Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
but i don't think that was the correct composition shown for typhoon thats why i doing it and gain why it has lower rcs and good stol capability@ Bagee
Check my post, because I already showed in comparison for both fighters, or put it in a single post, because so many posts makes it confusing.
http://www.defence.pk/forums/india-...ef-rafale-mmrca-shortlist-94.html#post1744834
Sancho I am calling you out Troll..
Rafale also has a sawtooth design feature all over the airframe and even in the air intakes.
http://i32.servimg.com/u/f32/11/28/97/15/drk_9612.jpg
http://i32.servimg.com/u/f32/11/28/97/15/drk_9611.jpg
All stealth fighters begining with the F117 used similar sawtooth design features with the same aim of scattering the radar waves and to reduce the RCS as well:
Both uses high ammounts of composite and RAM materials, also use similar RCS reduction features. Which makes clear that both should have very low RCS, but I don't want to speculate which one is lower.
Actually you are the troll.
You are comparing a 4th gen fighter to a fifth gen one.
Look at the size of Su-30.. Su-30 Rcs would be 60% more than Rafale
Rafale is small compared to Su-30 and will have very less RCS when compared to SU-30
But Su-30 can carry more weapon load and highy manevourable
Am not good at aircraft scienceYou are looking fighters at clean configuration... In war scenario it is not the case dude.... you need to count RCS with external loading... so what you can say?? Rafale or EFT will not have 5 m2 alteast???... it is enough for MKI to detect at 150-200 KM of distance away...
all 4.75 gen doesnt make sense unless it is a VLO.... others are not game changers... w.r.t MKI
I am assuming what ever fighter we pick, it will certainly help to shape teja mk2 fighter jet, using they technology ...
Am not good at aircraft science
can u tell me wat is VLO??