What's new

India plans to deport 40,000 Rohingyas

Under Muslims zamindars Hindus stopped existing.
I don't care what Muslims has to pay as taxes but why do I have to give tax for not being a Muslim? That's your secularism??
Because you are a citizen of a country and you need to pay for civil and military amenities. YOu think Muslim rulers were just prophet and saints who will waive taxes for the Hindus?
There were no Muslim zamindar.. but muslim collectors.

You are not looking at the big picture here.

Some Rohingya did come during British rule but others have been in Myanmar since the 1400s.
Even the ones that came during British rule have every right to stay in Myanmar as they were in the land when Myanmar became independent in 1948. No other colonised country in the world has tried this excuse to cleanse it's own people.
Indic people were there all the time even before 1400s. As people used to follow Hinudism and Buddhism they were not counted as Muslims and counted as Rakhine. As most of the Hindus and Buddhist converted in Bengal so did it Myanmar after this time period. This is one of the thing people just omit.

BD can easily defeat Myanmar but now is not the right time due to current world geopolitical situation.

With 10-15 years then the window will open to take whatever chunk of Myanmar BD wants.:D
Bangladesh does not need to do anything. It will come naturally. These Rohingyas will never become Burmese from their heart.
 
.
Bangladesh does not need to do anything. It will come naturally. These Rohingyas will never become Burmese from their heart.

Myanmar is an artificial legal entity that is sure to split.

BD needs to be in a position to provide whatever assistance the Rohingya need when the time comes.
 
.
D can easily defeat Myanmar but now is not the right time due to current world geopolitical situation.

Within 10-15 years then the window will open to take whatever chunk of Myanmar BD wants.:D

Lol easily defeat.?
Ok. U can dream whatever u want.
Dreaming is no cost. :P
 
.
Myanmar is an artificial legal entity that is sure to split.

BD needs to be in a position to provide whatever assistance the Rohingya need when the time comes.
AL government will not do it as they think that will empower Jamat and BNP. BNP will not do it dreaming of a non Indian peaceful neighbour.
But I suggest BD does not get involved militarily but diplomatically. Periodically put them before HR and UN and keep sanction in place. Keeping pressure will also drive out genuine FDI. Just keeping them poor should be the main goal. It will disintegrate from within.
 
Last edited:
.
Lol most of the countries in this world founded by invasion. So by ur logic , BD need to give independence for ur minority like chakma coz u guys steal their land. :D
Chakmas were pirates.Who came into these lands.
Yes invasion not drive out.Thats the logic Burmese fail to understand.

Lol easily defeat.?
Ok. U can dream whatever u want.
Dreaming is no cost. :P
Is that the reason why there's no one united myanmar?
 
.
AL government will not do it as they think that will empower Jamat and BNP. BNP will not do it dreaming of a non Indian peaceful neighbour.
But I suggest BD does not get involved militarily but diplomatically. Periodically put them before HR and UN and keep sanction in place. Keeping pressure will also drive out genuine FDI. Just keeping them poor should be the main goal. It will disintegrate from within.

BD should never rule out the military option.

Once Myanmar starts to disintegrate, then BD should be ready to grab as much of it as possible.
 
.
BD should never rule out the military option.

Once Myanmar starts to disintegrate, then BD should be ready to grab as much of it as possible.
Patience my friend... patience.
 
.
How many Rohingyas have you adopted?

How many refugees are there in your home?

We have 20 million of you idiots in my land.
which land u demanding yourself, West Bengal, Tripura, Asam, Mizoram, Meghaloy all are belongs to Bangladesh. India looted it from BD 1947.they are living their own land understand u loafer people.
 
.
This thread is about what India plans. Shouldn't it be in Indian section?


Well, anyway BD forum are flooded with sh!t these days......ruins the mood to discuss anything.
 
.
Because you are a citizen of a country and you need to pay for civil and military amenities. YOu think Muslim rulers were just prophet and saints who will waive taxes for the Hindus?
There were no Muslim zamindar.. but muslim collectors.
You support a tax systems and talk about Muslims being the first secularists in the world.o_O
Why not impose a similar tax structure on everyone and not different ones for not being a Muslims.
 
.
I think there is a way out. Convert all these people in to Hinduism. Also change their names and everything. See that they practice Hinduism day in day out till two generation.
 
.
I think there is a way out. Convert all these people in to Hinduism. Also change their names and everything. See that they practice Hinduism day in day out till two generation.
Try Ghar Wapsi... :lol:

You support a tax systems and talk about Muslims being the first secularists in the world.o_O
Why not impose a similar tax structure on everyone and not different ones for not being a Muslims.
Tax structure were similar, you just dont want to see it.
Jazia was 10% for non muslims, Osul was 10% for muslims. If a muslim serve in the army he is waived. If a hindu want a waiver in the army he is required to pay 10%.
 
.
Try Ghar Wapsi... :lol:
Tax structure were similar, you just dont want to see it.
Jazia was 10% for non muslims, Osul was 10% for muslims. If a muslim serve in the army he is waived. If a hindu want a waiver in the army he is required to pay 10%.
You don't get it.
Why a tax system based on Muslims and Non-Muslims?
It is clearly against the basic principles of secularism.
 
.
Jazia was 10% for non muslims, Osul was 10% for muslims. If a muslim serve in the army he is waived. If a hindu want a waiver in the army he is required to pay 10%.
Nonsense. The pact of Umar has no mention of this nonsense. Jizya was and is obligatory upon non believers (that too only the People of the Book).The penalty is death or conversion. Period.

I think there is a way out. Convert all these people in to Hinduism. Also change their names and everything. See that they practice Hinduism day in day out till two generation.
That is possible.

But think.

They could not live peacefully among Buddhists - probably one of the most peaceful people on Earth. How willing will they be to be Hindus?
 
.
It is a well known fact that the British encouraged last scale immigration from what is now Bangladesh in to the Arakan region,

What well known fact are you talking about? There were all kinds of settlements from among both Indian Muslims and Hindus during the British rule. But, none was in Arakan. It was mostly in Rangoon. Rohingyas are different from them, and they do not regard the Indian Muslim settlers as their own.

Immediately after Burma got independence from England, it started expelling all the Indians irrespective of their religion. Rohingyas are different people than this group of Indian settlers. Do not please mismatch all the chapters of history in one single paragraph.
 
.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom