India's right-wing leader asks China to end religious repression in Tibet

[ChinaToday]

Doing business doesn't mean they don't hold you in contempt and don't hate you!

Check out what they are saying about you here. Some Chinese members shared it earlier.

Korean Sentry :: View Forum - General Discussion & Gossips

Millions of Chinese are in USA, they don't seem to love it either.

we dont mind the world hated us , as long as pakistan loves us thats all we care

 

[Vinod2070]

don't waste your time please.
india is damn poor for a reason, if their citizens are all smart and well educated then their nation won't be that backwards then.

we should always appreciate the contribution done by the Singh regime, the regime is keeping the country stupid and poor, that is the best we can expect.

just ignor this guy he is in a fit right now after reading some of peaceful posts and not in the right state of mind for anything constructive.

There is no one more stupid and pathetic than you guys. Shows why you are still only copying and aping and why many African countries have a better standard of living than your shytholes.

 

[Vinod2070]

we dont mind the world hated us , as long as pakistan loves us thats all we care

So touching!

 

[peaceful]

Millions of Chinese are in USA, they don't seem to love it either.

really? then why most successful Chinese-Americans all moved back and now live permanently in China? because they hate China?

you can keep trolling, you can choose to believe whatever you want to believe, but let me tell you one thing:

1. a lot of countries hate us, that is true, just like a lot of people/countries hate the US. how many people/countries hate Mongolia? probabily zero, why? because there is no real future for Mongolia, no one cares about it.

2. does india really have a lot of friends? no, look back and see how commonwealth countries treated india during the commonwealth game. we will remember the dick s.h.i.t. joke from the NZ reporters.

let's just face it:

1. most middle east countries wants to be our friends, not because our technologies, not because we are nice poeple, because we are UNSC permanent members, they want our support.
2. Israel wants to have a very strong relationship with us, why? because they need our support in UNSC and want to access our market.
3. Thai, Malaysia, Singapore want more and more close ties with us, why? because we share the same culture background and they see us as a reliable trading partner.
4. EU is seeking more financial help from China, why? because we can help.

what india can do? threat Pakistan?

 

[ChinaToday]

this is widely observed by many independent researchers around the world.
it is published, reviewed by peers, with its methodology public available and the results are also provided to the community.

this is called undisputed results.

---------- Post added at 04:17 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:16 PM ----------



hated by our neighbours?

hahaha. you really believe russians like you?

no need to justify the importance of the iq test, indian members here already done that for you. see how touchy they are about this subject ,see the way they get so upset by it, the way they try everything to discredit it.Enough said

 

[Vinod2070]

Mr Hateful, let's not divert. You have made many claims here and have been asked some questions.

Let's see if you got it in you to answer them.

Or as expected you are just a gas bag!

 

[Urbanized Greyhound]

never done postgraduate level study?

this national IQ research is done by European researchers, the results, the methodology have been published and peer reviewed. I don't need to prove anything. if you don't agree with the results, then you need to prove it.

clear?

Who are these researchers ? Care to provide names and links , online versions of their "research papers " ?

Richard Lynn's bogus research and his flawed methodology has been debunked several times . Hell , for his 2006 book , IQ and global inequality he uses data from the most backward tribes in interior India and then calls it India's National IQ average . Like calculating the IQ of Australia's aboriginal population and then classifying it as Australia 's national avg IQ....hilarious...

 

[Urbanized Greyhound]

no need to justify the importance of the iq test, indian members here already done that for you. see how touchy they are about this subject ,see the way they get so upset by it, the way they try everything to discredit it.Enough said

Lol who cares what some bogus Researcher with a "soft corner " for Chinese writes about Indian IQ as long as we still have a 9.5- 10% economic growth

I still can't believe how some Chinese would just knowtow and kiss the hems of a white , if they throw in some complements are they so insecure ?

