What's new

Indians held in US for selling missile parts

Neo

RETIRED

New Recruit

Joined
Nov 1, 2005
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
April 05, 2007
Indians held in US for selling missile parts

WASHINGTON, April 4: Two Indian nationals have been arrested in the US for illegally exporting American missile technology to India but the State Department says this will not affect the India-US nuclear deal.

Reports in the US media, however, say that the case could undermine congressional support for the deal.

The Indian head of a US electronics supplier and three employees have been indicted for shipping controlled US computer technology with missile applications to India.

Parthasarathy Sudarshan, founder and chief executive of Cirrus Electronics, appeared in the US District Court in Washington on Tuesday and pleaded not guilty to charges that include export violations, international arms trafficking and conspiracy.

The US Justice Department said that Mr Sudarshan and Mythili Gopal, the company's international sales manager, were arrested in South Carolina on March 23.The pair allegedly shipped to India Static Random Access Memory computer chips that are designed to withstand extreme temperature changes and have applications for missile guidance systems.

The indictment states that these chips were shipped without a required export licence. Other related equipment was described as high-technology capacitors, semiconductors and resistors-all with missile applications.

They also illegally exported US components, including the i960 microprocessor, to help India develop its Tejas light combat aircraft.

The items were shipped between 2003 and 2006 to Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre, Bharat Dynamics and the Aeronautical Development Establishment -- key state agencies in India's missile and aerospace sector.

Exports to those firms in India require licences from the US Department of Commerce on national-security grounds.

Mr Sudarshan and Mr Gopal allegedly used false documents about the recipients to ship the components to India through Cirrus offices in South Carolina and Singapore.

The indictment said Cirrus made the illicit shipments working closely with an unidentified Indian Embassy official in Washington who was not charged. The official helped arrange the illicit purchase of 500 of the i960 microprocessors.

Two other Cirrus employees, Akn Prasad in Bangalore and Sampath Sundar in Singapore, have also been indicted.

In Washington, State Department spokesman Sean McCormack told reporters that he did not see why the case should impact the Indo-US nuclear deal. “I don’t see any connection between these two things,” he said.

http://www.dawn.com/2007/04/05/top12.htm
 
.
Interesting, I wish Joey was here to debate the smuggled parts. I believe the LCA microprocessor was claimed to be a homegrown design :P
 
.
This microprocessor is for missiles, not for aircraft.
 
.
This microprocessor is for missiles, not for aircraft.

It's a processing chip, used in missiles and aircraft like in the MMR radar for LCA and it's also used in '90s HUD systems. US NAVY also uses it on some aircraft. Also, know China will soon get some chip making factories from Intel, since they invested $4.2 Billion dollars recetly. But also, this tech is old and new advanced chips are being used.

Navy scuttling MIPS processor in favor of Intel - MIPS Computer Systems R4000 microprocessor, Intel Corp. 80960
Electronic News, April 20, 1992 by Jack Robertson

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- The Navy has dropped the MIPS Computer R4000 RISC microprocessor, one of two mandatory Joint Integrated Avionics Working Group (JIAWG) standard computers for all future aircraft, in favor of the other, Intel's i960 microprocessor, for the upcoming AX attack plane, sources here said last week.

Moreover, the Navy reportedly will ask the joint service JIAWG panel at its next meeting to drop the MIPS microprocessor entirely, making the Intel i960 MPU the single avionics standard. The Navy is making the Intel device a de facto standard for the AX, according to industry and military sources.

The Navy selection of the Intel i960 was driven by a nearunanimous win of the Intel device to date for almost all JIAWG-mandated platforms. The Air Force F-22 Advanced Tactical Fighter (ATF) and the Army AH-66 LX helicopter and AH-64 Longbow helicopter upgrade all use Intel i960-based computers. The Navy reportedly believed this would provide such a large production and logistics-support base that using the same MPU for the AX would cut life-cycle costs sharply.

The only MIPS R4000-based computer to win a JIAWG competition was used by Texas Instruments for the General Dynamics F-16 Midlife Upgrade. The fate of that modernization program is caught up in budget deliberations. Even with that JIAWG victory, however, TI reportedly is separately developing an Intel i960-based avionics processor to be ready to compete for the Navy AX mission processor.

