What's new

Featured India's investment in Afghanistan appears to be sinking: DG ISPR


In this file photo, a United States soldier from the 3rd Cavalry Regiment walks with the unit's Afghan interpreter before a mission. — Reuters

As US leaves Afghanistan, new regional 'Great Game' looms
Turkey is looking to position itself as a key international player but Russia, China and other states also see opportunities.
ReutersPublished 2 days ago
As United States troops quietly quit their last key bases in Afghanistan last weekend, Russian-backed Syrian forces were stepping up their bombardment and siege of Idlib and preparing for a possible closure of the last humanitarian crossing from Syria to Turkey.
It was a reminder of just how much the Middle East and South Asia have changed since Nato forces began their attempts to stabilise Afghanistan 20 years ago. As late as the Libya intervention in 2011 and against Islamic State as recently as 2019, the United States was still the key intervening power in conflicts, at least when it wished to be.
On rare occasions, that might remain the case even with the number of troops reduced to a few hundred in Iraq and Syria, plus now a similar sized detachment guarding the US embassy in Kabul. US air and naval forces remain significantly more powerful than any other player. On the ground where it counts, however, other players are now dominant, facing off for influence in a way that has already redefined the wars in Libya and Syria.
Indeed, whether America itself really knows what role it wants to play remains unclear. Institutionally, the US military and many agencies of the US government have been embroiled in the Mideast and Afghanistan for so long they may inevitably wish to remain engaged. The domestic and other drivers to pull back, however, are becoming ever stronger.
Editorial: Now that US has quit Bagram, it is only fair to ask whether its mission has been accomplished
Going forward in Afghanistan, the ongoing presence of US and British troops guarding their respective embassies is largely dependent on a Turkish deal to retain control of Kabul airport, now likely to become the only other significant international presence in the country.
As in multiple other conflicts, Turkey is looking to position itself as a key international player but Russia, China and other states also see opportunities to increase influence and mitigate risks.
China in Pakistan, Russia in Tajikistan
For China, that means deepening discussions with long-term partner Pakistan and the authorities in Kabul, reportedly including a potential motorway from the Afghan capital to Peshawar in Pakistan's Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. That could revolutionise the region and significantly antagonise India but would require a very different security situation.
Russia's closest central Asian ally, Tajikistan, on Wednesday requested Moscow's support to secure its mountainous border with Afghanistan. Moscow has its own history in Afghanistan, but as in the Middle East, it is unlikely to pass up an opportunity to supplant the United States and has stepped up diplomatic and military outreach across Central Asia.
According to local media reports, some of Afghanistan's most significant roads now pass through Taliban control and 15 of Afghanistan's 34 regional capitals are now largely encircled by the militants, including the key northern city of Mazar-i-Sharif. US intelligence estimates cited by US media predict the Afghan government itself could fall in six months to a year although with Afghan troops already said to be melting away in some areas, any unravelling could come faster.
Read: Taliban gains drive Afghan government to recruit militias
In Libya, Syria, Iraq and Yemen, Washington remains involved to various degrees but other nations are now often more influential. That has particularly benefited Russia, which now has a significant presence in Syria and Libya supporting its much more assertive naval forces in the eastern Mediterranean. Regional dynamics are more complex still, benefiting smaller powers.
Largely unreported wars
In Libya, where Washington and its Nato allies marshalled an ad hoc coalition to oust Muammar Gaddafi in 2011, the war is now a complex fight between elements backed by foreign powers including Russia, Turkey, the United Arab Emirates, Egypt, France and others, in part driven by a desire for oil and gas reserves.
In Syria, where the United States retains a modest military presence in some oil-rich Kurdish areas, the primary drivers of the conflict now include a much broader confrontation between the Russian-backed regime of Bashar al-Assad and Turkey, which controls some areas along the border with its own troops and Turkish-backed militias.
As well as shaping the war on the ground with troops and air power since its intervention began in 2015, Russia has also used its veto at the United Nations to control diplomatic actions on Syria, including the latest potential border closure.
In contrast to 2011, developments in these conflicts are now barely covered by international media. Activities of US forces are also much more unreported with little clarity, for example, over reported explosions at a US base in Syria this week.
Indeed, many of the key developments in US-Mideast relations such as the visit to Washington this week of Saudi Deputy Defence Minister Prince Khalid bin Salman go largely unreported or at least officially unannounced. The same goes for an uptick in US strikes against Iranian-backed forces in Iraq earlier this month, one country where the United States remains more involved than expected after withdrawal of combat troops but has also seen its power fade.
See: America's longest war, in pictures
What happens next in Afghanistan may go similarly largely ignored. Most coverage so far has focused on what the United States and Britain might do next, not what is happening on the ground. Whether Turkey can control the international airport may come down to whether it is able to strike a deal with a dramatically resurgent Taliban but the details of that and whether or not it truly happens may also barely be reported.
That doesn't mean multiple countries will not be paying attention. The West might wish Afghanistan had ceased to exist once its troops are no longer there, but in many ways the 21st-century “Great Game” for influence there is only just beginning.
Twitter Share
Facebook Count




12 COMMENTS
EMAIL
PRINT


The views expressed by this writer and commenters below do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Dawn Media Group.
Afghan forces retake provincial capital after Taliban incursion: Afghan defence ministry
Afghan forces retake provincial capital after Taliban incursion: Afghan defence ministry
America's longest war, in pictures
America's longest war, in pictures
Vacated by Americans, Kabul's Bagram Air Base bustles again as Afghans move in
 
Lol. I get banned for having opinion on PDF, that is not anyhow a measure of trolling. You are dumb idiot to think so.
If that's the case then why do you return over and over? How boring is your life?
Pakistanis have the habit of speaking out of turn and embarrassing themselves at the end. I mean we all remember how Joe biden was good for Pakistan and discussion we had on the topic on PDF. As long as your economy is weak, your say in matters related to neighbors will be weak.
Did you invest something in Afghanistan? :lol:
 
When Taliban takes control of Afghanistan, the Tajiks, Uzeks etc. will go to their countries of origin in Central Asia. They will never come to Pakistan. Historically, the refugees in Pakistan are of Pushtun origin.
But doesn't that have an adverse effect on Pak too?
 
If that's the case then why do you return over and over? How boring is your life?

Did you invest something in Afghanistan? :lol:
Lol. Why, you can't take an opinion contrary to yours? How boring is your life to force yourself to reply to me dumbo?
 
  • Maj Gen Iftikhar says India acted "in bad faith" and is now "disappointed".
  • DG ISPR maintains Pakistan has no “favourites” in Afghanistan; it is up to Afghans to decide how they want to take Afghanistan forward.
  • Says Pakistan had already ramped up Pak-Afghan border security and management because of situation in Afghanistan.
Director General of the Inter Services Public Relations (ISPR) Major General Babar Iftikhar on Saturday said that "India’s investment in Afghanistan appears to be sinking”.

“If India had invested in Afghanistan in good faith, then it would not have been disappointed today,” said the DG ISPR in a conversation with a private TV channel.

The head of the military’s media wing said that India's goal was to harm Pakistan by stepping into Afghanistan.

He added that New Delhi was trying to tell the world that Pakistan is the “cause of problems in Afghanistan”.

Maj Gen Iftikhar said that there was no truth to the claims made by India, adding that "the world knows that Pakistan has tried its utmost to solve the Afghan problem in the best possible manner”.

'Early withdrawal of US troops’
The DG PISPR, who spoke at length about Afghanistan and Pakistan’s response to the situation there, also spoke of the role played by the US.

“The only expectation from the United States was that there would be a responsible withdrawal from Afghanistan,” said the DG ISPR. He explained that by a responsible withdrawal he meant a proper transfer of authority and lamented that the withdrawal by the US forces “was done a little early”.

The DG ISPR also responded to the rumours circulating in the media on American bases in Pakistan. The DG ISPR said that the Pakistani government had made it clear that there was no question of giving bases to the US as there is no need for it.

'Border management should have also been done on the Afghan side'
The head of the military’s media wing regretted the lack of work done by the Afghan government on border management with Pakistan.

“Border management should have been done on the other side as well, but unfortunately that has not been done,” said the DG ISPR. However, he assured the nation that Pakistan is determined to not allow anyone to use its soil against another country.

"We will not allow any unwanted people to enter the country," he said.

Maj Gen Iftikhar said that border management was needed as everyone knows that Daesh and the TTP are in Afghanistan and have occasionally tried to harm interests.

He assured everyone that security at the country’s border with Afghanistan was much better today. He added that additional Frontier Corps wings have been formed to further enhance the security at the border.

The DG ISPR said that 90% of the fencing on the Pak-Afghan border was complete.

He also said that the interior ministry has made plans to deal with the influx of refugees in case violence escalates in Afghanistan.

‘Pakistan sincerely spoke about advancing Afghan peace process’
Maj Gen Iftikhar stated that Pakistan sincerely spoke about advancing the Afghan peace process as troop withdrawal was announced by the then US president Donald Trump.

"Pakistan has no favourites in Afghanistan.

“What kind of government they seek and how they want to take Afghanistan forward is up to the Afghans,” said the DG ISPR.

He also assured everyone that Pakistan will try to resolve the deadlock if the Afghans have reached that position.

“If Afghans are at a deadlock then we too are working to resolve it. But even we have our limitations and we can only advance things to an extent,” said the DG IPSR.

He added that international stakeholders know that Pakistan has made sincere attempts to resolve the Afghan conflict.

The major general said that Afghans have the ability to sit down and decide on the future they want for their country.

“The direction of things to happen will be determined by the internal situation in Afghanistan.

“Decisions such as these cannot be forced with the use of guns. If that was the case, then it would have happened in these 20 years that have passed,” said Maj Gen Iftikhar.

The DG ISPR warned that decisions will have to be made through talks or the situation may go towards a civil war. He added that no one would benefit from civil war and it would only harm the whole region.

“All factions in Afghanistan are tired of the 40-year violence,” he said.


No, we have made dams and hospitals,and many development work & infrastructure, these investment will be remain useful for afghani brothers..
 
No, we have made dams and hospitals,and many development work & infrastructure, these investment will be remain useful for afghani brothers..
They are not your brothers , just like the Kashmiris are not your brothers.
 
They are not your brothers , just like the Kashmiris are not your brothers.

Begaane shaadi me abdulla diwana... Just came to my mind.

Afghani were our brothers & sisters and will be.

Kashmiri are our real blood brothers and we can not donate kashmir Or kashmiri to anyone.. Others are free to try & do adventure if they want. Just suggestions, read about the previous adventures and conclusions.
 
Begaane shaadi me abdulla diwana... Just came to my mind.

Afghani were our brothers & sisters and will be.

Kashmiri are our real blood brothers and we can not donate kashmir Or kashmiri to anyone.. Others are free to try & do adventure if they want. Just suggestions, read about the previous adventures and conclusions.
You are so right , after 600 years of Afghan invaders breeding with your forefathers you are bound to be related to them , so I can understand why you call them your brother and sisters.
 
You are so right , after 600 years of Afghan invaders breeding with your forefathers you are bound to be related to them , so I can understand why you call them your brother and sisters.

Afghan also invaded to Pakistan then the same reason you might called them brothers..

But, we had and have a sweet & trusted relationship like brothers, and the reason we called Afghani as "Brothers and Sisters"

 
Afghan also invaded to Pakistan then the same reason you might called them brothers..

But, we had and have a sweet & trusted relationship like brothers, and the reason we called Afghani as "Brothers and Sisters"

I don't call them my brothers or sisters, I call them my Muslim brothers and sisters, that's a big big difference.
 
No secret India has been providing military training to Afghan security forces and supporting NDS against Pakistan and has been trying to squeeze into and bribe their way into Afghanistan through infrastructure projects and soft NGO projects throwing ample money into Afghan hands. All this investment India made has gone into the wind and it is highly unlikely that India will see a return on their investments.

Indians have been actively engaged in acts of terrorism against Pakistan by training and funnelling weapons to the Afghan Gov. India’s goal was to have a long term foot hold using anti-Pakistan sentiment in the Afghan Gov. The result has been anti-Indian Taliban have carried out attacks against Indian targets in Kabul and they have been instrumental in pushing Indian nationals out of Afghanistan, including attacks on the Indian Embassy and Gurdwara resulting in numerous Indian casualties.

As the collapse of Kabul is imminent the Indians are desperately trying to leverage a position in Afghanistan using Iran and China, but so far have been given the cold shoulder. Iran has seen Indian double play when it came to the sanctions crunch and India sided with the Western Allies. China’s is cold towards India because of the recent border dispute and has it’s own eyes on Afghanistan’s natural resources and has been bargaining away deals with the Afghan gov. India has suffered huge political and strategic cost by it’s skewed double faced policy in Afghanistan. Fascist India has shown it has no love for Muslims and it’s hand of peace is covered in Kashmiri and Palestinian blood and the Taliban are fully cognizant of this fact. The result has been desperate panicking Indians fleeing Afghanistan and sporadic attacks on Indian nationals.

The fall of the Afghan gov won’t be rapid as some folks are hoping and a cornered ANA will make a last stand. The Taliban are not in a hurry either, they have been patient for the last 20 years and another year won’t make a difference. The Taliban have time on their hands and as vast swathes of Afghanistan become under their control the Afghan people will realise that they are not as bad as they were made out to be and will revel in the pervading law and order that Taliban rule brings. The collapse of the Kabul is inevitable and only a matter of time and no amount of bombings will prevent it.
 
Last edited:
I don't call them my brothers or sisters, I call them my Muslim brothers and sisters, that's a big big difference.

For me - Does not matter if they are Hindu, Muslim, Sikh or any.....

Love and friendship don't care about anything, Also it does not care about face, region, the cast, or the color of skins.
 
For me - Does not matter if they are Hindu, Muslim, Sikh or any.....

Love and friendship don't care about anything, Also it does not care about face, region, the cast, or the color of skins.






What about loving over 732 million of your fellow indians who defecate in the open....... :azn::


 
For me - Does not matter if they are Hindu, Muslim, Sikh or any.....

Love and friendship don't care about anything, Also it does not care about face, region, the cast, or the color of skins.
Ask the BJP fanatics and the massacred Indian Muslims if it matters to them.
 
Back
Top Bottom