India's Two-Front War Plans

[NeutralCitizen]

I thought Saudi Arabia was an ally of Pakistan?

How come you are supporting India's position here?

pakistani's getting pro iran and saudis are just camel jockeys to them.

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

Yes, this is the reality. pakistan is just an alternative potential energy route of china to the middle east. The current route runs through indian ocean/malacca straits which is vulnerable to the indian navy. If india guarantees the safety of these routes it is unlikely china would go for any conflict on behalf of pakistan.

But i do agree china would supply pakistan with weaponry etc,.

Blocking the strait will be a rightful excuse for us to sink that old crappy carrier with our ASBM.

 

[LURKER]

They weren't all weather friends back then try to learn history, the chinese were aiding vietnam against americans not to mention the country was falling apart after the cultural revolution.

they did have good ties after 1962 conflict. china supported pak in 1965 war.

 

[AUSTERLITZ]

Like is said IN owns the indian ocean,IA won't allow a 3-1 advantage on ground to china and PLAAF doesn't have the quality to overwhelm indian air force in a defensive environment supported by sams.
And if it goes nukes we take down china,pakistan and its financer saudi arabia with us before we go.
That is simple and clear reality check,so keep dreaming about delhi.The only PA or PLA troops marching through delhi may be POWs.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

1962 was a brilliant strategic move because they strike china at its weakes point, this must be admitted. However, they either underestimated chinese morale or overestimated their own military.

At present china is vastly superior to india so, yes, India would not be foolish enough to initiate any conflict with china. situation is different from 1962.

If that is true, then peace will prevail.

However, as recently as 2008, India has been threatening to "strike" Pakistan after the Mumbai attacks.

Has the Nehru-Gandhi family really changed? The first Nehru also sang about peace, but did the opposite.

 

[King Solomon]

I've stated before all pakistan needs is to secure Relations with Afghanistan, Iran, and China the rest learn on how they failed in the past wars, it depends if the chinese naval or resources are threatened gwadar.

SCO with russia, china, india, pak, iran is the solution. Kashmir and other petty border issues should be solved for that to happen. And US is in afghanistan to prevent that to happen

 

[NeutralCitizen]

they did have good ties after 1962 conflict. china supported pak in 1965 war.

They had a neutral agreement with pakistan ceding land, no that was Iran not China, China hasn't supported pakistan in almost a single conflict due to pakistan was not important to them and they were laying low.

 

[IbnAlwaled]

I thought Saudi Arabia was an ally of Pakistan?

How come you are supporting India's position here?

No, we just used Pakistan when we needed them.
Now they have nothing to offer, we are focusing long term on the coming super power India, not the virtually bankrupt terrorist infested Pakistan.

 

[NeutralCitizen]

SCO with russia, china, india, pak, iran is the solution. Kashmir and other petty border issues should be solved for that to happen. And US is in afghanistan to prevent that to happen

Currently now the SCO seems the option for regional stability , Russia itself needs to complete the Eurasian union in order for the SCO to fully be completed.

 

[King Solomon]

I thought Saudi Arabia was an ally of Pakistan?

How come you are supporting India's position here?Also, India's own Armed Forces have acknowledged that they have less than 2 days worth of ammunition.

It is not a matter of supporting but rather stating the reality.

And that was a move to justify the increase in defense budget. Only naives would believe India has less than 2 day worth of ammunition.

 

[NeutralCitizen]

No, we just used Pakistan when we needed them.
Now they have nothing to offer, we are focusing long term on the coming super power India, not the virtually bankrupt terrorist infested Pakistan.

Correct, you stated this well when iran gets nuclear weapons to rain on Riyadh, the pakistani leadership should be smart on where the terrorism comes from.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

No, we just used Pakistan when we needed them.
Now they have nothing to offer, we are focusing long term on the coming super power India, not the virtually bankrupt terrorist infested Pakistan.

Real friends don't ditch others so easily.

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

If that is true, then peace will prevail.

However, as recently as 2008, India has been threatening to "strike" Pakistan after the Mumbai attacks.

Has the Nehru-Gandhi family really changed?

India could freely bark at anytime if they want, but they should also remember that their firecrackers could likely be bursted before hitting Pakistan, while in a real exchange, Pakistan might return some high yield explosive nukes back to their cities.

 

[NeutralCitizen]

Real friends don't ditch others so easily.

They were never friends the saudis use pakistani's as mercs or soldiers and use they resources the arabs want nuclear weapons but when pakistan denies them that they have no where to go.

 

[King Solomon]

Currently now the SCO seems the option for regional stability , Russia itself needs to complete the Eurasian union in order for the SCO to fully be completed.

SCO is more important than eurasian union. Military position needs to be secured first before embarking on any economic positionc.