Another MIPS R4000 computer vendor, Control Data Corp., confirmed last week that it is developing an alternative Intel processor for the upcoming AX competition.

The Navy had not replied by press time with a comment on the report. Aircraft bidders, avionic computer firms, and MIPS and Intel spokespersons either declined to comment, or could not be reached due to plant closings for the Easter holiday.

Ironically, despite the pending MIPS R4000 loss on the AX aircraft, that RISC processor could still end up on the interim F/A-18 E/F upgrade that would fill the Navy's attack mission until the AX is deployed early in the next century. The incumbent F/A-18 computer supplier, CDC with its AN/AYK-14 Navy standard airborne computer, has proposed upgrading to a so-called Advanced AN/AYK-14 that would add the MIPS R4000 as a coprocessor.

The CDC proposal has some strong backers within the Navy, since the Advanced AN/AYK-14 would capture all the existing F/A-18 software using the MIPS coprocessor for new Adacode programs for the enhanced interim aircraft.

Other factions, however, are pressing to adopt the JIAWG standard for the interim F/A-18E/F version, claiming this would give the Navy plane the same state-of-the-art technology as the Air Force ATF, and could be transitioned easily into the follow-on AX.

To add to the confusion, it isn't clear that the proposed F/A-18E/F interim attack version will survive present DOD cost-cutting moves. However, avionics firms believed that even if the full F/A-18E/F upgrade is scrubbed, the Navy would still upgrade computers in the present version of the plane. That would likely favor CDC as the incumbent computer supplier.

Computer bidders for the AX so far are believed to include i960 stalwarts Hughes Aircraft (supplier for the F-22), Westinghouse (supplier for the AH-66 LX and AH-64 Longbow), TI and CDC.

AT&T, which missed the ATF computer award as part of the losing bid by Northrop/McDonnell Douglas, hasn't been visible in the present marketing battle courting AX prime contenders. It was unclear if AT&T's ATF partner Paramax (formerly Unisys Defense Systems) was contending for the AX computer role. Both AT&T and Paramax had bid MIPS-based architecture in the losing ATF bid.

IBM, a dominant military aircraft computer firm, also hasn't been seen actively in the ongoing AX marketing push. The firm, however, is known to have developed an i960 avionics computer inhouse.

http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EKF/is_n1908_v38/ai_12198735
 
. .
Interesting, I wish Joey was here to debate the smuggled parts. I believe the LCA microprocessor was claimed to be a homegrown design :P

The processor was used on Su-30 MKI avionics first,then for the LCA.
If the processor were shipped around 2003-2006,how come they were used on MKI, whose production started before 2000?
 
.
The processor was used on Su-30 MKI avionics first,then for the LCA.
If the processor were shipped around 2003-2006,how come they were used on MKI, whose production started before 2000?

Please, proivde sources cause I doubt Americans will allow it to be used with Russian planes, and I have yet to find any sources that say it was used on SU-30MKI, I have lots of sources saying LCA does only.

Russian, France and Israel don't use i960 rather they have their own (domestic) or a different TI or Intel chip.

Cause as far as I know MKI doesn't use it.
 
.
Please, proivde sources cause I doubt Americans will allow it to be used with Russian planes, and I have yet to find any sources that say it was used on SU-30MKI, I have lots of sources saying LCA does only.

Russian, France and Israel don't use i960 rather they have their own (domestic) or a different TI or Intel chip.

Cause as far as I know MKI doesn't use it.

I did not say MKI uses i960. I am saying the contrary. Neo pointed that LCA doesn't use Indian designed processor. Hence I pointed out that LCA uses the same processor that was used on MKI. And MKI DOES NOT use Russian avionics. It has Indian designed processing unit.

Hence the point is if LCA uses processor similar to MKI,how come the report says LCA uses i960 which was shipped from 2003-2006. MKI production started before 2000,which means the processor was present before the reported shipment of i960.
 
.
Interesting, I wish Joey was here to debate the smuggled parts. I believe the LCA microprocessor was claimed to be a homegrown design :P

I'm ready to debate those products are not smuggled, it is simply a thing Cirrus messed up or US screwed us again.

Let me explain I think i have told here and in different forums million times and you get to know about reports from Acig that LCA doesnt uses home grown processor.

It uses COTS products, the Radar MMR uses power PC , now we all know Power PC is designed by APPLE and is a US company isnt it? , but those processrs are so abudant in market you dont have to worry about it.

Similarly this i960 processor is a old fart, used in printers of 90's.

Some doubts to be cleared;

1> VSCC doesnt designs missiles and is entirely different entity than DRDO.
2> Those processors was meant for NPOL , Naval oceanographic and lab; if ADA used it and Cirrus was to smuggle it why would they show NPOL as end user?

The MMR no longer relies on i960 processors. The separate signal & data processor with the i960 plus ASIC dependent signal processor has been replaced with a combined SDP with regular Sharc and blackfin ones. The LCA uses i960 processors for the DFCC (Digital flight control computer), ie the Quad FBW dabba.

Issue might arise for SHARC processor as well but I hope it is legally imported and they cannot stop it as it is developed in India.

This paragraph is coming from someone who was in the design team of Sharc and Blackfin,

************************
The Sharc processors are completely designed and tested in India, end-to-end. The only place where a gora comes into the picture is during the financing approvals (I work in the sharc design team). Manufacturing is outsourced to a Taiwan company since there are no fabs here. But I am confident our management will seriously consider manufacturing the chips here once the likes of Semindia starts operations and comes up to the competitive levels.

Most of the Blackfin work is also done here, only the silicon testing is done
in the US.

A recent media coverage about the sharc processor.
http://www.hinduonnet.com/2006/07/23/stories/2006072301691100.htm
************************************

Designing a DSP is abc for indian engineers but problem is with its numbers and economic feasibility to do so. As you dont use P4s or Athlons but embedded low powered microcontrollers generally between 33MHz to 100MHz in speed normally i486 or Motorola 68XXX architectures or RISC's like ARM/MIPS/AMD 29000/PowerPC[We use power pc chips a lot]. These usually don't produce too much heat.the chips are encased in ceramic DIPs with gold plating on top to conduct heat but that was back at a time when chips are built with big micron sizes.With gradual reduction in micron sizes power use is extremely small and so is heat generation. Mission computers in the F-16 MLU for example uses the R3000 chips which has a better known application aka the cpu of the original playstation.

These COTs products are rampantly used by China as well.

The defence chip production in IndiA is handled by SCIL

SCL upgradation project soon

BANGALORE: Upgradation work on the erstwhile public sector enterprise Semiconductor Complex (SCL) could finally start in the next two months. A decision on the winning bid for the global tender to undertake the upgradation of India’s first semiconductor fab is expected in next two-three weeks.

Consortiums led by IBM and M&W Zander, Atmel & Nano Tech Silicon India and UK-based Kember Associates are in the race for the Rs 500 crore project. According to sources, initial formalities with regards to the final winner is expected in the next two-three weeks.

The upgradation should begin in about two months and is scheduled to be completed in 18 months from that date, they added. The loss-making PSU which came under the Department of Electronics had been transferred to the Department of Space (DoS) in March 2005 and global bids were invited by DoS in September 2006 for the project.

According to officials, DoS and ISRO are planning to rejuvenate SCL by converting its current 0.8 micron capability (which is old technology) to 0.25 micron or 0.35 micron based capability.

The focus will be on research into newer technology as well as making chips for its own needs and for high reliability activities of the country. Semiconductor chips that go into electronic components form about 25-30% of a satellite and about 10% of a launch vehicle. Currently many such components are imported.

ISRO chief Madhavan Nambiar has been quoted as saying, ``these are available commercially but we feel that in the long run, we should have our own technology.’’

SCL was set up in Chandigarh in 1983, India’s first tryst with fabs. Its objective was to design, develop and manufacture VLSIs and VLSI based systems and sub systems and R&D.

The current facility is capable of processing wafers in 0.8 micron technology. The fab is upgradable to 0.6 micron technological capability and has a 100,000 wafers per annum processing capacity.

