Arsalan mehmud
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2015
- Messages
- 889
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Agar samajh aata to UN Security council ka permanent member kab ka ban jata...Sorry, I dont understand
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Agar samajh aata to UN Security council ka permanent member kab ka ban jata...Sorry, I dont understand
See who is talking...Elections have no value in Pakistan.
Savage. But, please stick to the topic.According to Durex, Indians are not very well endowed. You will fall into that category. Statistically.
Savage. But, please stick to the topic.
Another prediction come from India, their wish of become the UN permanent member will never come true. Keep on waiting India someday UN will be dissolved and India will finally be the only member in the UN.
she should shut her mouth and keep quiet on matters where she does not have expertise. UN is a dummy organization created by selfish powers. Becoming strong should be our goal we can do whatever we want. This is how international politics run by powerful ones ,become one not hanker for one.France supported the extension while Russia and China did not make any submission on the issue, Swaraj said.
By: PTI | New Delhi | Updated: April 6, 2017 6:43 pm
“I am confident that if not this time, then next time, India would become a permanent member of the Security Council,” Sushma Swaraj said. (Representational Image)
Expressing confidence that India would become a permanent member of the UN Security Council, External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj on Thursday said the country expected that the new members would have the same rights, including the veto power, as the existing permanent members.
During the Question Hour in Rajya Sabha, Swaraj said India has all the credentials to become a permanent member of the Security Council and four permanent members, US, UK, France and Russia have extended support.
The fifth member, China, has also “not publicly opposed it”, the External Affairs minister said.
“I am confident that if not this time, then next time, India would become a permanent member of the Security Council,” she said.
To a question whether India would also get the ‘veto’ power, Swaraj said the country wants the same esponsibilities, prerogatives as well as obligations as the current permanent members.
“We don’t want any discrimination between old and new members. We don’t want two classes – that there is a first class and a second class of permanent members. This should make it clear that India wants the same responsibilities, prerogatives and obligations as the current permanent members,” she said.
She said India has been making diplomatic efforts to ensure not only expansion but also reform in the Security Council. She said India wanted expansion of its permanent as well as non-permanent membership of the council.
In her reply tabled in the House, Swaraj said on the issue of extending veto powers to new permanent members in their submission during the inter-governmental negotiation process of the 69th General Assembly, USA and UK opposed extension of veto to new members.
France supported the extension while Russia and China did not make any submission on the issue, she said.
She said discussions were currently on in the UN General Assembly through inter-governmental negotiation and India and other pro-reform groupings have been calling commencement of text based negotiations.
US CHINA Founding father never took any dispute to UN or made a false promise in UN.. that bluffing culture only belongs to India...
In all honesty, India shoud have a seat on the council based on it representing a significant portion of the world's population and soon global GDP. but is currently not mature enough to be qualified for one.
but is currently not mature enough to be qualified for one.
There was only one requirement to become a UNSC P5 member... to have been a major independent power on the Allied side of WW2 in 1945.
That's all.
India did not exist in 1945, so they did not qualify. And Britain already had a P5 seat.