What's new

India hosting Myanmar leader doesn’t give good impression: Bangladesh leader

Sour grapes?
You are wrong. We are not buying. They are just giving.
31 yrs old junkie with Klub S anti ship cruise missile is more than enough to tackle the second-hand BN.
sour grapes??!! lol....junks r junks...there is a reason that india sold that junk though india herself doesnt have enuf....nd ofcourse our mings with ET-40s will sit idle whenever u try to misadventure..
So is your Chinese ming sub, with no air defense and cruise missile... :disagree::disagree::crazy::crazy:

View attachment 572390

we only have one year difference, idiot.

View attachment 572391
nice..wikipedia!!:lol::lol:..nd 5-6 kms missiles,u call that air defence??!! :lol::lol:
 
Two Type 35G operated by BN was built between 1994-1996, which makes them 25-27 years old. They were bought by BN in 2014 & commissioned in 2016.

They received extensive MLU & refitting. Extending the life to 2030 least. All sensors were replaced & propulsion systems were extensively refitted.

According to @grey boy 2 Two modified Type 35G were supposed to be built in Bangladesh with Chinese assistance.

That most probably explains the huge cost of Submarine base deal with Poly group ( same company that sold BN the current two).

http://
slide.mil.news.sina.com.cn/h/
slide_8_203_46596.html#p=8
 
Knowing that Bangladeshis are inherently bigoted, I would ignore the bigotry you have been peddling here, but simple association doesn't automatically bring civilization and glory, otherwise Bangladeshis would have become civilized by now. A kings pet dog is still a dog. :)

Just let him be lol, let him live in his fantasy world. You have no idea how much he gets upset reading fellow bong testimony here that they get befuddled looks and stares from everyone in the world regarding word "Bangladesh" and if its a city in India :lol:.


You want me to quote more about BD and people like you according to grey boy? It will make you pull a jamati fuse (kaboom).
 
Two Type 35G operated by BN was built between 1994-1996, which makes them 25-27 years old. They were bought by BN in 2014 & commissioned in 2016.

Nope. BNS Nabajatra is ex pennant number 356 of PLAN submarine force. it was the first ship of its kind. It was launched in 1989 and entered service in 1990. launched date of another one , ex pennant number 367 was also not much different with 356. so both are almost 30 years old.
 
Nope. BNS Nabajatra is ex pennant number 356 of PLAN submarine force. it was the first ship of its kind. It was launched in 1989 and entered service in 1990. launched date of another one , ex pennant number 367 was also not much different with 356. so both are almost 30 years old.

Wrong.

According to some sources Pennant number of BNS Nabajatra was 357.

Point is, Pennant number of the two subs involved were never published officially. So Wikipedia can't be a reliable source on this matter.

But according to purchase deal the oldest one was 24 years old during the signing of the deal, this was published by many news outlets. Do your research before posting.
 
Last edited:
Following Abrahamic civilization itself is a glory. Associating yourself to evolved human civilization. On the other hand neanderthal Dharmic people cant call themselves fully evolved human beings. Its bewond funny when cow worshipper Dharmics ask about civilization.

1000% true, Abrahamic civilization is superior, period.

Knowing that Bangladeshis are inherently bigoted, I would ignore the bigotry you have been peddling here, but simple association doesn't automatically bring civilization and glory, otherwise Bangladeshis would have become civilized by now.

This is a scene outside a temple in Bihar where a dustbin was kept for the first time and people mistook it as some god :rofl: It happens only in India so called high civilization :rofl:
 
Last edited:
My bad brah!

How could you fight when you were too busy running! (and getting shot down).....(and lying!)

View attachment 572041

As I said we fought, we have losses and your useless rants wouldnt prove less that current Bangladeshis are pussy cats. Burma showed that pretty perfectly. You guys wouldnt even fight. Just good enough for online bravado. Shoo.
 
As I said we fought, we have losses and your useless rants wouldnt prove less that current Bangladeshis are pussy cats. Burma showed that pretty perfectly. You guys wouldnt even fight. Just good enough for online bravado. Shoo.

LOL.

No bravado here pal.

Rather, its you Indians that have departed from reality.

Whether its online individuals, your media, or for that matter your Choo tia government of the highest order.
 
As I said we fought, we have losses and your useless rants wouldnt prove less that current Bangladeshis are pussy cats. Burma showed that pretty perfectly. You guys wouldnt even fight. Just good enough for online bravado. Shoo.



Slapped around by a country 1/7th your population!

:rofl:

That is the ULTIMATE HUMILIATION.
 
Slapped around by a country 1/7th your population!

:rofl:

That is the ULTIMATE HUMILIATION.

Yea we got you freedom from murder and rapings from the 1/7of the population and 50-50 of your population. Humiliation? You should be immersed in it greatless beedie.
 
Yea we got you freedom from murder and rapings from the 1/7of the population and 50-50 of your population. Humiliation? You should be immersed in it greatless beedie.
You had done nothing. But you finally came to steal our glory from us.
It's Bangladeshi common folks fought under East Bengal regiment. And later you invaded Pakistan and also sent your army to formerly east Pakistan and now Bangladesh.

You successfully robbed some glory of our freedom fighters because snobbish Pakistani soldiers surrendered to you. They ( Pakistan) also mistakenly believed that Bangladesh is a result of your conspiracy.

In reality our freedom fight was internal matter of Pakistan ; it was war between West and East Pakistan when we declared independence and then we achieved it. From where does India come here? It's achieved by our freedom fighters and all credit go to them, India has zero credit, case closed.
 
Last edited:
India and Myanmar are sending a strong message to China – with a submarine

The Indian Navy’s decision to transfer one of its Kilo-class diesel-electric submarines, INS Sindhuvir, to Myanmar hopes to limit Chinese military influence and aid Myanmar in its emerging naval competition with Bangladesh. On its part, Myanmar helps India secure its own maritime interests in the Bay of Bengal region.

Myanmar Commander-in-Chief Senior General Min Aung Hlaing had visited Delhi last month, during which India and Myanmar signed a defence cooperation agreement.

India’s willingness to transfer a frontline submarine when it is facing a shortage of such platforms reveals a desire on New Delhi’s part to consolidate the growing convergence in security interests with Myanmar. Gone is the time when there were fears of Myanmar offering a ‘second coast’ to China. Instead, the Indian Navy and the Myanmar Navy today conduct institutionalised joint patrols, and India is constructing connectivity corridors of its own in Myanmar in the form of the Kaladan project.

Myanmar’s own quest to acquire an undersea capability was hastened after Bangladesh’s acquisition of two old Type 35G Ming-class submarines from China in 2017. Notably, Myanmar has not turned to China to fulfil this requirement. Over the years, Myanmar military officials have voiced concerns about the quality of Chinese equipment supplied to them. Moreover, with Bangladesh wholly dependent on Chinese support for its new naval teeth, Myanmar would ideally want to look elsewhere to get platforms that can give it an edge.

As such, Myanmar has adopted a more diverse approach than Bangladesh on sourcing equipment for its naval modernisation. Although Myanmar set up its key naval dockyard with Chinese input, it has turned to India and Russia for sensors and weapons to equip the warships being constructed there.

For instance, the Myanmar Navy’s latest warship design, the Kyan Sittha-class frigate, has a mix of equipment from India, China, and Russia. In particular, the Myanmar Navy has sought Indian ship-borne sensors with each ship of the Kyan Sittha-class outfitted with a DRDO-Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL) HMS-X hull-mounted sonar and BEL supplied search radar. Last month, India also delivered the first batch of the indigenous ‘Shyena’ light torpedo, which will arm these ships, as part of a deal worth $37.9 million signed in 2017.

Myanmar’s China worry

The Indian Navy Kilo-class submarine due to be transferred to Myanmar is also likely to feature export versions of Indian naval sensors such as the SMX2, which is a submarine sonar suite developed for the international market by the Defence Research and Development Organisation. Although ostensibly being transferred for training purposes, the offensive potential of this submarine is undeniable, given that it is significantly more capable than the older Ming-class submarine, which the Bangladesh Navy operates.

On the other hand, Myanmar is extremely worried about the uninterrupted growth of the China-supported Wa and Kokang rebel groups that operate in its Shan state. In this context, Myanmar’s desire to rebalance its security architecture away from dependence on China is understandable. This would also be in keeping with its traditional policy of not becoming beholden to either China or India, while looking to extract benefits from either side.

An example of this is Myanmar’s renegotiation of the terms for the development of the Kyaukpyu Port project, which will now receive only a fraction of the initially proposed level of Chinese investment. Nonetheless, Kyaukpyu is indeed being constructed as part of the China-Myanmar Economic Corridor, which itself is part of the Belt and Road Initiative. And India cannot afford to let Kyaukpyu end up hosting a Chinese naval element given its location in the North-Eastern corner of Bay of Bengal.

India, the helping hand

India’s decision to transfer a submarine is, therefore, a sort of inducement to encourage Myanmar to stick to its time-tested policy, while also building on the extant synergy in security ties. What helps India’s cause is that Myanmar is once again at the receiving end of Western opprobrium over the Rohingya issue and is looking for support from Asian democracies such as India. New Delhi obliged by inviting Commander-in-Chief Hlaing to visit India right after the US announced a visa ban on him.

This commitment to continuity in ties is reflected in the new defence agreement, which, among other things, intends to ‘strengthen maritime security by joint surveillance and capacity building’. Clearly, the submarine transfer with its sensor fit would aid such an agenda.

Meanwhile, for Bangladesh, which vehemently opposed Hlaing’s visit on account of the Rohingya issue, the message from India is clear: ‘Perhaps you should consider diversifying your sources of supply as well’.

The author is a former consultant to FICCI’s International Division and Chief Editor of Delhi Defence Review. His Twitter handle is @SJha1618. Views are personal.

Separate fact from fiction, the real from the fake going viral on social media, on HoaXposed

https://theprint.in/opinion/india-i...are-sending-a-strong-message-to-china/272240/
 
India and Myanmar are sending a strong message to China – with a submarine

The Indian Navy’s decision to transfer one of its Kilo-class diesel-electric submarines, INS Sindhuvir, to Myanmar hopes to limit Chinese military influence and aid Myanmar in its emerging naval competition with Bangladesh. On its part, Myanmar helps India secure its own maritime interests in the Bay of Bengal region.

Myanmar Commander-in-Chief Senior General Min Aung Hlaing had visited Delhi last month, during which India and Myanmar signed a defence cooperation agreement.

India’s willingness to transfer a frontline submarine when it is facing a shortage of such platforms reveals a desire on New Delhi’s part to consolidate the growing convergence in security interests with Myanmar. Gone is the time when there were fears of Myanmar offering a ‘second coast’ to China. Instead, the Indian Navy and the Myanmar Navy today conduct institutionalised joint patrols, and India is constructing connectivity corridors of its own in Myanmar in the form of the Kaladan project.

Myanmar’s own quest to acquire an undersea capability was hastened after Bangladesh’s acquisition of two old Type 35G Ming-class submarines from China in 2017. Notably, Myanmar has not turned to China to fulfil this requirement. Over the years, Myanmar military officials have voiced concerns about the quality of Chinese equipment supplied to them. Moreover, with Bangladesh wholly dependent on Chinese support for its new naval teeth, Myanmar would ideally want to look elsewhere to get platforms that can give it an edge.

As such, Myanmar has adopted a more diverse approach than Bangladesh on sourcing equipment for its naval modernisation. Although Myanmar set up its key naval dockyard with Chinese input, it has turned to India and Russia for sensors and weapons to equip the warships being constructed there.

For instance, the Myanmar Navy’s latest warship design, the Kyan Sittha-class frigate, has a mix of equipment from India, China, and Russia. In particular, the Myanmar Navy has sought Indian ship-borne sensors with each ship of the Kyan Sittha-class outfitted with a DRDO-Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL) HMS-X hull-mounted sonar and BEL supplied search radar. Last month, India also delivered the first batch of the indigenous ‘Shyena’ light torpedo, which will arm these ships, as part of a deal worth $37.9 million signed in 2017.

Myanmar’s China worry

The Indian Navy Kilo-class submarine due to be transferred to Myanmar is also likely to feature export versions of Indian naval sensors such as the SMX2, which is a submarine sonar suite developed for the international market by the Defence Research and Development Organisation. Although ostensibly being transferred for training purposes, the offensive potential of this submarine is undeniable, given that it is significantly more capable than the older Ming-class submarine, which the Bangladesh Navy operates.

On the other hand, Myanmar is extremely worried about the uninterrupted growth of the China-supported Wa and Kokang rebel groups that operate in its Shan state. In this context, Myanmar’s desire to rebalance its security architecture away from dependence on China is understandable. This would also be in keeping with its traditional policy of not becoming beholden to either China or India, while looking to extract benefits from either side.

An example of this is Myanmar’s renegotiation of the terms for the development of the Kyaukpyu Port project, which will now receive only a fraction of the initially proposed level of Chinese investment. Nonetheless, Kyaukpyu is indeed being constructed as part of the China-Myanmar Economic Corridor, which itself is part of the Belt and Road Initiative. And India cannot afford to let Kyaukpyu end up hosting a Chinese naval element given its location in the North-Eastern corner of Bay of Bengal.

India, the helping hand

India’s decision to transfer a submarine is, therefore, a sort of inducement to encourage Myanmar to stick to its time-tested policy, while also building on the extant synergy in security ties. What helps India’s cause is that Myanmar is once again at the receiving end of Western opprobrium over the Rohingya issue and is looking for support from Asian democracies such as India. New Delhi obliged by inviting Commander-in-Chief Hlaing to visit India right after the US announced a visa ban on him.

This commitment to continuity in ties is reflected in the new defence agreement, which, among other things, intends to ‘strengthen maritime security by joint surveillance and capacity building’. Clearly, the submarine transfer with its sensor fit would aid such an agenda.

Meanwhile, for Bangladesh, which vehemently opposed Hlaing’s visit on account of the Rohingya issue, the message from India is clear: ‘Perhaps you should consider diversifying your sources of supply as well’.

The author is a former consultant to FICCI’s International Division and Chief Editor of Delhi Defence Review. His Twitter handle is @SJha1618. Views are personal.

Separate fact from fiction, the real from the fake going viral on social media, on HoaXposed

https://theprint.in/opinion/india-i...are-sending-a-strong-message-to-china/272240/

Myanmar sending strong message to China...
Talk about it before next Security Council meeting.. :)
 
India and Myanmar are sending a strong message to China – with a submarine

The Indian Navy’s decision to transfer one of its Kilo-class diesel-electric submarines, INS Sindhuvir, to Myanmar hopes to limit Chinese military influence and aid Myanmar in its emerging naval competition with Bangladesh. On its part, Myanmar helps India secure its own maritime interests in the Bay of Bengal region.

Myanmar Commander-in-Chief Senior General Min Aung Hlaing had visited Delhi last month, during which India and Myanmar signed a defence cooperation agreement.

India’s willingness to transfer a frontline submarine when it is facing a shortage of such platforms reveals a desire on New Delhi’s part to consolidate the growing convergence in security interests with Myanmar. Gone is the time when there were fears of Myanmar offering a ‘second coast’ to China. Instead, the Indian Navy and the Myanmar Navy today conduct institutionalised joint patrols, and India is constructing connectivity corridors of its own in Myanmar in the form of the Kaladan project.

Myanmar’s own quest to acquire an undersea capability was hastened after Bangladesh’s acquisition of two old Type 35G Ming-class submarines from China in 2017. Notably, Myanmar has not turned to China to fulfil this requirement. Over the years, Myanmar military officials have voiced concerns about the quality of Chinese equipment supplied to them. Moreover, with Bangladesh wholly dependent on Chinese support for its new naval teeth, Myanmar would ideally want to look elsewhere to get platforms that can give it an edge.

As such, Myanmar has adopted a more diverse approach than Bangladesh on sourcing equipment for its naval modernisation. Although Myanmar set up its key naval dockyard with Chinese input, it has turned to India and Russia for sensors and weapons to equip the warships being constructed there.

For instance, the Myanmar Navy’s latest warship design, the Kyan Sittha-class frigate, has a mix of equipment from India, China, and Russia. In particular, the Myanmar Navy has sought Indian ship-borne sensors with each ship of the Kyan Sittha-class outfitted with a DRDO-Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL) HMS-X hull-mounted sonar and BEL supplied search radar. Last month, India also delivered the first batch of the indigenous ‘Shyena’ light torpedo, which will arm these ships, as part of a deal worth $37.9 million signed in 2017.

Myanmar’s China worry

The Indian Navy Kilo-class submarine due to be transferred to Myanmar is also likely to feature export versions of Indian naval sensors such as the SMX2, which is a submarine sonar suite developed for the international market by the Defence Research and Development Organisation. Although ostensibly being transferred for training purposes, the offensive potential of this submarine is undeniable, given that it is significantly more capable than the older Ming-class submarine, which the Bangladesh Navy operates.

On the other hand, Myanmar is extremely worried about the uninterrupted growth of the China-supported Wa and Kokang rebel groups that operate in its Shan state. In this context, Myanmar’s desire to rebalance its security architecture away from dependence on China is understandable. This would also be in keeping with its traditional policy of not becoming beholden to either China or India, while looking to extract benefits from either side.

An example of this is Myanmar’s renegotiation of the terms for the development of the Kyaukpyu Port project, which will now receive only a fraction of the initially proposed level of Chinese investment. Nonetheless, Kyaukpyu is indeed being constructed as part of the China-Myanmar Economic Corridor, which itself is part of the Belt and Road Initiative. And India cannot afford to let Kyaukpyu end up hosting a Chinese naval element given its location in the North-Eastern corner of Bay of Bengal.

India, the helping hand

India’s decision to transfer a submarine is, therefore, a sort of inducement to encourage Myanmar to stick to its time-tested policy, while also building on the extant synergy in security ties. What helps India’s cause is that Myanmar is once again at the receiving end of Western opprobrium over the Rohingya issue and is looking for support from Asian democracies such as India. New Delhi obliged by inviting Commander-in-Chief Hlaing to visit India right after the US announced a visa ban on him.

This commitment to continuity in ties is reflected in the new defence agreement, which, among other things, intends to ‘strengthen maritime security by joint surveillance and capacity building’. Clearly, the submarine transfer with its sensor fit would aid such an agenda.

Meanwhile, for Bangladesh, which vehemently opposed Hlaing’s visit on account of the Rohingya issue, the message from India is clear: ‘Perhaps you should consider diversifying your sources of supply as well’.

The author is a former consultant to FICCI’s International Division and Chief Editor of Delhi Defence Review. His Twitter handle is @SJha1618. Views are personal.

Separate fact from fiction, the real from the fake going viral on social media, on HoaXposed

https://theprint.in/opinion/india-i...are-sending-a-strong-message-to-china/272240/

LOL.

Indian drama strikes again!

There is some truth to the article especially the title.

But overall its about what you would expect from an Indian media source.

In terms of one of the key points of the article which is diversification of sources (which is Myanmar's strength..........lol)

I suppose its attempting to argue Bangladesh turn to India.

But we have UK, Turkey, China, Russia, South Korea, EU, and now perhaps the US.

So, sorry but no thanks!
 
Last edited:
LOL.

Indian drama strikes again!

There is some truth to the article especially the title.

But overall its about what you would expect from an Indian media source.

In terms of one of the key points of the article which is diversification of sources (which is Myanmar's strength..........lol)

I suppose its attempting to argue Bangladesh turn to India.

But we have UK, Turkey, China, Russia, South Korea, EU, and now perhaps the US.

So, sorry but no thanks!
These gangus clearly don't understand the wavelength BAL operates on. :lol:
 
Back
Top Bottom