 

[ChinaToday]

Lol who cares what some bogus Researcher with a "soft corner " for Chinese writes about Indian IQ as long as we still have a 9.5- 10% economic growth

I still can't believe how some Chinese would just knowtow and kiss the hems of a white , if they throw in some complements are they so insecure ?

i know you kind of upset with this iq thing just chill out buddy take a glass of cold water and calm yourself down

 

[peaceful]

Who are these researchers ? Care to provide names and links , online versions of their "research papers " ?

Richard Lynn's bogus research and his flawed methodology has been debunked several times . Hell , for his 2006 book , IQ and global inequality he uses data from the most backward tribes in interior India and then calls it India's National IQ average . Like calculating the IQ of Australia's aboriginal population and then classifying it as Australia 's national avg IQ....hilarious...

then how about just tell me what is the average IQ in mumbai?
In Shanghai, the average IQ is 108.

no blah blah, just a number please.

 

[peaceful]

Lol who cares what some bogus Researcher with a "soft corner " for Chinese writes about Indian IQ as long as we still have a 9.5- 10% economic growth

I still can't believe how some Chinese would just knowtow and kiss the hems of a white , if they throw in some complements are they so insecure ?

9.5-10% economic growth? you got cheated by your regime again.

in China, and most civilized world countries, the GDP growth is measured by GDP at market price, india which tries to be the poster boy without hard working is using GDP at factor price. that is the reason why real economists say your growth is 8%, not 10%.

the regime can fool you, but it can't fool all economists.

 

[Vinod2070]

So Mr. hateful is exposed!

No answer to the questions raised, just posting crap IQ figures.

As always expected from these gas bags with no real depth. Shallow and pathetic!

 

[Bigoren]

There is no one more stupid and pathetic than you guys. Shows why you are still only copying and aping and why many African countries have a better standard of living than your shytholes.

Which African live better than China? Nigeria? If so,then Africa>China>india LOL.

 

[Vinod2070]

9.5-10% economic growth? you got cheated by your regime again.

in China, and most civilized world countries, the GDP growth is measured by GDP at market price, india which tries to be the poster boy without hard working is using GDP at factor price. that is the reason why real economists say your growth is 8%, not 10%.

the regime can fool you, but it can't fool all economists.

Mr. economist, do you even know the difference?

Which would be lower? The factor price or the market price?

Which would show a lower growth rate?

Do you know that IMF recently increased the Indian growth rate to 10.4 from 8% odd reported by India as they calculated it using market price!

You are just showing your typical foolishness, McDoctorate is not really helping!

BTW, where are the serial numbers?

 

[Vinod2070]

India edge past China in growth rate with 10.4% in 2010

According to data from the IMF, India’s GDP grew 10.4 per cent in 2010 versus China’s 10.3 per cent.

India outpaces China: Winning the growth World Cup | The Economist

India has two idiosyncrasies in the way it reports its GDP figures. First, it reports growth for the fiscal year, not the calendar year. So the 8.6% estimate refers to the 12 months ending on March 31. That in itself makes little difference. But the second idiosyncrasy is more important. India typically reports its GDP "at factor cost". That means it adds up all the income earned in the course of producing the country's goods and services. Other countries, including China, typically report their GDP "by expenditure", adding up all the spending on domestically produced goodies. Since every purchase is a sale, expenditure should equate to income: every rupee spent by one person is a rupee earned by someone else. But a couple of things get in the way: taxes and subsidies.

A sales tax adds to the amount you have to spend on a good. This boosts measures of GDP by expenditure, relative to income-based measures. A subsidy has the opposite effect.*

If these taxes and subsidies remained steady as a percentage of output, they would not affect the growth rate of GDP, even if they do affect its level. But in India net indirect taxes rose from 7.5% of output in 2009 to 9.2% in 2010, boosting the growth rate of GDP by expenditure for that year.** That was enough to lift India's growth by this measure to 10.36% in 2010. That's fully 0.06 percentage points faster than China.

Not knowing something is not necessarily bad. It is the stupid arrogance that accompanies it.