Some more data if your interested;

http://www.iisc.ernet.in/insa/ch31.pdf
http://www.electronicsforu.com/EFYLinux/efyhome/cover/March2006/Anupama-1.pdf

From first link:

A landmark toward self-reliance in microprocessor technology has been achieved through development of ANUCO, a floating-point coprocessor and a 32-bit RISC processor ANUPAMA. Its processing speed is being further enhanced from 33 MHz to 350 MHz.

A facility has been created to lead to fabrication of Gallium Arsenide wafers and Monolithic Microwave Integrated Circuits (MMICs) in 1-18 GHz range. Under a co-operative venture with other S&T Departments and Industry, DRDO has contributed in setting up a silicon foundry which
has the potential of making the country independent of foreign sources in respect of most of the VLSI requirements

BANGALORE, FEB 22: The Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) will be setting up two foundries to assemble advanced materials denied to the country by foreign powers, according to scientific advisor to the defence minister, A P J Abdul Kalam.

Speaking at a function at the Indian Institute of Science (IISc) here last night, Kalam disclosed that one foundry would be to fabricate gallium arsenide wafers, while the other would produce VLSI microelectronics.

Stating that every denial was an opportunity for India to develop indigenous technology, Kalam recounted that he had toured the United States in 1986, along with the then advisor to the defence minister, V S Arunachalam, in search for a supercomputer to design missiles for the country. ``But the journey was in vain,'' he said.

This denial made the country develop its own supercomputers and the current speed achieved by the DRDO machine `Pace' was eight gigaflops, he said, pointing out that it would reach 30 gigaflops by the yearend.

Referring to the recent American regulation regarding export of supercomputers to some countries like India, he said that India didn't need to import two gigaflop systems (the limit fixed by the regulation), when eight gigaflop machines were being developed indigenously.

Besides, for defence applications, the country had developed a system called `Advanced Numerical Processor for Airborne and Missile Applications' (ANUPAMA), he said, adding, ``My dream is that we should give supercomputers to all the countries who are denied these machines by the west.''

Here is a part of Anurag,
http://img294.imageshack.us/my.php?image=dsc03467nz4.jpg

This is US policy , but fear not as LCA Tejas one scientist says;

"You deny us technology We make it better than you have" , which has been proved number of times; I can show you articles of his speech on how flight performance is actually much better than when we were using US design VISTA.

The main article is this;

Posted 04/09/07 16:09
Export Charges May Affect Indian-U.S. Ties
By VIVEK RAGHUVANSHI, NEW DELHI

Indian government officials are wondering how the U.S. Justice Department’s April 2 indictment of four Indian nationals on charges of violating technology export-control laws will affect defense ties and the nuclear cooperation accord between Washington and New Delhi.

Singapore-based Cirrus Electronics, which has a U.S. office in Simpsonville, S.C., and four of its employees were indicted on charges of illegally selling computer chips for missile guidance systems and microprocessors for the Indian Air Force’s Light Combat Aircraft to India.

The alleged sales violated the Arms Export Control Act and International Traffic in Arms Regulations.

The four Cirrus employees — Prathasarathy Sudarshan, Mythili Gopal, both of Simpsonville; Akn Prasad of Bangalore; and Sampath Sundar of Singapore — were arrested by the FBI March 30. If convicted, they face prison sentences ranging from five to 10 years.

“This is very serious,” said a U.S. Justice Department spokesman.
Missile guidance technology was being sold to the Indian government entities that operate India’s aerospace and nuclear weapons programs. There is evidence that the Indian government was helping falsify information to enable the exports, and an Indian Embassy official in Washington is an unnamed co-conspirator, the spokesman said.

“This case clearly demonstrates that the United States will aggressively investigate and prosecute those who illegally procure and export components for space launch vehicle and ballistic missile programs,” said Darryl Jackson, assistant secretary for export enforcement at the U.S. Commerce Department. The sales allegedly took place between 2002 and 2006.

The incident is an embarrass-ment to the Indian government, said a senior Indian Ministry of Foreign Affairs official. However, ministry spokesman Navtej Sarna said they are looking into the matter and have no comment.

“Yes, these allegations will have an impact on transfer of futuristic technology to India from the United States,” said Rahul Bhonsle, a defense analyst here and a retired Indian Army brigadier. “Hopefully, it will not change the overall approach of U.S. authorities of placing India in a more benign category of sanctions.”

But Cherian Samuel, senior fellow at the Institute of Defence Studies and Analysis here, downplayed the significance.

“Industrial espionage and high-tech theft are par for the course, even between the U.S. and its closest allies, such as Israel,” Samuel said. “There is a possibility that the timing of the announcement of this indictment is a part of the carrot-and-stick approach favored by the U.S. government in its foreign policy dealings, and a gentle reminder that it would serve India well to get the nuclear deal through so that it could get such technologies without too much trouble. “

Brahma Chellaney, a defense analyst at the Centre for Policy Research here, was critical of Washington’s attempts to control the flow of technologies.

“The U.S. still maintains greater technology controls against the world’s largest democracy than against communist China,” Chellaney said. “The latest case shows that instead of loosening high-tech controls against India, U.S. authorities are doing the reverse — cracking down even on exports to India that do not have military applications, such as Static Random Access Memory, capacitors, semiconductors, rectifiers and resistors. Such exports are permitted by the U.S. to Israel. So why not to ‘strategic partner’ India?”

Sudarshan, founder of Singapore-based Cirrus Electronics, and Mythili Gopal, a top executive, allegedly exported to India heat-resistant computer chips that can be used in missiles, micro-processors and semiconductors.

These items were allegedly to be used by the Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre, which does civilian space work; the Aeronautics Development Establishment, which builds the Light Combat Aircraft; and defense contractor Bharat Dynamics, said the indictment.

But the question that begs to be answered is, why were these technologies allegedly stolen when they could have been acquired legally from the United States?

“Probably, the Indian establishments just took the easy way out or did not want to go through the delays envisaged in procedures for such equipment,” said Bhonsle.


The main point is this;

There is a possibility that the timing of the announcement of this indictment is a part of the carrot-and-stick approach favored by the U.S. government in its foreign policy dealings, and a gentle reminder that it would serve India well to get the nuclear deal through so that it could get such technologies without too much trouble.

There is a backdoor CTBT clause in the nuke deal which the whole scientific community is against and is negotiating with each sentence with US.

Recently Pranab mukherjee suffered a suspicious accident as well, the only nationalistic congress leader the foreign secretary.





anyways this is all good, recently this year SEMINDIA has announced of having a wafer factory at the cost of 5bn dollars.

With 125 companies doing chip designing in India there is a need to feed govt sector as well.

We have highly capable VLSI workforce, the 1tflop intel chip to Apple ipods chip all done here.

The SCIL is being upgraded as well.

The best thing that made this happened is the immediate switch to eurocopter over bell :D

I want US to put more and more sanctions, We dont lack anything other than the need of governments will to fund and fund.
 
.
american labs are cookiejar...whoeva find no security, put hand in their....Indian,Chinese,Korean,Japnese...etc
 
.
oh and just to remind you about the embedded processor situation in India, India is designing a Supercomputer with 1petaflop power means 1024 Teraflops, If done will be worlds fastest computer.

Man whos designing it is,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narendra_Karmarkar

Go and read any honest LCA article all says it uses COTS processors or provcessors like power pc which is abudantly available in the market.Never did i claimed it uses home grown processors, it uses home grown processors in certain LRU's , but some like DFCC which uses regular architecture simply uses off the shelf processor.

Processors like i960 which are available in old printers, blocking them shows the US insecurity.

I give a damn to it, just wait one year till SEMIndia finishes the fab lab and SCIL gets upgraded.

Hopefully the govt will design own DSP and introduce in home companies like videocon et al as it doesnt takes economic feasibility to design a DSP for sole defence use.
 
.
american labs are cookiejar...whoeva find no security, put hand in their....Indian,Chinese,Korean,Japnese...etc

not really, for once I'm ready to admit with vision less netas and babus our industrial espionage capability is 100xtimes less than chinese, even though both countries remain the most contributors towards US economy.

I wish this wasnt 80's i960 procyy's rather DDX blueprint :chilli:
 
.
Posting in full for NEO again (hugs neo hes my new boy friend)

Interesting, I wish Joey was here to debate the smuggled parts. I believe the LCA microprocessor was claimed to be a homegrown design :P

I'm ready to debate those products are not smuggled, it is simply a thing Cirrus messed up or US screwed us again.

Let me explain I think i have told here and in different forums million times and you get to know about reports from Acig that LCA doesnt uses home grown processor.

It uses COTS products, the Radar MMR uses power PC , now we all know Power PC is designed by APPLE and is a US company isnt it? , but those processrs are so abudant in market you dont have to worry about it.

Similarly this i960 processor is a old fart, used in printers of 90's.

Some doubts to be cleared;

1> VSCC doesnt designs missiles and is entirely different entity than DRDO.
2> Those processors was meant for NPOL , Naval oceanographic and lab; if ADA used it and Cirrus was to smuggle it why would they show NPOL as end user?

The MMR no longer relies on i960 processors. The separate signal & data processor with the i960 plus ASIC dependent signal processor has been replaced with a combined SDP with regular Sharc and blackfin ones. The LCA uses i960 processors for the DFCC (Digital flight control computer), ie the Quad FBW dabba.

Issue might arise for SHARC processor as well but I hope it is legally imported and they cannot stop it as it is developed in India.

This paragraph is coming from someone who was in the design team of Sharc and Blackfin,

************************
The Sharc processors are completely designed and tested in India, end-to-end. The only place where a gora comes into the picture is during the financing approvals (I work in the sharc design team). Manufacturing is outsourced to a Taiwan company since there are no fabs here. But I am confident our management will seriously consider manufacturing the chips here once the likes of Semindia starts operations and comes up to the competitive levels.

Most of the Blackfin work is also done here, only the silicon testing is done
in the US.

A recent media coverage about the sharc processor.
http://www.hinduonnet.com/2006/07/23/stories/2006072301691100.htm
************************************

Designing a DSP is abc for indian engineers but problem is with its numbers and economic feasibility to do so. As you dont use P4s or Athlons but embedded low powered microcontrollers generally between 33MHz to 100MHz in speed normally i486 or Motorola 68XXX architectures or RISC's like ARM/MIPS/AMD 29000/PowerPC[We use power pc chips a lot]. These usually don't produce too much heat.the chips are encased in ceramic DIPs with gold plating on top to conduct heat but that was back at a time when chips are built with big micron sizes.With gradual reduction in micron sizes power use is extremely small and so is heat generation. Mission computers in the F-16 MLU for example uses the R3000 chips which has a better known application aka the cpu of the original playstation.

These COTs products are rampantly used by China as well.

The defence chip production in IndiA is handled by SCIL

SCL upgradation project soon

BANGALORE: Upgradation work on the erstwhile public sector enterprise Semiconductor Complex (SCL) could finally start in the next two months. A decision on the winning bid for the global tender to undertake the upgradation of India’s first semiconductor fab is expected in next two-three weeks.

Consortiums led by IBM and M&W Zander, Atmel & Nano Tech Silicon India and UK-based Kember Associates are in the race for the Rs 500 crore project. According to sources, initial formalities with regards to the final winner is expected in the next two-three weeks.

The upgradation should begin in about two months and is scheduled to be completed in 18 months from that date, they added. The loss-making PSU which came under the Department of Electronics had been transferred to the Department of Space (DoS) in March 2005 and global bids were invited by DoS in September 2006 for the project.

According to officials, DoS and ISRO are planning to rejuvenate SCL by converting its current 0.8 micron capability (which is old technology) to 0.25 micron or 0.35 micron based capability.

The focus will be on research into newer technology as well as making chips for its own needs and for high reliability activities of the country. Semiconductor chips that go into electronic components form about 25-30% of a satellite and about 10% of a launch vehicle. Currently many such components are imported.

ISRO chief Madhavan Nambiar has been quoted as saying, ``these are available commercially but we feel that in the long run, we should have our own technology.’’

SCL was set up in Chandigarh in 1983, India’s first tryst with fabs. Its objective was to design, develop and manufacture VLSIs and VLSI based systems and sub systems and R&D.

The current facility is capable of processing wafers in 0.8 micron technology. The fab is upgradable to 0.6 micron technological capability and has a 100,000 wafers per annum processing capacity.

Some more data if your interested;

http://www.iisc.ernet.in/insa/ch31.pdf
http://www.electronicsforu.com/EFYLinux/efyhome/cover/March2006/Anupama-1.pdf

From first link:

A landmark toward self-reliance in microprocessor technology has been achieved through development of ANUCO, a floating-point coprocessor and a 32-bit RISC processor ANUPAMA. Its processing speed is being further enhanced from 33 MHz to 350 MHz.

A facility has been created to lead to fabrication of Gallium Arsenide wafers and Monolithic Microwave Integrated Circuits (MMICs) in 1-18 GHz range. Under a co-operative venture with other S&T Departments and Industry, DRDO has contributed in setting up a silicon foundry which
has the potential of making the country independent of foreign sources in respect of most of the VLSI requirements

BANGALORE, FEB 22: The Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) will be setting up two foundries to assemble advanced materials denied to the country by foreign powers, according to scientific advisor to the defence minister, A P J Abdul Kalam.

Speaking at a function at the Indian Institute of Science (IISc) here last night, Kalam disclosed that one foundry would be to fabricate gallium arsenide wafers, while the other would produce VLSI microelectronics.

Stating that every denial was an opportunity for India to develop indigenous technology, Kalam recounted that he had toured the United States in 1986, along with the then advisor to the defence minister, V S Arunachalam, in search for a supercomputer to design missiles for the country. ``But the journey was in vain,'' he said.

This denial made the country develop its own supercomputers and the current speed achieved by the DRDO machine `Pace' was eight gigaflops, he said, pointing out that it would reach 30 gigaflops by the yearend.

Referring to the recent American regulation regarding export of supercomputers to some countries like India, he said that India didn't need to import two gigaflop systems (the limit fixed by the regulation), when eight gigaflop machines were being developed indigenously.

Besides, for defence applications, the country had developed a system called `Advanced Numerical Processor for Airborne and Missile Applications' (ANUPAMA), he said, adding, ``My dream is that we should give supercomputers to all the countries who are denied these machines by the west.''

Here is a part of Anurag,
http://img294.imageshack.us/my.php?image=dsc03467nz4.jpg

This is US policy , but fear not as LCA Tejas one scientist says;

"You deny us technology We make it better than you have" , which has been proved number of times; I can show you articles of his speech on how flight performance is actually much better than when we were using US design VISTA.

The main article is this;

Posted 04/09/07 16:09
Export Charges May Affect Indian-U.S. Ties
By VIVEK RAGHUVANSHI, NEW DELHI

Indian government officials are wondering how the U.S. Justice Department’s April 2 indictment of four Indian nationals on charges of violating technology export-control laws will affect defense ties and the nuclear cooperation accord between Washington and New Delhi.

Singapore-based Cirrus Electronics, which has a U.S. office in Simpsonville, S.C., and four of its employees were indicted on charges of illegally selling computer chips for missile guidance systems and microprocessors for the Indian Air Force’s Light Combat Aircraft to India.

The alleged sales violated the Arms Export Control Act and International Traffic in Arms Regulations.

The four Cirrus employees — Prathasarathy Sudarshan, Mythili Gopal, both of Simpsonville; Akn Prasad of Bangalore; and Sampath Sundar of Singapore — were arrested by the FBI March 30. If convicted, they face prison sentences ranging from five to 10 years.

“This is very serious,” said a U.S. Justice Department spokesman.
Missile guidance technology was being sold to the Indian government entities that operate India’s aerospace and nuclear weapons programs. There is evidence that the Indian government was helping falsify information to enable the exports, and an Indian Embassy official in Washington is an unnamed co-conspirator, the spokesman said.

“This case clearly demonstrates that the United States will aggressively investigate and prosecute those who illegally procure and export components for space launch vehicle and ballistic missile programs,” said Darryl Jackson, assistant secretary for export enforcement at the U.S. Commerce Department. The sales allegedly took place between 2002 and 2006.

