lonelyman
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2015
- Messages
- 3,737
- Reaction score
- -14
- Country
- Location
Is this in the comparability zone to the mighty ohio-class? (serious question)
It doesn't even has a nuclear reactor
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is this in the comparability zone to the mighty ohio-class? (serious question)
LOL. This is more like the George Washington class build in 1957. And that is being generous. India is the first country in the world to build a SSBN before a SSN. So India has zero nuclear sub construction experience prior to build this sub.
Hence India being a poor nation
When India uses models in its parade to delude its gullible masses of shupremness of its military isn't it obvious it would have a plane built specifically for paradesThat is why India need single engine aircraft as Tejas turn out to be a parade plane.
Can you really blame us Indians for it, when India own founding father bragged about sending 10K women to USA for some perverted purposesIndians being quiet and humble, these two qualities just don't sync well with Indians.
No news is probably good news. As far as I can tell, the Arihant seems operational but limited to testing technologies for future SSBNs and SSNs. Hence the size. But despite the first attempt, its not a bad sub, for one its not radiating the crew as far as we know or leaking radiation at the docks. But the Indian navy still has a long way to go to testing technology and operations associated with nuclear subs most importantly damage control, and rescuing crew.At least copying requires you to dissect the technology, you are basically getting spoon fed like a baby and even then you can fck up the reactor. What makes you think the reactor is not noisy?
More like late 80's Soviet subs with extra features and short comings. For one India does not have the setup USN and Red Navy has to form a deterrent yet. A decade away before USN takes them seriously even in IOR. This was why the Red navy showed up in India with a nuclear sub rescue boat. Not sure if they are still deployed.Is this in the comparability zone to the mighty ohio-class? (serious question)
Much better to ask for assistance, than steal the technology, claim it as your own and then come with piss poor submarines such as Han.
Huh? That's was Mao joking to Kissinger about the huge population of China. What has it got to do with Indians innate quality to boast and brag, it's well known through out the world.When India uses models in its parade to delude its gullible masses of shupremness of its military isn't it obvious it would have a plane built specifically for parades
https://www.theepochtimes.com/c-regime
Can you really blame us Indians for it, when India own founding father bragged about sending 10K women to USA for some perverted purposes
http://www.theage.com.au/news/world/what-mao-said-to-henry/2008/02/13/1202760396322.html
It's again speculation that Aridhman was the name of 3rd boat.Aridhaman was a better name.
Hopefully it'll be used for another.
No it's same as Arihant.Twice the capacity.
No. Even the next SSBN class(5th boat) will be at least 30 percentage less in specifications, and I am not even talking about technological gap.Is this in the comparability zone to the mighty ohio-class? (serious question)
No it has same VLS tube as in Arihant.INS Arighat has 8 launch tubes which carry 24 K-15 SLBMs or 8 K-4 SLBMs.
Where as Ohio class carries 24 Trident SLBMs.
Bull$hit ..India has built German HDW and French Scorpene subs which diesel subs but reactor miniaturization for Arihant class was done by Russians.
She has operated Soviet Charlie class nuclear sub and currently operates Russian Akula II class SSN.
No it's same as Arihant.
I suspect the Indian 2nd SSBN launch is half crook. That is why they keep quiet. Its not even 30% near operation but the India defense industries need some accountability to brag about their achievement to get more funding by launching it.
Just like the half crooked INS Vikrat with island less launched while its many years away from operation.
It’s not quiet enough as it show up in PDF. Now the brag machine would go full gear.
Agree. Indian military equipment serve to brag so its leaders can win elections. It’s not created for actual war. All equipments for actual war are imported ones. That is why India need single engine aircraft as Tejas turn out to be a parade plane.
It doesn't even has a nuclear reactor
Buying aircraft (250 million $ a piece) which is 3 times more expensive than F-35:
View attachment 442212
Poor India it is.
Lol
Please understand its a Chinese speaking about elections and given their nation's immense experience with democratic form of Govt, of course nuclear subs can win Gujarat electionsYa right nuclear subs can win Gujarat elections
When India uses models in its parade to delude its gullible masses of shupremness of its military isn't it obvious it would have a plane built specifically for parades
https://www.theepochtimes.com/c-regime
Can you really blame us Indians for it, when India own founding father bragged about sending 10K women to USA for some perverted purposes
http://www.theage.com.au/news/world/what-mao-said-to-henry/2008/02/13/1202760396322.html