India to use Tu-22M3 Supersonic Bombers to Hunt down PLAN Warships

[Kinetic]

How much those birds are upgraded? 4 birds are not sufficient number against PLAN because they will send CBG to patrol Indian Ocean in future and they already have capabilities to take out air threats up to 200kms from ships.

PLAN CBG will not able to enter Indian ocean region thanks to Heavily guarded Andamand by Brahmos with Sukhoi.

 

[Eminent Mainstream Media]

I didn't invent the story, the fact that India is geographically venerable vis-à-vis China thank to Tibet. Without Tibet China will be very venerable facing India because 80% of our cargo pass through Indian Ocean and we can do nothing...simple logic

Why do you think It is India who is vulnerable- I see It the other way- Given China has to maintain It forces at Tibet with such a stretched logistics I see China who is more vulnerable specially in Tibet- Given Its a sparsely populated and lacks resources to sustain an Army- Perhaps a reason why It is one of the most peaceful frontier in spite of the weaker Indian position in terms to strength and last mile connectivity-

 

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

So you are assuming PLAN to something which It hasn't done ever- and do It repeatedly 200 times- And why did you add Indian Navy here I asked over all- are you assuming that PLAN can only sink ships of Indian Navy and cannot ever damage any other Navy at all- It would be another disastrous assumption given Indian Navy would be least of your worries as of now-

I don't get what you're trying to say.

PLAN CBG will not able to enter Indian ocean region thanks to Heavily guarded Andamand by Brahmos with Sukhoi.

We don't came without any multi-layer coverage, most likely these two islands will be conquered and occupied at the fst hours of battle. and will serve as platform for China deal with the rest of Indian Navy.

 

[Eminent Mainstream Media]

I don't get what you're trying to say.

Oh sorry I don't know much mandarin- Try the translator-

 

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

Why do you think It is India who is vulnerable- I see It the other way- Given China has to maintain It forces at Tibet with such a stretched logistics I see China who is more vulnerable specially in Tibet- Given Its a sparsely populated and lacks resources to sustain an Army- Perhaps a reason why It is one of the most peaceful frontier in spite of the weaker Indian position in terms to strength and last mile connectivity-

Not anymore venerable as 1962, with the train and Y-20 strategic transport, we can reinforce a matter of hours to get what we need to deal with India. But all your military command and control and high value military target are within our striking range.

 

[Basel]

PLAN CBG will not able to enter Indian ocean region thanks to Heavily guarded Andamand by Brahmos with Sukhoi.

Even now they can take out mighty MKIs and super bramos in their respective hangers and launchers from very far and very accurately at Andamand if required. The habit of Indians thinking of themselves as superior then others will cost them big one day.

 

[Eminent Mainstream Media]

Not anymore venerable as 1962, with the train and Y-20 strategic transport, we can reinforce a matter of hours to get what we need to deal with India. But all your military command and control and high value military target are within our striking range.

That train has a long route- longer the route more vulnerable is logistics- Y-20 too is a massive aircraft an easy target- I hope you realize that India maintain an Air Force-

Not all C&C are within your range- also your planes would have to fly higher 8000-10000 meters to pass the Himalayas helping in early detection in case PLAAF decide to take on our C&C in vicinity- add to that the ordinance carrying capability will reduce somewhat due to less air around Tibetan air fields-

Even now they can take out mighty MKIs and super bramos in their respective hangers and launchers from very far and very accurately at Andamand if required. The habit of Indians thinking of themselves as superior then others will cost them big one day.

And would they do that unless they are using ballistic missiles- Which will be considered as Nuclear first strike-

 

[Basel]

That train has a long route- longer the route more vulnerable is logistics- Y-20 too is a massive aircraft an easy target- I hope you realize that India maintain an Air Force-

Not all C&C are within your range- also your planes would have to fly higher 8000-10000 meters to pass the Himalayas helping in early detection in case PLAAF decide to take on our C&C in vicinity- add to that the ordinance carrying capability will reduce somewhat due to less air around Tibetan air fields-



And would they do that unless they are using ballistic missiles- Which will be considered as Nuclear first strike-

China also have long range CMs too, which they can launch from land, sea and air. China can use many type of weapon systems to get the job done but reality is that India and China will not fight a direct war in future.

 

[UKBengali]

Yes, helicopters are also aircraft.I am yet to know about a helicopter that performs combat air patrols, or strike mission, or escorts attack squadrons....

Before you make a cake of yourself, get a grip.

Oh lord you Indians are seriously lacking in mental
capacity.

When did I ever state that a helicopter performs
what you just said?

All I said was that two Chinese carriers may carry 120 aircraft in total.

The quality of this forum must be going low if someone like you can become a "Professional"
and be "thanked" from a "Think Thank Analyst" who
happens to be Indian lol.

 

[Eminent Mainstream Media]

China also have long range CMs too, which they can launch from land, sea and air. China can use many type of weapon systems to get the job done but reality is that India and China will not fight a direct war in future.

As far as Cruise missiles are concerned we have adequate strength in the form of IAF to intercept them-

Now since you know the reality- you should give your argument a rest-

All I said was that two Chinese carriers may carry 120 aircraft in total.

Where are the two Chinese carriers- Please talk about something which exists- we may have bigger trouble in the form of Intergalactic destroyers Bangladesh might make in future But until then Its non-existent-

 

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

That train has a long route- longer the route more vulnerable is logistics- Y-20 too is a massive aircraft an easy target- I hope you realize that India maintain an Air Force-

Not all C&C are within your range- also your planes would have to fly higher 8000-10000 meters to pass the Himalayas helping in early detection in case PLAAF decide to take on our C&C in vicinity- add to that the ordinance carrying capability will reduce somewhat due to less air around Tibetan air fields-

And would they do that unless they are using ballistic missiles- Which will be considered as Nuclear first strike-

If our train is venerable, what about Indian logistic, you think it will be safe from PLAAF? Y-20 is easy target only if you assume that Indian Air force will dominate Tibet sky?

We don't need to destroy your C&C at the other side of the coast such Mumbai, but what ever 350km range from our border will be vulnerable to our long range rockets that include New Delhi, unless you want to move all these high value government building and military facility far away of our rocket range

 

[Eminent Mainstream Media]

If our train is venerable, what about Indian logistic, you think it will be safe from PLAAF? Y-20 is easy target only if you assume that Indian Air force will dominate Tibet sky?

India has Its population centers and crop producing states Just a few hundred Km away from the frontier- Also the motivation for Indian population living near Himalayas would be much higher than the Chinese soldier who is fighting 1000s of Km away from home- Add to that any casualty of Chinese would mean the only child of the family lost-

No IAF is not in a position to dominate Tibet sky- But It sure can make incursions and hit and run attacks on Y-20 fleet in the long stretched logistics like- and BVRAAM makes It some what easier-

We don't need to destroy your C&C at the other side of the coast such Mumbai, but what ever 350km range from our border will be vulnerable to our long range rockets that include New Delhi, unless you want to move all these high value government building and military facility far away of our rocket range

What long range rocket you are talking about- and 350km from Delhi is Himalayan peaks- How are you planning to put your rocket launchers on those peaks- Without India doing anything about It-

 

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

India has Its population centers and crop producing states Just a few hundred Km away from the frontier- Also the motivation for Indian population living near Himalayas would be much higher than the Chinese soldier who is fighting 1000s of Km away from home- Add to that any casualty of Chinese would mean the only child of the family lost-

No IAF is not in a position to dominate Tibet sky- But It sure can make incursions and hit and run attacks on Y-20 fleet in the long stretched logistics like- and BVRAAM makes It some what easier-

What long range rocket you are talking about- and 350km from Delhi is Himalayan peaks- How are you planning to put your rocket launchers on those peaks- Without India doing anything about It-

You got the outdate date, yes in 1960s Chinese population were not much in Tibet but due to economy development, we have a lot of population there now and it will even worst for India that your population live near Himalayas, do you think of the casualty of Indians? we might lost only child of the family but you gonna lose multi-children of the family.

And if you think you can use such hit and run tactic and we can't play this game, it will be even worst for India if we hit your precious C-17 or C-130.

We put our 350 km rocket on our side of border as you Indian place your tank and airplane on your side, you can come to find and neutralized it if you're capable, this is call the defense and offensive game.

 

[nang2]

now this section is more like a Chinese defense forum.

 

[Eminent Mainstream Media]

You got the outdate date, yes in 1960s Chinese population were not much in Tibet but due to economy development, we have a lot of population there now and it will even worst for India that your population live near Himalayas, do you think of the casualty of Indians? we might lost only child of the family but you gonna lose multi-children of the family.

How do you plan to grow enough food for your forces in Tibet and Even today Tibet is sparsely populated area- they have seen increase in Chinese Tourists but that is only upto certain cities- compared to that Indian tourists regularly visits Pangong lake- Also keep in mind the soft support every Tibetan has for Dalai lama-

It is not like that- usually one Child in in Army and one is farming other is doing something else and so on- so If one Child dies the family can still survive- In case of China- one child dies and It is all over- so the cost on every Chinese soldier is much much higher-

And if you think you can use such hit and run tactic and we can't play this game, it will be even worst for India if we hit your precious C-17 or C-130.

We put our 350 km rocket on our side of border as you Indian place your tank and airplane on your side, you can come to find and neutralized it if you're capable, this is call the defense and offensive game.

Off course you can play the game too- That is why strategic air lifers are vulnerable lot both for China and India- Just that you will get less chance because they will because they will be flying lesser than their Chinese counterparts-

You can do that But that would keep It out of range from Delhi and other major population centers- the Himalayas in the middle extend even inside Tibet and the terrain makes It impossible to bring your TELs within range- you can trace the strategic Chinese road as possible deployment area for your TELs-