The incident is an embarrass-ment to the Indian government, said a senior Indian Ministry of Foreign Affairs official. However, ministry spokesman Navtej Sarna said they are looking into the matter and have no comment.

“Yes, these allegations will have an impact on transfer of futuristic technology to India from the United States,” said Rahul Bhonsle, a defense analyst here and a retired Indian Army brigadier. “Hopefully, it will not change the overall approach of U.S. authorities of placing India in a more benign category of sanctions.”

But Cherian Samuel, senior fellow at the Institute of Defence Studies and Analysis here, downplayed the significance.

“Industrial espionage and high-tech theft are par for the course, even between the U.S. and its closest allies, such as Israel,” Samuel said. “There is a possibility that the timing of the announcement of this indictment is a part of the carrot-and-stick approach favored by the U.S. government in its foreign policy dealings, and a gentle reminder that it would serve India well to get the nuclear deal through so that it could get such technologies without too much trouble. “

Brahma Chellaney, a defense analyst at the Centre for Policy Research here, was critical of Washington’s attempts to control the flow of technologies.

“The U.S. still maintains greater technology controls against the world’s largest democracy than against communist China,” Chellaney said. “The latest case shows that instead of loosening high-tech controls against India, U.S. authorities are doing the reverse — cracking down even on exports to India that do not have military applications, such as Static Random Access Memory, capacitors, semiconductors, rectifiers and resistors. Such exports are permitted by the U.S. to Israel. So why not to ‘strategic partner’ India?”

Sudarshan, founder of Singapore-based Cirrus Electronics, and Mythili Gopal, a top executive, allegedly exported to India heat-resistant computer chips that can be used in missiles, micro-processors and semiconductors.

These items were allegedly to be used by the Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre, which does civilian space work; the Aeronautics Development Establishment, which builds the Light Combat Aircraft; and defense contractor Bharat Dynamics, said the indictment.

But the question that begs to be answered is, why were these technologies allegedly stolen when they could have been acquired legally from the United States?

“Probably, the Indian establishments just took the easy way out or did not want to go through the delays envisaged in procedures for such equipment,” said Bhonsle.


The main point is this;

There is a possibility that the timing of the announcement of this indictment is a part of the carrot-and-stick approach favored by the U.S. government in its foreign policy dealings, and a gentle reminder that it would serve India well to get the nuclear deal through so that it could get such technologies without too much trouble.

There is a backdoor CTBT clause in the nuke deal which the whole scientific community is against and is negotiating with each sentence with US.

Recently Pranab mukherjee suffered a suspicious accident as well, the only nationalistic congress leader the foreign secretary.





anyways this is all good, recently this year SEMINDIA has announced of having a wafer factory at the cost of 5bn dollars.

With 125 companies doing chip designing in India there is a need to feed govt sector as well.

We have highly capable VLSI workforce, the 1tflop intel chip to Apple ipods chip all done here.

The SCIL is being upgraded as well.

The best thing that made this happened is the immediate switch to eurocopter over bell :D

I want US to put more and more sanctions, We dont lack anything other than the need of governments will to fund and fund.
 
.
As joey said teraflop chip with 80 core processor

Bangalore: Intel India Develoment center (IIDC)along with Intel Oregon co-developed the 80-core teraflop chip. The IIDC handled more that 50 percent of the chip development.

The chip has a powerful programmable processor that can undertake trillions pf calculations per second, consuming only 62 watts of power.

"The multi-core chip with greater computing horse power can be used for diverse research applications such as scientific experiments, weather forecasting, astronomical calculations, oil exploration, financial services, entertainment and personal media services involving huge data processing and number-crunching," Intel India research centre director Vittal Kini said at a preview of the product in Bangalore.

Collaborating with Intel's technology group's circuit research lab at Oregon in the US, the 20-member Indian research team headed by engineering manager Vasantha Erraguntla played a central role in developing the teraflops research chip in a record 20 months.

The engineering team of IIDC contributed about 50 percent of the work consisting of logic, circuit and physical design, while the Oregon centre undertook integration and fabrication of the chip at the company's fab in Ireland.
http://www.hyperionreactor.net/node/218
 
. .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom