What's new

India readying weapon to destroy enemy satellites

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ohh maddy, Did he mentioned about the 'time frame' its gotta to be 20-25 years

plz go read the newest article of reorganizing the DRDO..

The DRDO has its share of success and failures.. trying to look at only its failures would be wrong.... again....Assuming something does not make it a good debate..
 
See, am i right, you guys were pissed when we keep critisize about

Indians poverty, toilets crisis, global index etc.

But you were enjoying critisize about Chinese communist,

democracy, copying etc. over and over again.

Typical Indians style double standard logic :smitten::pakistan::china:

Personally I believe any kind of government that allows its citizens to prosper and allow them the freedom and right to enjoy that prosperity is good. If that communism for China, so be it. Who are we to critisize. Lets focus on our issue and spend energy there.. At the end of the day what matters is the quality of governance and sustainability of prosperity. World has a nice way to attain equilibrium if the policies become too citizen unfriendly.. We have all seen the examples in USSR, East Germany, to some extent in Pakistan against dictatorship and even India way back in 70s when Mrs Gandhi became too autocratic. There is no single right answer.. what ever works is good.
 
in⋅cred⋅i⋅ble  /ɪnˈkrɛdəbəl/
–adjective 1. so extraordinary as to seem impossible: incredible speed.
2. not credible; hard to believe; unbelievable: The plot of the book is incredible.

;)


On a serious note, the Indians have smart scientists and a decent enough infrastructure, so it would be wrong to underestimate them. Sure they have had failures, but that's part of the game.

At the same time, Indian media has an extremely puerile style of 'reporting' which makes it tempting to burst the bubble of hype.

They are only saying that it is in development phase not developed its not hype being created so chill..
We will develop new techs rather sooner than later
 
plz go read the newest article of reorganizing the DRDO..

The DRDO has its share of success and failures.. trying to look at only its failures would be wrong.... again....Assuming something does not make it a good debate..

Could not find it, post it please...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Last edited by a moderator:
Last edited by a moderator:
Those 100,000 tons of Human Excrement is being used as manure for veg like Potato,Onions, Spinach and is being exported, People around the world admire the taste, China is the 2nd largest trade partner of India, So you yourself can imagine the number of our veg consumed by Your people... And moreover We Dont have 650 million people In India suffering from toilet crisis, Have any credible source with you, If you have it please do post it, rather waster your time in here barking....

Chill dude I think he is really jealous of India
 

Doesn't matter, What reforms are you going to do when you wont have any people working at DRDO

More quit DRDO than join, applications fall by 70% in three years


Tucked away in a representation made to the Sixth Central Pay Commission by the Defence Research and Development Organisation are startling new figures that confirm how DRDO is not only unable to retain talent — it’s also not being able to attract it.


Records obtained by The Indian Express show that last year, the latest for which data is available, the number of scientists who resigned from the organization touched an all-time high of 321. Most of them were young scientists from the electronics and computer disciplines. While several factors have been cited, a majority of the scientists who have resigned attribute it to better career opportunities elsewhere and lack of professional challenge.

In fact, 2006 is the first year that the number of resignations at DRDO has surpassed the number of inductions, 300. In other words, induction is not keeping pace with attrition resulting in a significant shortfall of trained scientists.

This isn’t surprising given the steady fall in the number of applications to what is considered the government’s premier defence research institution — in 2003, while total applicants numbered 110,224, in 2006, that figure came down to less than a third of that: 31,810.


The DRDO’s representation to the Pay Commission underlines the need to build an efficient and talented pool of scientists dedicated for a minimum of 15 to 20 years considering the long gestation period for developing defence-warfare systems. Advocating more “freedom, flexibility and opportunities for self-development” to scientists, the proposal calls for rewards of recognition.

Towards this, the DRDO has proposed an entry-level scale of Rs 48,000-120,000 per month — almost six times the current level of Rs 8000-13000, going upto Rs 500,000 (fixed) per month at the highest level, advisor to the Defence Minister.

Besides this, other demands include sabbatical, intellectual capital pay, loyalty bonus and 40% share of royalty/fees earned due to commercialization of inventions and rewards.
 
Come on, give me a break, stop giving me some crap clip, Ok?

Just answer me a damn simple question, Who is the stronger one ?

Both military and economy ,China or India, simple honest answer,

No BS please.:smitten::pakistan::china:

India
because you cannot attack India to get arunachal pradesh :bunny:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom