kurup
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2012
- Messages
- 10,563
- Reaction score
- -2
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They need something a LOT better than these tired looking, un armoured and underpowered Gypsys.
yes.. hope they will brought some... but i never saw any pics of garuds using helmets.Still havent seen Garuds with proper helmets so far.
They need something a LOT better than these tired looking, un armoured and underpowered Gypsys.
It needs to be replaced (and is being) by the ENTIRE Indian military including the SFs, this is just taking a lot longer than envisaged. Just because it is a strike vehicles doesn't mean it can't be armoured, it can still be open top and have armoured protection. The Gypsy in the role it is currently being used in is totally unacceptable.they uese that as a strike vechicle,,, and generally SF don't use armored vehicles. Gypsys are very common in indian military.. para SF also use it.
Not really, the only area they seem to be tangibly ahead is in posing for cameras:air force SF looks better equipped than SFs of navy and army.
Not really, the only area they seem to be tangibly ahead is in posing for cameras:
They are the youngest SF with little actual combat experience (as a unit) and it shows.
And I thought you meant the big one on the right....For the SF ofcourse
Any true SF operator will shy away from the camera, the general adage used for SFs around the world is "silent professionals" and the PARA (SF) have said (which the Garuds alluded to) that they like to let their work speak for themselves and they don't like to be in the public eye.For the SF ofcourse
Any true SF operator will shy away from the camera, the general adage used for SFs around the world is "silent professionals" and the PARA (SF) have said (which the Garuds alluded to) that they like to let their work speak for themselves and they don't like to be in the public eye.
This is what being SF is all about, not posing for selfies
I'm not saying they should be covering their faces (although some will do in other situations depending on where they are deployed) but they shouldn't be smiling and posing for pictures with civilians either.garuds are not a secret unit. they are like indian air force's pararescue. they don't need to cover their face. that unit deployed in aero india is the base protection unit of garuds. gauds don't operates in undercover or they don't need to fight an insurgency like marcos, para sf or NSG doing. their is noting secret in garuds peacetime operation except their trainnig and equipments.
Indian media..
That guy was awesome, always came across very articulate and informed, I quite liked his interaction with (then) Indian COAS Bikram Singh, even though he was raising a thorny issue he did so with a lot of grace and in a respectful manner.Probably the best defence/war correspondent is Wajahat S Khan... His ste of writing is quiet impressive...
That guy was awesome, always came across very articulate and informed, I quite liked his interaction with (then) Indian COAS Bikram Singh, even though he was raising a thorny issue he did so with a lot of grace and in a respectful manner.
I have a lot of time for that guy, although I hear his defence specials were cancelled for some reason.