Abingdonboy
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2010
- Messages
- 29,597
- Reaction score
- 46
- Country
- Location
What Indian companies, before 2006 provided components to the F-16, Rafale, F-18, Gripen, EFT, MiG-35? This is an absurd point, the MMRCA deal will be coming with ToT and local production that WILL involve numerous Indian companies both public and pvt on the private side these will include Samtal, Reliance, TATA etc- Barred any private firm from even component level participation from MMRCA
- Chose the CH-47 instead of Mi-26T which is highly improved and completely digital.
- Chose AH-64 instead of Mi-28N.
Since when did Russian products become Indian? Just because you have a preference for Russian products (for god knows what reasons considering how they have consistently screwed India on supply, costs and after sale support). The Ch-47F and AH-64E won their respective competitions on MERIT. To claim political considerations played a part is nothing but slander.
It takes time for the IA to get the requisite infrastructure down for operating and maintaining a 60++ ton heavy MBT of Western design ideology when it has operated medium weight MBTs of Russian origin for decades. It's not going to happen overnight. It is now getting used to the Arjun and will be placing more orders..- DRDO fought uphill battle to induct more Arjuns despite their proven worth in the Arjun vs T-90 showdown.
Where is the NAG MANPADs variant? Has it even been tested? Nope, it is nowhere to be seen, the Indian Mil can't be sat around waiting for the DRDO to deliver on their promises that they have a poor record of doing.- Chose to import ATGMs rather than speeding up Nag and developing its MANPAD variant.
What IFVs has India imported in the last 2 decades?- Chose to import IFVs instead of going at it alone despite potential and capabilities.
Clearly you don't know what you're talking about- the Hawk is an ADVANCED Jet Trainer, the HJT-36 is an IJT, whilst the Hawk can do all the training the IJT can do the HJT-36 cannot do all the training an AJT can- they are different beasts.- Chose the Hawks rather than speeding up IJT-36.
And you seem to think by will alone these projects can be "sped up" it doesn't work like that, the IAF is still waiting for the LCA and if it waited any longer for the HTT-40 it wouldn't have a pilot cadre who knew how to fly a basic prop trainer!
The IA requires 3 different types of arty- MGS, towed, ULH all of 155mm calibre. The ToT of the FH77 is of little aid in meeting these requirements.- Sat and ruined Bofors technology for 25 years despite sitting on full ToT by Sweden. Now planning to import again.
Indeed that would be good, maybe TATA can come up with something? But tbh the Indian automotive industry is lacking on the engine design and production front especially on the HGV side of things. These US MRAPs will be powered by massive engines and to date I don't know what "desi" company could offer a suitable replacement.It would be nice if we could replace the engine of these MRAPs with our desi engines after a few years n extend their life n reduce maintenance cost.