Remote sensing needs large no. of satellite you dimwit,your IQ is the type to compare 2 orbital launch of India to china's 56 and than think India is ahead.
Now do explain kind of bollywood technology makes India ahead of china in remote sensing?
You just read some dumb lndian media hearsay without having a clue of where Chinese US and Indian technology stands in the field.
But still wating for your try at explanation.
You don't know when to use what sentence if you wanna pull reverseuno card atleast find fitting relevant case .
BTW what does the mars mission gotta do with technology of cost reduction? what kind of stupid shit
Movie gravity was atleast profitable economically,unlike the waste of money over scientifically irrelevant mangalyaan done just for spectacle.
Mangalyaan only carries a small scientific payload weighing just 13 kg, for comparison tianwei-1 carried 3415 kg of scientific payload .
Mangalyaan placed in a 366 km x 80,000 km orbit that is so far from Mars that it can observe very little compared to US,Chinese and European Mars Global Surveyor and Mars Express have done and adds nothing much than what's already known.
Don't try too much you are incapable. Just because your braincells fails to register the fact that china with highest orbital lunch and 90% success rate doesn't need to prove anything against 50% success of isro or such, doesn't mean c hina don't do foreign satellite launch, if you weren't such a tool you should have known,china launched way more foreign satellite than India for decade,though it's not so simple, india is more convenient politically for US/UK and their allies to cooperate,like nasa literally banned from working with china.
If I seeked respect from flag,last thing I'd pick is a flag if India. Nobody outside takes this state seriously .