What's new

India's Two-Front War Plans

Simple, keep aksai chin and withdraw ur other claims on arunachal pradesh and parts of uttarakhand,in any case the local people there hate u.Settle dispute.No cedeing of territory on either side.We will not kowtow to chinese pressure,this is not phillipines.

hey tell that to the chinese i'm justing giving what the situation is like. it's unlikely they be moved by the stance.
 
Fact:
New Deli is 500km from China.
China has almost 2000 missiles that has the range over 500km.
How many kilometer is New Deli from border?

How does it matter... its not like ..you can fight against Indian armour in the plains..as your own armour and can not cross the Himalayas..as far firing missiles at civillian ..is cowardice!!.. it neither gives you any military advantage ..nor can it win you the war.

Werent same tactics used by Hitler with his V1, V2 , Luftwaffe against London??..and we all know how that ended!!
 
Why would you? After all you're an Indian. :lol:

Well then as you preach in other thread that CIA is conducting drone strikes because ISI knows about it, so does it mean your government sold its own people?
 
That is the difference between China and India border, and India and Pakistan border. Both countries have moved away from the disputes and are much more mature in solving their issue with talk rather than on gun point. Both sides realized that they can't have the land the other is governing and are fine with it. Both governments relation have improved, and it shows of a positive future, doesn't matter what as internet warriors we might say. The relationship has improved greatly since the 1960 and 70's era.

The problem with the Indo-China borders is logistics and infrastructure which is in Chinese advantage but the the logistics is what makes the war a nightmare.

why would India attack and kill chinese troops in India pak war :undecided:

it can be china which can try some misadventure. India is well prepared in AP, its not like '62 when we had few border troops there.

there are chinese military engineers in pakistani kashmir it depends on what the situation is but unlikely another war for kashmir.
 
why would India attack and kill chinese troops in India pak war :undecided:

it can be china which can try some misadventure. India is well prepared in AP, its not like '62 when we had few border troops there.

Last time we captured some brigade commanders. Maybe we can fish some generals or Marchals.
 
Say that to the South Tibetans, are these folks belong to your race?

Mostly being conquered after a territorial subjugation. :coffee:

Say that to the tibetians setting themselves on fire,they certainly don't identify with ur kind and its brutal occupation.
 
no one replied my previous post...

I don't know about that.

Nehru certainly tried to take advantage in 1962 with the Forward Policy, immediately after we had just come out of a horrific famine (Great leap forward).

If they see blood they will try to bite, it's still the same Nehru-Gandhi family that is ruling India today.

So according to you Nehru tried to take advantage in 1962, when indian military was virtually non existent?

what a retard :lol:

That's because you guys were so afraid of us, that you waited until Winter when all the passes were blocked with snow. :lol: Which will no longer work in the era of modernized warfare.

Believing that just such an Indian attack was imminent, Nixon encouraged China to mobilise its armed forces along its border with India to discourage it. The Chinese did not, however, respond to this encouragement, because unlike the 1962 Sino-Indian War when India was caught entirely unaware, this time the Indian Army was prepared and had deployed eight mountain divisions to the Sino-Indian border to guard against such an eventuality

Bangladesh Liberation War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


After the 2008 Mumbai attacks, India threatened Pakistan with "surgical strikes". But despite Mumbai being blasted several times after that, why didn't India do anything?

because thats the most economical are reasonable course of action

Blocking the strait will be a rightful excuse for us to sink that old crappy carrier with our ASBM.

in 1971 a navy tried to sink our aircraft carrier. do u know what happened to them?

India could freely bark at anytime if they want, but they should also remember that their firecrackers could likely be bursted before hitting Pakistan, while in a real exchange, Pakistan might return some high yield explosive nukes back to their cities. :coffee:

india does not depend on nuked for its wars despite what the fanboys say. it depends entirely on conventional weaponary.
 
How does it matter... its not like ..you can fight against Indian armour in the plains..as your own armour and can not cross the Himalayas..as far firing missiles at civillian ..is cowardice!!.. it neither gives you any military advantage ..nor can it win you the war.

Werent same tactics used by Hitler with his V1, V2 , Luftwaffe against London??..and we all know how that ended!!

London got bombed into pieces. Thank you.

Don't worry after a hard days work the IA loves to have chinese for supper.

Good for you. Wish you guys a good appetite in our POW camp.
 
The power balance between China and India has long been shifting in our favour.

1990 - China GDP : India GDP - 1:1
2000 - China GDP : India GDP - 2:1
2010 - China GDP : India GDP - 4:1

Indians are always overconfident because they feel they have been rising in strength relative to the rest of the world. Yes, that is true.... but relative to China, their power has actually been decreasing every year.

India claims Chinese land (Aksai Chin) as a part of Kashmir. There is no choice about whether to be involved or not, they have already made us involved. If they start messing around with Azad Kashmir and Gilgit Baltistan they are directly challenging our territorial integrity, since they also claim Aksai Chin as a part of it.

India knows that it cannot get the territory that it claims from China. So, in all probabilities, in case of any future india pakistan conflict, India would be prepared to provide guarantee to China to not interfere in its disputed regions or obstruct China's energy routes.

After that, the question is, would China risk intervening on behalf of pakistan and suffering considerable damage in return? Remember there are no "brother" relations but just relations based on strategic interests.
 
Last time we captured some brigade commanders. Maybe we can fish some generals or Marchals.

first try to spell 'marshal' correctly.

last time we were high on hindi-chini bhai bhai dope. we had no defences at place. you tried your luck in 1967 too but failed miserably
 
get off the high horse it's going to take more then days but years man internet warriors have no idea nor info on any it in actual war what will happen.

My answer was only in response to capturing generals,show respect get respect.Troll and u get trolling.
 
what a retard :lol:

Have you read the forum rules? I guess not. :cheesy:

(Don't worry, I won't report you).

india does not depend on nuked for its wars despite what the fanboys say. it depends entirely on conventional weaponary.

Your Indian Armed forces have already admitted that: "India cannot hope to match China by conventional OR non-conventional means".

Neither one works for you. And don't you remember the recent revelation that India only has 2 days worth of ammunition?
 
Back
Top Bottom