Good that you started focussing on topic, instead of trolling with Leclerc, merkava, al-khalid
The design is excellent much much better than Soviet and Chinese light tank designs.
If you say so. Its your opinion against experts.
So you are saying Krauss-Maffei of germany did not designed the tank??
The turret is well suited for best operational scenario and its well tested in all conditions. In tests its seen that its much better suited than other tanks for the crews. The driver and loader has no problem. All the modern tanks are designed like that except Chinese.
Maybe thats the reason army was rejecting repeated, untill they also got tired of the repeated circus.
The FCS is one of the best in its class. The ballistic computer developed by DRDO well performed in desert conditions.
No doubt each component sourced from different vedor is good in its class....but we are talking about interated result here.
Loading time is better than other comparable tanks.
No Boilerplate
Quantify
lol in every tank operate like that including Abrams.
No need to take cover against Abrams, we are talking here.....
Refute it with data and source
Its optimised for heavy protection against all types of weapons. it was also tested against point bank range fires.
Thats Bull, it was old vintage 80's concept. The anti-armour technology has improved exponentially since.
Not correct few cm doesn't change anything. also there are larger tanks than Arjun is fielded.
Seems, it does to professionals
Its best among contemporary tanks of Arjun's level. Also the hydro suspension gives better accuracy and crew comfort.
There are no contemporary of arjun's being fielded. All 70-80's designed tanks are thrown as junk or upgraded to todays standard.
Arjun seems to have struck in TIME.
Above all most of the earlier problems were resolved.
I showed they are as much present , if still stuck ask again.