What's new

Indian aggression at LOC

Pakistan need to tone down the military freehand. I doubt civil govt will know exactly what happened on boarder.(de javu Kargil)
 
pakistan really left quite way back in arm race due to the economic and political unstability. The budget is 3 bn is 10 time less then India,

Also India got Modi at pivotal point and Pak is revising old wine in new 2014.

Pakistan should tone down the secruity paradigm , find new world order and align herself. Pakistan is important country and intrest are the only permanent friend.
 
Modi is right Bahadur Shah Zafar se kyoun baat Karen.
 
BTW Indo-China border is guarded by ITBP..only Bangladesh and Pakistani borders fall under BSF.
That still means that the force is divided between two fronts.
On the ground advantage can be seen from the fact..as per Indian new agencies..firing from Indian sides is much heavier..as per them intelligence reports convey a large number of Pakistani post have been destroyed or partially damaged(80 -90).
The Indian media, fed by propaganda from the Modi government machinery, will obviously claim that "the Indian response is heavier, blah, blah, blah ..". Modi ran for election on the basis of being "stronger on national security than Congress", so at the very least the rhetoric and claims during this incident are going to be exaggerated to accommodate Modi's "56 inch chest".
And obviously casualties on Pakistani side are higher..even Pakistani media is claiming 20 Pakistani casualties..since these violations began
The casualty numbers being provided by both sides are civilian - these are people living in, at times, mud houses instead of concrete bunkers. Basking in glory over how more civilians have been killed on the Pakistani side is a pretty shameful exercise.
 
pakistan really left quite way back in arm race due to the economic and political unstability. The budget is 3 bn is 10 time less then India,

Also India got Modi at pivotal point and Pak is revising old wine in new 2014.

Pakistan should tone down the secruity paradigm , find new world order and align herself. Pakistan is important country and intrest are the only permanent friend.

a sheep every indian thinks is a wolf....what has he accomplished so far vis-a-vis Kashmir?

as time goes on, indians will learn to be highly dis-appointed that their god Modi is capable of nothing as far as Kashmir is concerned...the tides will never change
 
dont annoy Pakistan or make ridiculous statements like bring up 1971 (which wasnt even a full-scale war fought on the ground by indians)

realities changed in 1998 for the region......india has neither the capability or the strength to dominate or subjugate Pakistan. It just wont happen. We are too much a proud people, and would set aside any differences when it comes to dealing with india

Unfortunately that is the greatest tragedy of your country and nation. You need India and Islam to be united and probably to justify your existence as a nation even. It is not a good situation after so many years of independence.

India does not need Pakistan or Hinduism to be united. As Indians we have an advantage surely that we have developed a habit since last 4000 years to consider ourselves as one nation irrespective of diversity in language , religion etc. . Pakistan does not have this benefit as the concept of Pakistan is only 70 years old.

But this is not the only reason for India to be united to a great extent (not claiming 100%). We are united inspite of so much diversity/differences because we understand this is the only way to develop ourselves economically, to establish rule of law and even to exist. Our working unity is based on historical reason and economical reason. That's why the concept of our nation is relatively more (not 100% again) stable than Pakistan which requires external stimulus to be united. Pakistan must find internal reasons to be united as a nation and also to develop themselves as a true nation. There are substantial scope to improve for India too.

This is my personal thought only. This is not any claim or verdict anyway
 
Every 2 years or so your army runs an operation with a fancy urdu name and declares victory, and the bomb blasts start from the very next day
The inability to "hold" is not the fault of the Army - the burden for that falls on the civilian government and civilian institutions, which have failed miserably to constitute feasible policies to "hold" areas cleared by the Army, let alone effectively implement them. Trying to understand the finer points of a complex issue like COIN before shooting your mouth off would do you, and the general tone of discourse on this forum, a world of good.
 
where's your proof of that? and dont even talk about firing on civilians....we know you dot-heads are expert at that. Kashmiris will attest to that
Check the deceased and injured list of our side. You will come to know the hypocrisy
 
On the ground advantage can be seen from the fact..as per Indian new agencies..firing from Indian sides is much heavier..as per them intelligence reports convey a large number of Pakistani post have been destroyed or partially damaged(80 -90).

India media is jingoistic and victim of war hysteria just like you and your whole nation. So please stop quoting it as a source. It is simply not reliable and completely bogus.

And obviously casualties on Pakistani side are higher..even Pakistani media is claiming 20 Pakistani casualties..since these violations began

At most we had 13 casualties. All civilians. It is obvious that you Indians are getting too excited with the death of the civilians but still no need to exaggerate to feed your jingoism and sadistic nature.
 

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom