striver44
BANNED
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2016
- Messages
- 4,832
- Reaction score
- -16
- Country
- Location
correct me if I'm wrong,i believe it to be ss-1 rifle with silencer. concerning the size of our Air Force, it's critical that this small fleet of jets equipped with the best munitions available to ensure combat effectiveness, and contrary to popular believe of real ground war with our enemy, the main threat coming our way currently is a naval confrontation with our neighbours so it's critical that our fighter jets together with our naval components halt or destroy the enemy as far as possible out at sea, this is not possible by using loitering munitions.First which rifle this women is carrying secondly first your Air Force need to increase its size. Right now your Air Force is not good you need at least 250 latest Fighter Jets not just hardly 70 or 80. Secondly this can be great answer towards enemy moving armor brigades and also stationary infrastructure
yes I understand, but given the relatively small amount of our military budget, I think we should PRORITIZE, loitering munitions are good news if purchased but then you have to think at a broader terms, since our Air Force most of the time rely on unguided munitions which have limited combat effectiveness compared to guided one.army =/= air force... they have different procurement... they seek different things..
i'm quite aware of that, but most of our military programs are going at a slow phase, remember when we said that we are going to launch sattelites using homemade launch vehicle/rocket and there's no update till nowI say we should look further into the opportunity to acquire such advance weapons system like the N-LAWS with WS-43 loitering munition. I think this is more effective than smart bomb and bring more tactical advantage to the table.
For the smart boms, Pindad and BPPT already getting their hand on it trying to produce some working prototype to be tested. No need to choose one over another, we should have both.