India has forgotten lessons of 1962 war:Global Times

[oceanx]

Please do save yourself some basic dignity, learn the meaning of

"SHAME"

When your Indians A@S got kicked so badly in 1962, and you still got

the nerve,shamelessly challenging China ?

India’s China War by Neville Maxwell

First, you need a successful revenge inorder to regain your long lost

dignity and than talk. What a joke !!
l

This is where this whole thing descends ... must you do this, boy?

Anyways, nothing is new around here it seems (except for Sath not bringing up his Brahmanical "Star Charts" from 50,000 BC ... pity, pity.

 

[oceanx]

Forgot October 1967 ?

Link

Exactly as I feel - if the PRC must lay "claim" to someone from India as their own - instead of looking to liberate some "Mongoloid"-appearing NE semi-Tibetan tribes, the Nepalese Gurkhas are a much better bang for the buck ...

 

[grey boy 2]

Forgot October 1967 ?

We kicked your A@S badly , We never had any problems since then !



Link

HaHaHa, nice try, How many Chinese soldiers killed in 1967 ?

We kill 3000 plus in our cake walk in 1962.

Can you provide further source please ? May be something wrong

with my google search, can you help me out ?

 

[beckham]

Wow...that was below the red belt....

I was looking for the information ....you were faster than me on this one.

I have a way with trolls !

 

[King Julien]

chinese came in, dropped food cans, painted rock's to mark territory; we said nothing.....

Indians move an 75 year old man and chinese go mad

 

[PlanetWarrior]

Indian voters can gather en masse and stage a demonstration outside Indian parliament demanding that India goes to war with China. We can petitition our MPs and politicians and place pressure on our government to take a hardline policy. In China a selct group of the CCP decides Chinese policy. Every Indian poster who posts his or her view of how India should take on China can make it happen. The Chinese troll who here will most probably be shot dead by the CCP if they read the nonsense he has been posting here. Hope he got a license to use the internet or else

 

[beckham]

HaHaHa, nice try, How many Chinese soldiers killed in 1967 ?

We kill 3000 plus in our cake walk in 1962.

Can you provide further source please ? May be something wrong

with my google search, can you help me out ?

Here you go,

Sino-Indian relations - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Btw, where did you get that 3000 ? source please ?

 

[bandit]

Shooting Trash without backup=TROLLING.

Good day Troll.

P.S. If you have nothing to contribute about 1962 China-India

war, please kindly stay away.

Oh i thought you wouldnt want to go through the shame of reading some hard facts about your super duper forces....anyways try reading more about your own commies than be fascinated by India

The U.S. Navy was forced, by a "Freedom of Information" lawsuit, to release its data on Chinese submarine operations. The data showed that, while Chinese subs are putting to sea more often (a fact that has generated many headlines about the Chinese naval threat), they are still doing so much less than U.S. subs. In 2007, American subs went to sea for long term operations (this is called "patrols") seven times more often than Chinese boats. But the 55 Chinese subs went out on only six patrols in 2007, versus two in 2006 and none in 2005. Before that, through the 1990s, Chinese subs averaged 1.2 patrols a year. The one Chinese ballistic missile sub (SSBN) has never, in its 25 years of existence, gone out on a patrol.

This is not to say that the Chinese boats don't go out at all, but these are largely day trips, moving off shore into the open water, in order to train and test the equipment. But this is no replacement for the long term (two months or more) tours American boats have been doing since World War II. While the Chinese are modernizing their submarine force, half their boats are still basically obsolete diesel-electric designs. The U.S. nuclear submarine fleet contains more than half the nuclear boats in service worldwide.

But the major American problem is anti-submarine warfare, because even elderly diesel-electric boats have proved difficult to detect. So the U.S. Navy is rebuilding its anti-submarine capability. That may take a few more years, and the main goal is to keep ahead of Chinese developments. The biggest thing the Americans have going for them is that, while the Chinese are building more subs, they are not training with them. Why is that? Partly it's a matter of money, partly it's the poorly maintained equipment. But mostly it's fear of embarrassment. Over the last few years, there have been several disastrous accidents involving Chinese subs at sea. These were usually just the day trips for training. Boats broke down, sailors died (in one case, an entire crew). But the Chinese have to go to sea a lot more before they become a serious threat to the United States. If the jump in patrols last year is the start of a trend, then the threat is indeed growing. :

http://www.strategypage.com/dls/articles/200812720330.asp

Please note copy paste doesnt work all that well all the time. These are some showcase subs you got here.

 

[grey boy 2]

Good bye to all my Indian friends, nice chating with you all.

I have to go now, Oh, just for today. HaHaHa

Best wishes for you all = some sweet revenge dreams of 1962.

 

[Iggy]

Oh i thought you wouldnt want to go through the shame of reading some hard facts about your super duper forces....anyways try reading more about your own commies than be fascinated by India



Please note copy paste doesnt work all that well all the time. These are some showcase subs you got here.

OOps that hurts...i can already see the chinese reply..our submarine operations are secret..PLAN dont want enemies to know about our sub operations ..etc etc

 

[sathruvinasakh]

Here you go,

Sino-Indian relations - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Btw, where did you get that 3000 ? source please ?

i think a 1400 causalities for being unprepared and outnumbered is still impressive for India while inflicting half the number of causalities on the attackers who made a cake walk with huge and massive army

We had local news papers at that time here stating that the later skirmish on indo-sino border led to a major sino causalities .

BTW, dont ask any chinese member where he got his numbers or theory from? its an obvious CCP publications.

 

[beckham]

Good bye to all my Indian friends, nice chating with you all.

I have to go now, Oh, just for today. HaHaHa

Best wishes for you all = some sweet revenge dreams of 1962.

Chickening Out so soon ??

Just like old days ...

gud.nyte

 

[feifanke]

中印冲突备忘录


1963年以后，由于中国军队在中印边境的东西两段后撤，再度实行脱离接触隔离政策，双方武装部队直接接触地段仅限于中国和锡金边境（当时印军在锡金有2～3个山地步兵旅），中锡边界的印军不断地向中国军队进行挑衅，在中锡边境的乃堆拉山口，多次越过已划定的中锡边界，移动界碑，修筑工事，架设电话。飞机也多次侵入中国领空对西藏的康巴宗、亚东等地进行侦察。

　　1966年以后，中国国内掀起了“文化大革命”高潮，1967年，各地大规模武斗兴起，冲击军事机关抢夺武器的情况也来此起彼伏，动乱也或多或少地波及西藏。为对中国进行战略侦察，印军出动山地步兵第一一二旅、炮兵第十七旅于1967年9月11日至14日在中锡边界的乃堆拉山口向中国驻军发起了进攻。

　　此前的9月，印军不断强行越界架设铁丝网，中国驻军多次提出严重警告，印军置之不理。9月7日，印度士兵用刺刀刺伤两名中国士兵。9月11日清晨7时30分，印军山地步兵第一一二旅一个连在一名中校营长指挥下，分两路向乃堆拉山口的中国哨所逼近。中国驻军严守“不打第一枪”的纪律，保持克制态度，对入侵印军发出严重警告。印军将中国官兵的克制态度视为软弱可欺，8时零7分，首先开枪射击并投掷手榴弹，正向印军喊话的连长李彦成当场中弹牺牲，另有6名战士负伤。

　　当时中央军委对我边防守军有“针锋相对，寸土必争，绝不示弱，绝不吃亏”的指示，我边防团在忍无可忍的情况下，当即发起反击，仅7分钟，战斗结束，击毙印军官兵67人，用四０火箭筒将印军在中国境内设置的7处工事悉数摧毁。8时15分，印军败逃，我军严守纪律，未出境追击。

　　印军不甘失败，其炮兵第十七旅随即向中国境内发起大规模炮击。对此，中国军队早有准备。本来，中国军队对中锡边境的冲突的原则是“人员不能越境，子弹炮弹亦不能打到邻国土地上”，与中印边境冲突“人员绝不越过境，不能主动向印境内的炮兵射击，但遇敌方境内炮兵向我射击，坚决反击”有所不同，但此次印军气焰嚣张，经中央军委批准，我炮兵第叁０八团组织了30余门八二迫击炮和一二０迫击炮向印军还击。炮击历时4天3夜，将印军8个炮击阵地打哑，两个指挥所、两个观察所和23处工事及两辆汽车被摧毁，毙伤印军官兵540余人，印军炮兵不支，逐于13日22时停止炮击。

　　情况上报中央后，周恩来总理亲自指示：“敌人不打炮了，我也停止射击。”14日中午时分，我军也停击炮击。

　　此次作战，印军共伤亡607人，我军除敌挑衅时的一亡九伤外，基本无损。印军被迫打着白旗，到中国境内接受中国移交的印军尸体和武器弹药。

　　印军仍未死心，10月1日11时20分，印军廓尔喀联队一名排长率7名士兵侵入桌拉山口中国一侧，手持廓尔喀弯刀向中国士兵寻衅，中国士兵当场提出警告，廓尔喀佬不予置理，一拥而上，想把中国士兵绑架出境。闻讯赶到的附近哨所的中国官兵义愤填膺，抢出战友，将廓尔喀排长推出边界。廓尔喀兵恼羞成怒，拔出手枪向中国官兵射击，其余廓尔喀士兵也向中国官兵射击，当场打死打伤中国官兵各一人。同时，卓拉山口附近的印军炮兵也用51毫米和81毫米迫击炮向中国境内射击。

　　目赌战友牺牲的中国官兵立即还击，将入侵8名廓尔喀兵全部击毙。12时整，中国炮兵用猛烈的炮火压制印军炮火，将挑衅印军两个连的官兵毙伤大半（195名），摧毁工事29处。印军不支，遂于当晚19时55分停止炮击。

　　当时，兄弟还是个八九岁的毛孩子，有个叔叔在五十四军一叁０师当兵，他们也随之也取消休假，进入战备，待命入藏参战。但未过多久，因印方有和平解决争端的表示，任务取消，他们也就没有入藏。

　　此后，印军总结了中印边境战争的教训，知道中国军队有“不打第一枪”的原则，认定只要不开枪，就不会遭到中国军队打击，所以，有恃无恐地突破“各自后撤20公里脱离接触”的限制（实际上只是中国单方面后撤），不断地越过实际控制线，在中国军队眼皮下设点。到80年代，个别地区，甚至深入实际控制线中国一侧10公里。

　　1986年到1987年，中国边防守军根据军委指示，曾组织过多次挤占行动，87年局势达到过一触即发的程度，相当紧张。

==========================================

有人需要1987年的冲突记录么？

 

[grey boy 2]

Here you go,

Sino-Indian relations - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Btw, where did you get that 3000 ? source please ?

Ok, just for you "beckham"
1,383 Killed[5]
1,047 Wounded [5]
1,696 Missing[5]
3,968 Captured[5]

where do you think the 1696 missing end up ? 1383+1696=?

Sino-Indian War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


P.S. You still haven't answer my question, how many chinese soildiers being killed ? 1967

 

[beckham]

中印冲突备忘录


1963年以后，由于中国军队在中印边境的东西两段后撤，再度实行脱离接触隔离政策，双方武装部队直接接触地段仅限于中国和锡金边境（当时印军在锡金有2～3个山地步兵旅），中锡边界的印军不断地向中国军队进行挑衅，在中锡边境的乃堆拉山口，多次越过已划定的中锡边界，移动界碑，修筑工事，架设电话。飞机也多次侵入中国领空对西藏的康巴宗、亚东等地进行侦察。

　　1966年以后，中国国内掀起了“文化大革命”高潮，1967年，各地大规模武斗兴起，冲击军事机关抢夺武器的情况也来此起彼伏，动乱也或多或少地波及西藏。为对中国进行战略侦察，印军出动山地步兵第一一二旅、炮兵第十七旅于1967年9月11日至14日在中锡边界的乃堆拉山口向中国驻军发起了进攻。

　　此前的9月，印军不断强行越界架设铁丝网，中国驻军多次提出严重警告，印军置之不理。9月7日，印度士兵用刺刀刺伤两名中国士兵。9月11日清晨7时30分，印军山地步兵第一一二旅一个连在一名中校营长指挥下，分两路向乃堆拉山口的中国哨所逼近。中国驻军严守“不打第一枪”的纪律，保持克制态度，对入侵印军发出严重警告。印军将中国官兵的克制态度视为软弱可欺，8时零7分，首先开枪射击并投掷手榴弹，正向印军喊话的连长李彦成当场中弹牺牲，另有6名战士负伤。

　　当时中央军委对我边防守军有“针锋相对，寸土必争，绝不示弱，绝不吃亏”的指示，我边防团在忍无可忍的情况下，当即发起反击，仅7分钟，战斗结束，击毙印军官兵67人，用四０火箭筒将印军在中国境内设置的7处工事悉数摧毁。8时15分，印军败逃，我军严守纪律，未出境追击。

　　印军不甘失败，其炮兵第十七旅随即向中国境内发起大规模炮击。对此，中国军队早有准备。本来，中国军队对中锡边境的冲突的原则是“人员不能越境，子弹炮弹亦不能打到邻国土地上”，与中印边境冲突“人员绝不越过境，不能主动向印境内的炮兵射击，但遇敌方境内炮兵向我射击，坚决反击”有所不同，但此次印军气焰嚣张，经中央军委批准，我炮兵第叁０八团组织了30余门八二迫击炮和一二０迫击炮向印军还击。炮击历时4天3夜，将印军8个炮击阵地打哑，两个指挥所、两个观察所和23处工事及两辆汽车被摧毁，毙伤印军官兵540余人，印军炮兵不支，逐于13日22时停止炮击。

　　情况上报中央后，周恩来总理亲自指示：“敌人不打炮了，我也停止射击。”14日中午时分，我军也停击炮击。

　　此次作战，印军共伤亡607人，我军除敌挑衅时的一亡九伤外，基本无损。印军被迫打着白旗，到中国境内接受中国移交的印军尸体和武器弹药。

　　印军仍未死心，10月1日11时20分，印军廓尔喀联队一名排长率7名士兵侵入桌拉山口中国一侧，手持廓尔喀弯刀向中国士兵寻衅，中国士兵当场提出警告，廓尔喀佬不予置理，一拥而上，想把中国士兵绑架出境。闻讯赶到的附近哨所的中国官兵义愤填膺，抢出战友，将廓尔喀排长推出边界。廓尔喀兵恼羞成怒，拔出手枪向中国官兵射击，其余廓尔喀士兵也向中国官兵射击，当场打死打伤中国官兵各一人。同时，卓拉山口附近的印军炮兵也用51毫米和81毫米迫击炮向中国境内射击。

　　目赌战友牺牲的中国官兵立即还击，将入侵8名廓尔喀兵全部击毙。12时整，中国炮兵用猛烈的炮火压制印军炮火，将挑衅印军两个连的官兵毙伤大半（195名），摧毁工事29处。印军不支，遂于当晚19时55分停止炮击。

　　当时，兄弟还是个八九岁的毛孩子，有个叔叔在五十四军一叁０师当兵，他们也随之也取消休假，进入战备，待命入藏参战。但未过多久，因印方有和平解决争端的表示，任务取消，他们也就没有入藏。

　　此后，印军总结了中印边境战争的教训，知道中国军队有“不打第一枪”的原则，认定只要不开枪，就不会遭到中国军队打击，所以，有恃无恐地突破“各自后撤20公里脱离接触”的限制（实际上只是中国单方面后撤），不断地越过实际控制线，在中国军队眼皮下设点。到80年代，个别地区，甚至深入实际控制线中国一侧10公里。

　　1986年到1987年，中国边防守军根据军委指示，曾组织过多次挤占行动，87年局势达到过一触即发的程度，相当紧张。

==========================================

有人需要1987年的冲突记录么？

Can you translate this binary code for us ??