AK-47
BANNED
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2009
- Messages
- 139
- Reaction score
- 0
For starters, instead of blaming & creating anti-Pakistan hysteria from the get-go your politicians should have waited to conduct an in-house investigation. Then they should have 'requested' Pakistan instead of 'threatening' it to take action.
I agree with part somewhat but India did "requested" those terrorist organizations to banned and hand over wanted criminals. Nothing happedned.
If this incident could have been used to build stronger bridge of trust & cooperation between India and Pakistan instead of out rightly blaming Pakistan, it would have been a different scenario by now.
Agree with this part, GOI should of handled the situation differently.
Remember, it was NOT Pakistan Army soldiers who invaded Mumbai or Al-Khalid Tanks rolled down like Iraqi's did in Kuwait! At the end of the day what happened in Mumbai is no more than a heinous crime by bunch of misguided criminals. If one of those criminals is proved to be from Pakistan then there are diplomatic and legal ways to conduct an investigation of this crime.
GOP didn't even recognized that terrorists were Pakistanies. Ajmal's father and his village was shown on TV but GOP banned all repoters to that village and denied he was even Pakistani. I dont think you can build trust like that. You have said the India should of have used different approach but same thing could be said for Pakistan too. GOP knew they were Pakistanies and they should of came out clean addmited that.
For us Pakistani's the Indian 'holier-than-thou' attitude is not acceptable in a situation where this unfortunate incident is turned into a Pakistan-bashing excercise by your politicians and largely ignorant media!
Rememer India has only said that All options are on the table and terrorists came from Pakistan. Rest of the stuff was created by media on both side. "Surgcal strike" stuff was created by Indian media and stating that terrorists were SIKHS or hardline HINDUS was done by Pakistani media and self proclaimed DEFENCE ANALYSIST Zaid Hamid.
I agree with part somewhat but India did "requested" those terrorist organizations to banned and hand over wanted criminals. Nothing happedned.
If this incident could have been used to build stronger bridge of trust & cooperation between India and Pakistan instead of out rightly blaming Pakistan, it would have been a different scenario by now.
Agree with this part, GOI should of handled the situation differently.
Remember, it was NOT Pakistan Army soldiers who invaded Mumbai or Al-Khalid Tanks rolled down like Iraqi's did in Kuwait! At the end of the day what happened in Mumbai is no more than a heinous crime by bunch of misguided criminals. If one of those criminals is proved to be from Pakistan then there are diplomatic and legal ways to conduct an investigation of this crime.
GOP didn't even recognized that terrorists were Pakistanies. Ajmal's father and his village was shown on TV but GOP banned all repoters to that village and denied he was even Pakistani. I dont think you can build trust like that. You have said the India should of have used different approach but same thing could be said for Pakistan too. GOP knew they were Pakistanies and they should of came out clean addmited that.
For us Pakistani's the Indian 'holier-than-thou' attitude is not acceptable in a situation where this unfortunate incident is turned into a Pakistan-bashing excercise by your politicians and largely ignorant media!
Rememer India has only said that All options are on the table and terrorists came from Pakistan. Rest of the stuff was created by media on both side. "Surgcal strike" stuff was created by Indian media and stating that terrorists were SIKHS or hardline HINDUS was done by Pakistani media and self proclaimed DEFENCE ANALYSIST Zaid Hamid.