What's new

Indian Army Continues to Use Civilians as Shield Along LOC

Well, you know what they say about love and war.

Let me remind you of the motto of the Keiths, Lords Marischal of Scotland

They say,
What say they?
Let them say.

The Indian Army has stood for a set of values. These have been compromised on occasion, but never by official direction, always - every time - due to the individual weaknesses of soldiers and junior officers concerned. There are less than a score of events that come under that heading.

Please do not smear that record by saying glib things like the phrase you used.
 
. .
Not my problem. Please feel as upset as you wish. I felt sorry for a person who seems to be a Dalit from south India - I could be wrong - and they have had a really horrible time for thousands of years. So I will always try to explain to him rationally what might be wrong with any position that he has taken.

Those posts were meant for nobody else, and, to be perfectly honest, I do not have any reason to offer explanations or justifications to those of you with your minds firmly made up on that particular issue.

Long story short, that was not for you. That sounds terribly rude, but it is the exact truth.
Misdirection.

The enemies of India - and those who think that they were ever anything else - have never missed any opportunity to attack India. Criticism is a weak, diluted euphemism for what emerges.
Illusion.

Some other time. :D
Concealment.


Are you actually David Copperfield?
 
. .
@Joe Shearer

How can you defend your forces when they place gun position in civilian areas?
How can you defend them when they fire at civilian in Pakistani side of Kashmir?
How can you defend shameless / spineless creature who thinks if Pakistan fire Muslims of IOK killed?

This is the height ugliness of Indian forces mentality...

Sit back and don't try to justify cruelty barbarity of the forces of evil...

Honestly, Joe doesn't look like the kind of ex-Military who will justify those crimes. I have known him long enough to conclude that much about him. He's just sticking for his own mates....most soldiers in the IA don't see action in the Operations theatre.

As much painful as the loss of life is, it's ultimately geopolitics which takes precedence over military in Indian government.

An ordinary officer (or an ex-officer who's sometimes drunk) like Joe should not be blamed for the shellings where he had no direct or indirect role.
 
.
@Joe Shearer

How can you defend your forces when they place gun position in civilian areas?
How can you defend them when they fire at civilian in Pakistani side of Kashmir?
How can you defend shameless / spineless creature who thinks if Pakistan fire Muslims of IOK killed?





At the end of the day he is an indian, the eternal forever enemies of the Pakistani people and Pakistan. So of course he will defend them and deny any wrong doing. Like all indians, he also has a blood thirsty hatred of Muslims but unlike the uneducated openly racist ones, he will be more articulate in defending indian atrocities and genocide.
 
. .
An ordinary officer (or an ex-officer who's sometimes drunk) like Joe should not be blamed for the shellings where he had no direct or indirect role.
Then tell him stop justifying and glorifying criminal forces of evil.
 
. .
CEO.

LOL. Actually, for six months, it read
Chief Executive Officer (offg.)​

LOL, you're drunken ex-military as I predicted. In India, many years ago, I have hung out with BSF and IA officers and listened to their tall tales over the cheapest whisky. Was it Director's Special? I can't remember but it sure tasted like turpentine oil.
 
. . .
What @Joe Shearer @Shantanu_Left and probably many other Indians fail to comprehend is quite simply that ever since 1947, the persistent dehumanisation of (in no particular order) Pakistanis, muslims, mughals and Kashmiris by a significant subsection of the Indian population - which was ostensibly intended to psychologically facilitate any number of overt or clandestine struggles against these specific entities for Delhi's perceived gain - has backfired catastrophically.

None of these entities has been silenced or crippled or defeated or removed from the pages of history, and they never can be. Psychological warfare and indoctrination of one's own people to "hate" one's perceived enemies is a methodology that is useful in any war but is emphasised particularly by fascist entities. 20th century history attests to this.

This imprinting on the collective consciousness of the Indian people results in the simplistic and crude "excusing" of or "apologism for" a blatant war crime because the victims of said war crime are perceived as "them", not "us". Even if the definition of Kashmiris is not absolutely "them", they are still "less us" than the Hindu population of Jammu for example.

I'm not saying it's a conscious choice in every case. I can't read minds. However, the net effect is the same whether a conscious choice or a subconscious reflex. Automatic defensiveness of what is quite simply a war crime on Muslims (this "defensiveness" arising because Pakistanis happen to be the accusers) can only be sustained within the collective psyche of Hindustan because of the subconscious dehumanisation of these various entities as described previously.

My conclusion is that once the madness penetrates the subconscious of even well-meaning Indians, the descent of this particular society is complete.
 
.
Mirza, with all my respect for you as a poster (I even thanked the last post for the great points you raised), I will have to debunk some of your beliefs.

What @Joe Shearer @Shantanu_Left and probably many other Indians fail to comprehend is quite simply that ever since 1947, the persistent dehumanisation of (in no particular order) Pakistanis, muslims, mughals and Kashmiris by a significant subsection of the Indian population - which was ostensibly intended to psychologically facilitate any number of overt or clandestine struggles against these specific entities for Delhi's perceived gain - has backfired catastrophically.

I agree with you wholeheartedly that the dehumanization of Pakistanis, Muslims, Mughals, Kashmiris is very much a reality that you experience. But it is not good to combine all of them together. There are different grades and degrees.

Mughals: most modern-day Indians are not sufficiently aware of their own history. Yes, the RSS-Hindutvadis have spray-painted the Mughals negatively. The Congress had nothing to do with that. Generally, it's irrelevant in India except the Babri Masjid demolition was a stark reality of anti-Mughal hate.

(Non-Kashmiri Indian) Muslims: All the liberals on this forum regularly condemn the ruling party of India and the Prime Minister for their involvement in the 2002 Gujarat riots. We also condemned the recent Delhi riots without mincing any words. We also accept that the current ruling dispensation in India is hostile to Indian Muslims.

Kashmiri Muslims: Kashmiri Muslims have certainly been treated the worst in the Secular Republic. And I blame both parties for that: Congress and BJP. But the hatred has really fanned the most during BJP rule. It makes my blood boil every time I read about the atrocities on Kashmiris here and I attribute this to my own part-Kashmir heritage. I am still an Indian.

Also, many Kashmiri Muslims residing in India (but not all) are supporters of the Indian State. They are ordinary people who want no trouble with the law, seek education, jobs, and just live like others.

I am myself torn in this. While I have my sympathies for Yasin Malik and other separatists, a lot of Kashmiris are not backing them enough. In the event of a Referendum (which I fully support), I can tell you the sentiment from the Valley: less than 20 percent Kashmiris will want to separate from India. Most are more than happy with a great degree of autonomy to rule their lives.

Pakistani Muslims: now that's a sensitive topic. As we have discussed countless times here before, Indian media is to be blamed for the dehumanization of Pakistani Muslims in India. And none of us liberals support the Indian mainstream media, that's why we are on a Pakistani forum because we get better quality news of our own country.

Aman ki Asha was a good initiative to prevent this kind of dehumanization of Pakistani Muslims in India. But of course, it's in cold basket now. Let us open a new thread to discuss how Pakistani Muslims should be portrayed in Indian media, and what Indian liberals can do better to prevent any possible dehumanization.

Neither me or Joe (or any other Indian posters) would support any of this. And you know that.

None of these entities has been silenced or crippled or defeated or removed from the pages of history, and they never can be. Psychological warfare and indoctrination of one's own people to "hate" one's perceived enemies is a methodology that is useful in any war but is emphasised particularly by fascist entities. 20th century history attests to this.

We don't support the fascists of Narendra Modi, Amit Shah, and their entire team. But we do support our country because we love it just like you love yours. If you can't see the difference between the two positions, then there is nothing left to argue.

This imprinting on the collective consciousness of the Indian people results in the simplistic and crude "excusing" of or "apologism for" a blatant war crime because the victims of said war crime are perceived as "them", not "us". Even if the definition of Kashmiris is not absolutely "them", they are still "less us" than the Hindu population of Jammu for example.

As mentioned here, we are ourselves against this "us" versus "them" generalization. But it's not going away anytime soon. We will do what is needed to prevent it in the future. So open a new relevant thread and we can discuss ideas.

I'm not saying it's a conscious choice in every case. I can't read minds. However, the net effect is the same whether a conscious choice or a subconscious reflex. Automatic defensiveness of what is quite simply a war crime on Muslims (this "defensiveness" arising because Pakistanis happen to be the accusers) can only be sustained within the collective psyche of Hindustan because of the subconscious dehumanisation of these various entities as described previously.

My conclusion is that once the madness penetrates the subconscious of even well-meaning Indians, the descent of this particular society is complete.

Please see above. Totally against any sort of dehumanization of any group, including Pakistani Muslims. Our objective in this forum is to win hearts, and clear misunderstandings.

Peace
@Joe Shearer @xeuss
 
.
Can't be that clever though. After all, you figured me out.

Please, this is not a happy conversation.

You need to understand that I hate bigotry and Islamophobia, and I hate the ideology and the violence and oppression of the current ruling party in India.

That does not mean that I have stopped being an Indian. When this abomination has passed, when we are normal again, whatever India stood for, and should stand for, is something that is embedded in me. I have done my bit for my country, unlike some two-bit scoundrels who use their anonymity to flaunt their worst prejudices and to irritate and annoy you and Pakistanis on this forum: in fact, everywhere on the Internet.

Thinking that what I say is based on today's loyalties and party partisan feeling is wholly mistaken. You are entitled to your views. It is just that they are not mine, and shall never be mine. Let it rest at that.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom