India Military Eyes Combined Threat

[Sasquatch]

So what if Muslims in India are flourishing and growing at faster pace than ones in China..you say as if it is bad thing ..weather India is Hindu, Muslim, Sikhs or Christian majority ..India would remain the same secular democratic self.

No not really your making assumptions up now. it does not matter if it's majority Muslim or not we will be friends with anyone who wants to be friends with our, I agree Secularism in my opinion is best. lets get back on topic shall we

 

[Sasquatch]

Thankfully this thread is not about Muslims in India and China so could we get back to topic now?

As for the border disputes, India Accepted Tibet apart of China that also means that South Tibet as well, but to what you may believe all we want is Tawang.

---------- Post added at 10:48 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:46 AM ----------

This black spot is all we want and our border dispute is solved.

 

[ares]

As for the border disputes, India Accepted Tibet apart of China that also means that South Tibet as well, but to what you may believe all we want is Tawang.

Well if following that kind of analogy then Tibetans them selves accepted that what you call South Tibet is a part of India ..so here we go ..and we but just want Aksai chin.

 

[Sasquatch]

Well if following that king analogy then Tibetans them selves accepted that what you call South Tibet is part of India ..so here we go ..and we but just want Aksai chin.

But India accepted Tibet as apart of china as far as I know it's not up to the Tibetans. Aksai Chin for Tawang ?

 

[ares]

But India accepted Tibet as apart of china as far as I know it's not up to the Tibetans. Aksai Chin for Tawang ?

India accepted Tibet as part of Peoples republic of China in 1950s .(there was no Peoples republic of China before 1949 ). Where as Tibetans accepted the Macmohan line in 1914.

How about just status quo?

 

[BanglaBhoot]

As for the border disputes, India Accepted Tibet apart of China that also means that South Tibet as well, but to what you may believe all we want is Tawang.

---------- Post added at 10:48 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:46 AM ----------

This black spot is all we want and our border dispute is solved.

It has been Indian stubbornness that this has not been resolved through a fair trade. Since China accepted Sikkim as part of India then New Delhi should accept Chinese claim on Tawang. End of dispute.

 

[Sasquatch]

India accepted Tibet as part of Peoples republic of China in 1950s .(there was no Peoples republic of China before 1949 ). Where as Tibetans accepted the Macmohan line in 1914.
How about just status quo?

Tibetans aren't in charge of the PRC, either the way the disputes will have to be solved.

 

[ares]

It has been Indian stubbornness that this has not been resolved through a fair trade. Since China accepted Sikkim as part of India then New Delhi should accept Chinese claim on Tawang. End of dispute.

How about we reverse this..Since India accepted Chinese claim on Tibet ..they should accept Indian claim on AP?

 

[Sasquatch]

It has been Indian stubbornness that this has not been resolved through a fair trade. Since China accepted Sikkim as part of India then New Delhi should accept Chinese claim on Tawang. End of dispute.

India want's many railways and roads open that lead to the Tibetan Region part of the border talks were if it went successful then we would open the roads so it would help trade near China India Borders and help Indian side Flourish.

 

[ares]

Tibetans aren't in charge of the PRC, either the way the disputes will have to be solved.

Well there wasn't PRC..when the agreements were signed.

 

[Sasquatch]

Well there wasn't PRC..when the agreements were signed.

But the disputes are still here hence it will need to be solved if talks go well India would benefit.

 

[BanglaBhoot]

How about we reverse this..Since India accepted Chinese claim on Tibet ..they should accept Indian claim on AP?

Or move this forward and China trades Aksai Chin for Tawang. Would India accept? I believe this has been unofficially on the table for decades but India has resisted any trades. Also Tibet was never part of India so New Delhi accepting Chinese claim on the territory is irrelevant.

 

[ares]

But the disputes are still here hence it will need to be solved if talks go well India would benefit.

These disputes are too coplex..Chinese are not getting Tawang any sooner than..Indians are getting Aksai Chin or Pakistanis are getting Kashmir.

Land disputes are usually unsolvable..only way forward is to maintain a status quo and go about business as usual.

 

[Sasquatch]

These disputes are too coplex..Chinese are not getting Tawang any sooner than..Indians are getting Aksai Chin or Pakistanis are getting Kashmir.

Land disputes are usually unsolvable..only way forward is to maintain a status quo and go about business as usual.

That's why Talks keep going, as for Tawang it's not as complex as Kashmir.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

Land disputes are usually unsolvable..only way forward is to maintain a status quo and go about business as usual.

Yes, and meanwhile you can count on us sinking your hopes of getting a Permanent Seat in the UNSC and continuing to support any groups there that Pakistan wants us to support.

Until the territorial dispute is solved at least.