I wasn't debating, I was explaining. Read that post again slowly, to udnerstand my point. Clearly it was lost on you.If so then why 're we debating here?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I wasn't debating, I was explaining. Read that post again slowly, to udnerstand my point. Clearly it was lost on you.If so then why 're we debating here?
Don't need to, I have read most of his works long back. What he is describing there is WRONG. I wouldn't blame him forr that, because he was working with very little data. What he has written there is what everybody in the ancient times believed - that everything falls towards the earth, because the earth attracts everything. Aristotle thought that the tendency of earth is to move things down, the tendency of fire is to raise things up, and something similar for wind and water. You don't need a Brahmagupta or an Aristotle to tell you that things fall down - even our prehuman ancestors knew that.
What Newton did was that he radically changed this idea. That's right, he disproved the notion that "all heavy things fall down to the earth by a law of nature,..." (From your quote.)
Newton instead showed that EVERYTHING attracts everything else. The earth does, the moon does, you do, your computer does, etc. It is not that everything tends to fall "down" - it is that everything attract each other. The earth is no special in that. From there he also developed a mathematical model, an equation to calculate how much each thing attracts another thing. That is when it became a theory.
BTW, the words "all heavy things" in that quote also exposes a common misunderstanding. It's not just heavy things, bt light things also fall, and at exactly the same rate.
It's Newton's theories that brought our understanding of gravitation to a new level. The ancients saw things fall down, and assumed that the earth makes everything fall down. Newton changed such notions. BTW, Newton's theory itelf had to be slightly refined later, by Einstein. That is how scientific understanding progresses - step by step, from no understanding to complete understanding.
South Indian talking about mohenjodaro n Harappa .. O LOrD!
Butt Sb try reading Indus Saha by Aitezaz Ahsan...
Auntie, Indus Valley Civilization didn't begin in Delhi !
It began along the River Indus and thats in Pakistan and Occupied Pakistan aka J&K !
LOL. I see.
So I guess since Harappan civilization was so advanced for its time, there is no way that Europeans or Americans should have more knowledge of aeronautics today, right?
That's why Europeans are requesting transfer of technology from us for these things.
But chacha you are an Arabi
did it started from from md bin Qasim?Yaaar I'm reading History of Pakistan: Pakistan Through the Ages by Professor Ahmed Hasan Dani - the archaeologist who actually excavated most of these sites !
Its a very....very interesting read !
pakistan history begins with invasion of muhhamad bin qasim... not at harrapaAuntie, Indus Valley Civilization didn't begin in Delhi !
It began along the River Indus and thats in Pakistan and Occupied Pakistan aka J&K !
did it started from from md bin Qasim?
pakistan history begins with invasion of muhhamad bin qasim... not at harrapa
Goddamn, I don't even know how to reply to this hot air. Never mind, I'm not here to argue - I wanted to explain some things, and I have done so.The modern day science has contributed very little and most of the contributions are newtonian. When you go to core, the theories change. This is due to mathematical modelling.
Look mate. I really mean no offence, honestly - but I request you to stop talking about things you clearly have no knowledge of.Now there is a conflict that Big Bang never happened. You can never compact the big bang in mathametical modelling because that requires some experiments and on earth it is not possible with current progress for the next one Millennium.
Isn't observation enough to understand what is happening? The modern day science has contributed very little and most of the contributions are newtonian. When you go to core, the theories change. This is due to mathematical modelling.
Now there is a conflict that Big Bang never happened. You can never compact the big bang in mathametical modelling because that requires some experiments and on earth it is not possible with current progress for the next one Millennium.
I asked my professor about size of this universe, being more than what it should be if max speed taken as speed of light., he is one of the boards of members in nuclear physics group of professors in germany. He said, I believe what I see, of course I believe in God. But Quantum Physics is something which cannot be proven unless Human has access to that massive energy and those masses to mathematically build a model. Lots of contradictions will come.
Have you read Nehru's Discovery of India?Yaaar I'm reading History of Pakistan: Pakistan Through the Ages by Professor Ahmed Hasan Dani - the archaeologist who actually excavated most of these sites !
Its a very....very interesting read !
so adam and eve?The book ? No it starts from the archaeological evidence that was found from the 'early man' in this part of the world - Cave drawing nears Rohri Hills and in the caves beyond Golra Sharif (near Islamabad) !
Okay !
Auntie, Indus Valley Civilization didn't begin in Delhi !
It began along the River Indus and thats in Pakistan and Occupied Pakistan aka J&K !
Have you read Nehru's Discovery of India?
Yaaar I'm reading History of Pakistan: Pakistan Through the Ages by Professor Ahmed Hasan Dani - the archaeologist who actually excavated most of these sites !
Its a very....very interesting read !