Windjammer
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2009
- Messages
- 41,319
- Reaction score
- 181
- Country
- Location
Actually, it's habitual for Indians to divert topics to run away from the original arguments.
Yes, now the comprehension issues are cropping up.
Prove this, my friend:
PAF has four IL-78 on strength, not a big fleet, three were seen rehearsing for Pakistan Day Parade in March.
Surely one would be performing it's required normal duties.
You need to update yourself, for about 15 years up until 2005, PAF F-16s were under sanctions, even then the PAF F-16 fleet achieved a milestone which few airforces can boast about and certainly IAF can't even with any twin engine on strength.Our Il-78s have taken part in numerous week long exercises where it was quoted by USAF and others that they had excellent maintainence and serviceability and suffered almost no mishaps.So we are fully confident about their capability,you better worry about the serviceability of your old f-16s.Are they even at 50%?
As for your cheap shot, let me remind you the same fleet has been thoroughly upgraded and not under any sanctions....
F-16 Fighting Falcon News
Pakistani F-16s reach 100,000 accident free flight hours
http://www.f-16.net/f-16-news-article1468.html
No, but still our single engine have a better safety record than your twin engines....compare the history and crash record of your SU-30s and Jaguars....yep and those planes are still flying in your frotline squadrons
And according to RAF, the IAF is like a game of cricket, who take pride in even shooting down balloons.according to us most of PAF isn't flying except for some show flights. Indian intelligence says don't be concerned.