Bottom