Raul_AD
BANNED
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2014
- Messages
- 796
- Reaction score
- -5
- Country
- Location
Both GSLV were big FAIL.
If MK2 was successful why ISRO made MK3? Why not increase capacity of MK2 and add cryo engine in MK2 itself?
ISRO is planning to "retire" all previouse GSLV. Successful nations don't do this. Russia has still kept Souz after 50 years. China still has long march many years later only improved but not abondoned.
GSLV-MK1 is retired because ALL THE "CRYOGENIC ENGINES" RECEIVED FROM "RUSSIA" ARE NOW CONSUMED.
It is no point discussing with cut!a like you. Who dont know that GSLV-MK2 has "CRYOGENIC ENGINE CE-7.5" in its UPPER STAGE. And it is no point in informing idiot like you about the difference in "CAPACITY" of "CRYOGENIC ENGINES" of GSLV-MK1 & GSLV-MK2 and other stages of both rockets.
Keep on posting your uneducated crap and entertain all the members here.
Last edited: