aditiwari007
FULL MEMBER
New Recruit
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2009
- Messages
- 27
- Reaction score
- 0
I thimk you should search the web or encyclopedias like Wkipedia or Britanica for the real truth as I had already in another post, that pakistani text books have put you in many illusions like winning 1965 war against India.In haste you forgot to read properly. Sentense is "comparatively more stronger". Have some tea and say good morning to yourself.
Regarding Kashmir, More than Pakistan, its the Kashmiries who believe they dont belong to India. Pakistan should fight Saudia and China because they are Muslim countries? Well these are other nations but what a pitty that India has to fight its own Nationals in order to convince itself that Kashmir belongs to it.
If it belongs to you, you never had taken it into United Nations. India has never been able to produce evidence that ruler of Kashmir signed agreement with India. So get out of your dreamworld and see how things are on the ground.
When pakistan tried to inavde Kashmir, Mahraja Hari Singh of Kashmir, who was not certain earlier that who will take care of his state properly, immediately signed with India. The Indian forces had almost taken over Kashmir but still peaceloving Nehru went to UN, despite Sardar Patel's opposition, as he was friends with many pakistani leaders earlier inculding Jinnah.
And yes, who said that Kashmiris are not happy with India. Some pakistanis have brainwashed some Kashmiris and use the videos made on this matter for propoganda. Why is that leaders like Farooq Abdullah or Omar Abdullah are elected with tremendous majority if Kashmiris are not happy. And yes, pakistanis were also not happy with Mussharraf's rule as he was allowing US to be the master of Pak. So, should we have claimed pakistan.