India Rejects Pakistan Peace Plan

[Knight Rider]

G8, so you can judge that what harm your enemy can take to harm you and what he can't.... well buddy you are prepared for the best case scenario, But in the war room strategies are made with worst case scenario.

With reference to history - 1965 and 1999 when the response was surprising and unexpected.

Japanese Forces surrendered to US after getting nuked in two cities in Second World War. German Forces did after losing Berlin. Crusader forces (Israel) Surrendered to Salahudin Bin Ayyubi (The Great Syrian General) in Battle of Hattin IN 1187. Keeping your Enemy under pressure is a vital Strategy that how your enemy makes mistakes.

 

[BABA AGHORI]

Japanese Forces surrendered to US after getting nuked in two cities in Second World War. German Forces did after losing Berlin. Crusader forces (Israel) Surrendered to Salahudin Bin Ayyubi (The Great Syrian General) in Battle of Hattin IN 1187. Keeping your Enemy under pressure is a vital Strategy that how your enemy makes mistakes.

Are you referring the same pressure like 1971 fall of DHAKA ?

US has technological advantage as Japan was not having Nukes.
Germany lost not because of fall of Berlin alone. It was because he opened too many fronts at once, specially Russia.
Israel has a different history of taking whole Arab world at once, not what is taught in text books.

Enemy under pressure is a good POV, but thinking of doing it with just hoax, only makes your enemy more comfortable.

 

[GR!FF!N]

As Indian members are stating for quite long time,we don't have any desire to engage Pakistan till they take hard stance over Anti Indian Terrorist Groups.They can shove all their "Points" in their glorious @***.we're not interested.First,take action against terrorism,then we'll talk.till then,buzz off..

and please,don't act like a "Chipku".its getting boring now.

Crusader forces (Israel)

I salute your extent of knowledge.

 

[SMC]

This makes no sense. Bharat, a terrorism sponsoring state, sponsoring terrorism since its inception is calling others on terrorism. Those in glass houses shouldn't throw stones..

 

[lastofthepatriots]

India as an uncivilized nation understands only one language. And that is violence. They choose not live in peace, and If they want to live in violence then who is better than Pakistan to teach them.

 

[Knight Rider]

I salute your extent of knowledge.

When i referred the Crusader Armies with Israel i meant the city of Jerusalem. Jerusalem is a city of Palestine captured by Israel. Jerusalem was captured by Templar or Crusader forces in the First Crusade. and Salahudin Bin Ayyubi kicked the crusader armies out of Jerusalem in the Third Crusade.

Jerusalem,Palestine

The Templar consists of Knight Templar and Knight Hospitaller. Biggest Enemies of Saladin Armies.

 

[zebra7]

When i referred the Crusader Armies with Israel i meant the city of Jerusalem. Jerusalem is a city of Palestine captured by Israel. Jerusalem was captured by Templar or Crusader forces in the First Crusade. and Salahudin Bin Ayyubi kicked the crusader armies out of Jerusalem in the Third Crusade.

Jerusalem,Palestine

The Templar consists of Knight Templar and Knight Hospitaller. Biggest Enemies of Saladin Armies.

Jerusalem is equally important for Jews, muslims and Christians. How can you claim it for the muslim alone.

 

[GR!FF!N]

When i referred the Crusader Armies with Israel i meant the city of Jerusalem. Jerusalem is a city of Palestine captured by Israel. Jerusalem was captured by Templar or Crusader forces in the First Crusade. and Salahudin Bin Ayyubi kicked the crusader armies out of Jerusalem in the Third Crusade.

Jerusalem,Palestine

The Templar consists of Knight Templar and Knight Hospitaller. Biggest Enemies of Saladin Armies.

Technically,Jerusalem is a city which is nobody's city and everybody's city.Jerusalem was sacked for several times,many times it was beseiged,captured and recaptured.and this city doesn't belong to "Muslims",This city came to existence long before Islam itself,and Biblical references state this city was made over "City of David",the Jew City.whatever it might be,Cristian Crusaders(And they were Europeans,mainly French) captured it and occupied it for nearly a 100 years,then Muslims conquered it.Then during sixth crusades,Crusaders controlled it.then came tartars,mamluks and at last Ottoman Turks.so,it is a city who has many claimers.After War of 1948,Jordan annexed this city.It is them who expelled the Jew settlers there and gave refuge to Palestanians.So claiming it "Palestanian City" would be unjust.

 

[WAJsal]

I think the lady is right.

The excuse was absolutely hilarious. India has been supporting anti-Pakistan elements way before '71. India is to this date doing whatever it can to destroy Pakistan, unfortunately some people in your state can't swallow the fact, which is Pakistan. You finance terrorism in Pakistan and cry that we are the one's doing so. We should have given a direct response to such a ridiculous excuse.
Pakistan should swallow the hard pill, let's face it: India is scared of the word Kashmir, it will never want to solve it and you might even get to hear some more ridiculous excuses.
@haviZsultan , your thoughts?

 

[@nline]

What else you can accept by Secular India

 

[third eye]

Pakistan should swallow the hard pill, let's face it: India is scared of the word Kashmir, it will never want to solve it and you might even get to hear some more ridiculous excuses.

Yes, Pakistan needs to swallow the hard ( & bitter pill).

Kashmir will never be a part of Pakistan , India does not see the need to ' solve' anything at all.

 

[sms]

The excuse was absolutely hilarious. India has been supporting anti-Pakistan elements way before '71. India is to this date doing whatever it can to destroy Pakistan, unfortunately some people in your state can't swallow the fact, which is Pakistan. You finance terrorism in Pakistan and cry that we are the one's doing so. We should have given a direct response to such a ridiculous excuse.
Pakistan should swallow the hard pill, let's face it: India is scared of the word Kashmir, it will never want to solve it and you might even get to hear some more ridiculous excuses.
@haviZsultan , your thoughts?

Yes, Pakistan needs to swallow the hard ( & bitter pill).

Kashmir will never be a part of Pakistan , India does not see the need to ' solve' anything at all.

Winds have changed!
Now onwards it's the Pakistan who has to defend Kashmir occupation, not not other way around!

 

[Rocky25]

Pakistan has battlefield nukes if India try to do a mass attack with their ground forces Pakistan will deploy Battlefield Nukes neutralizing Indian Ground Forces useless.

Confirmed: Pakistan Is Building 'Battlefield Nukes' to Deter India0

Good for you! But what make you think that we cannot work on counter measures? It is quite possible to clean up our area of operation before we set foot on your land.....

India have both the quantity and quality vis-a-vis Pakistan... Do you know what is the official Indian doctrine? So what plans if India retaliate massively to the puny Nasr?

What if India opens up hostilities in a densely populated Pakistani city, Do you still use 'Battle Field' Nukes there?

Have you forgot about Uncle Sam?

 

[WAJsal]

Winds have changed!
Now onwards it's the Pakistan who has to defend Kashmir occupation, not not other way around!

That's good to hear. Are you a part of minority in India, that isn't scared of a referendum? That's good to hear.

Yes, Pakistan needs to swallow the hard ( & bitter pill).

Kashmir will never be a part of Pakistan , India does not see the need to ' solve' anything at all.

How could you, India can't take it's chances in a referendum, knowing the obvious results. Let's face the reality India is scared of following the resolution, since it is Pakistan India will never give up it's side, forceful occupation will continue.

 

[third eye]

How could you, India can't take it's chances in a referendum, knowing the obvious results. Let's face the reality India is scared of following the resolution, since it is Pakistan India will never give up it's side, forceful occupation will continue.

Referendum ceased to be an option the day Chinese stepped into Aksai Chin & Pakistan ceded parts of the ' disputed territory ' to China.

The reality varies depending on which side of the Radcliffe line you are on.

Those on the East of line are happy to read your acceptance that India will never ever give up on a part of its own nation.