Thats actually incorrect. The uterus DOES NOT float inside the body. This is a myth thats around on the internet and has been around since before the Industrial revolution. Nonsense is what it is.
In reality, The uterus is located inside the pelvis immediately dorsal (and usually somewhat rostral) to the urinary bladder and ventral to the rectum. The uterus is primarily supported by the pelvic diaphragm, perineal body and the urogenital diaphragm. Secondarily, it is supported by ligaments and the peritoneum (broad ligament of uterus)
Thats from wiki.
And women can actually withstand higher G forces, like I explained previously.
I dont get angry at opposing opinions. I get angry at retarded and unscientific comments.
I dont need a survey of 6 billion people. Its a fact that women live longer on an average. Its a fact that they have lesser body mass. Its a fact that their hearts stress much less. Think about this in another way ignoring science for a moment. Women bear babies. So their bodies do have to be a little bit more perfect than a man's.
And I am not talking about fat women or fat men. Fat people cant serve in the military.
And yes, I am talking about equal training. Am not talking about less training for women. That should never be the case. In the army we advocate certain standards and if women QUALIFY they should be able to serve. Of course a lot will fail, but this doesnt mean they shouldnt. But this is in the Army.
As for the airforce, for the 4th or 5th time, yes the female body can indeed withstand more G force - given they are healthy and well exercised.
Alright, I admit that using "float" was a bad way to describe it. The fact remains that the uterus needs to expand to accommodate a baby so it is not held as tightly as other body organs. If it was then it would not be able to hold a full size fetus.
You talked about providing scientific evidence, and then you made a bunch of broad generalizations. So should I get angry at you and call you a bunch of names now?
Where is the evidence that women can handle higher G-forces?
And if this is true then why are women subjugated to lower requirements in training?
When you say retarded things like "Women are more fit than men" then you do need a survey. fitness is based on personal choices and ability, where you chose to eat, how much you chose to work out, where you live, etc etc all have an affect on this. By saying "women are more fit than men" you just sound really dumb.
Lower body mass is not indicative of fitness, lower body fat is... and guess what, by your own standards women are now less fit because on average women have higher body fat.
Hearts don't stress more than men?
any evidence for that?
This again is very personal. You will have more stress if you are a captain of an airplane vs cleaner at an office.
And there is no such thing as perfect, women's bodies are designed to carry babies and are adapted for that. Men's bodies are designed for protecting and providing for their families and are designed for that. There is no shame in saying that men and women are different, there is same in closing your eyes and living in dumb feminist fantasy land where Women can perfectly compete with men in certain areas.
Really? when did you mention equal training? You never said that once until that sentence. Logically speaking, you need to say what you mean and not just expect me to understand by your tone or how you brush your hair.
And really? I have never heard any feminist argue for same standards as men. You people cry and whine about getting the same pay and blah blah blah, but you never complain that to be a cop, or a fireman, or a solider you people have to do 2/3s the requirements of a man. No one likes a hypocrite, so kindly stop being one.
and for the 4.9x10^4th time, please show this evidence.
You know I don't even really care all that much about this topic, but when crazy feminists try to stop opposing opinions by throwing abuse then I feel I need to make my opinions even louder.
( Note to moderator. I did not start it again .
)
