India developing but long way to go ...

[N.Siddiqui]

23

Micronesia 84
23

Morocco 84
23

Nigeria 84
23

Pakistan 84
23

Panama 84
23

Paraguay 84

24

Libya 83
24

Oman 83
24

Papua New Guinea 83
24

Syria 83
24

Tunisia 83
25

Bangladesh 82
25

Dominican Republic 82
25

India 82
25

Lebanon 82

 

[Crixus]

surprisingly Israel is not in list while they have highest number of per capita nobel prizes @500 @DavidSling

WORLD RANKING OF COUNTRIES BY THEIR AVERAGE
Which country has the highest IQ? What is the average IQ of your country? Here is the average IQ of more than 80 countries.

These numbers came from a work carried out from 2002 to 2006 by Richard Lynn, a British Professor of Psychology, and Tatu Vanhanen, a Finnish Professor of Political Science, who conducted IQ studies in more than 80 countries.

Richard and Tatu argues that differences in national income are correlated with differences in the average national intelligence quotient (IQ). They further argue that differences in average national IQs constitute one important factor, but not the only one, contributing to differences in national wealth and rates of economic growth.



Rank Country IQ
1

Hong Kong 108
1

Singapore 108
2

South Korea 106
3

Japan 105
3

China 105
4

Taiwan 104
5

Italy 102
6

Iceland 101
6

Mongolia 101
6

Switzerland 101
7

Austria 100
7

Luxembourg 100
7

Netherlands 100
7

Norway 100
7

United Kingdom 100
8

Belgium 99
8

Canada 99
8

Estonia 99

 

[N.Siddiqui]

WORLD RANKING OF COUNTRIES BY THEIR AVERAGE
Which country has the highest IQ? What is the average IQ of your country? Here is the average IQ of more than 80 countries.

These numbers came from a work carried out from 2002 to 2006 by Richard Lynn, a British Professor of Psychology, and Tatu Vanhanen, a Finnish Professor of Political Science, who conducted IQ studies in more than 80 countries.

Richard and Tatu argues that differences in national income are correlated with differences in the average national intelligence quotient (IQ). They further argue that differences in average national IQs constitute one important factor, but not the only one, contributing to differences in national wealth and rates of economic growth.


So Pakistan has an IQ level of 84 and India an IQ level of 82, lower than Pakistan...

surprisingly Israel is not in list while they have highest number of per capita nobel prizes @500 @DavidSling

They must be in the list, have to delete quite a few because more than 20 images cannot be posted in an attempt here at PDF.

Check here....
https://iq-research.info/en/page/average-iq-by-country

 

[wiseone2]

when will you acknowledge this achievement??
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/child-sexual-abuse-top-5-countries-highest-rates-1436162
btw is Modigay why he left his wife so early?? why he didn't have kids?? is he impotent or something else?

You should ask Modi

 

[Bombaywalla]

so you are not going to leave this forum??

Firstly, LOL how old are you? And secondly, not until petty people like yourself stop bringing India into every damn aspect of your little lives... even opening threads about it for reasons we know all too well.

 

[prashantazazel]

The difference is the direction. Our educated class is progressive and forward looking. Yours is mainly religious and violent.

 

[N.Siddiqui]

where the members here are gone from India...

 

[gslv mk3]

where the members here are gone from India...

Only stupid telephone interview based surveys can rank Pakistan better than India & Somalia better than Sri Lanka.

http://worldhappiness.report/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2017/03/HR17.pdf

WORLD RANKING OF COUNTRIES BY THEIR AVERAGE

Rely on BS IQ studies while generating 1/200th of our scientific output.

https://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/ac/ido/oeip/taf/cst_utl.htm

 

[raj76]

@ito Not India has $400 billion, but In the previous week, the reserves had declined marginally by $11.5 million to $381.156 billion.

Pakistan’s foreign exchange reserves increased to $21.447 billion during the week ended July 7 from $21.367 billion a week ago.

The foreign exchange reserves held by the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) rose $54 million to $16.197 billion as compared to $16.143 billion during the previous week. The foreign exchange reserves of commercial banks increased to $5.250 billion as compared to $5.224 billion in the preceding week.

LOL who are u fooling u r most of the reserves are loans and u r government is printing money like crazy and trying to control the pakistani rs price very soon u will seepakistani rs shooting as well as inflation and the vicious cycle will eat up all the forex reserve of pakistan

imports up exports down remittence down

your economist

 

[gslv mk3]

Meanwhile, in the real world...

 

[N.Siddiqui]

Only stupid telephone interviews can rank Pakistan better than India & Somalia better than Sri Lanka.

http://worldhappiness.report/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2017/03/HR17.pdf



Rely on BS IQ studies while generating 1/200th of our scientific output.

https://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/ac/ido/oeip/taf/cst_utl.htm

I think this is because of the fault lines in India related to

-Unequal distribution of wealth, India ranks second after Russia.

- Inequality due to caste and creed, chances of 250 million Dalits being happy is very low.

- Caste system is a huge impediment for equality in India, everyone knew about it.

-India has more multidimensional poverty than Pakistan.

- Different regions and linguistic differences, religious differences and hence hatred is more in India...like chances of Keralites or Tamils hating north Indians is real and present.

- The current Pattidars Patel protest for Quotas is one instance.


....many more issues here in India.

 

[raj76]

So what!!They beat USA in Happiness index & also less ignorant than India..Who needs HDI FDI GDP!!

it could also mean that they can lie to themselves

 

[gslv mk3]

I think this is because of the fault lines in India related to

-Unequal distribution of wealth, India ranks second after Russia.

- Inequality due to caste and creed, chances of 250 million Dalits being happy is very low.

- Caste system is a huge impediment for equality in India, everyone knew about it.

-India has more multidimensional poverty than Pakistan.

- Different regions and linguistic differences, religious differences and hence hatred is more in India...like chances of Keralites or Tamils hating north Indians is real and present.

- The current Pattidars Patel protest for Quotas is one instance.


....many more issues here in India.

Meh...more BS.

What is the original source of the data for Figure 2.2? How are the rankings calculated?
The rankings in figure 2.2 use data that come from the Gallup World Poll (for more information see the Gallup World Poll methodology). The rankings are based on answers to the main life evaluation question asked in the poll. This is called the Cantril ladder: it asks respondents to think of a ladder, with the best possible life for them being a 10, and the worst possible life being a 0. They are then asked to rate their own current lives on that 0 to 10 scale.

The rankings are from nationally representative samples, for the years 2014-2016. They are based entirely on the survey scores, using the Gallup weights to make the estimates representative. The sub-bars show the estimated extent to which each of six factors – levels of GDP, life expectancy, generosity, social support, freedom, and corruption – contribute to making life evaluations higher in each country than they are in Dystopia, a hypothetical country that has values equal to the world’s lowest national averages for each of the six factors (see FAQs: What is Dystopia?). They have no impact on the total score reported for each country, but instead are just a way of explaining for each country the implications of the model estimated in Table 2.1. People often ask why some countries rank higher than others – the sub-bars (including the residuals, which show what is not explained) are an attempt to provide an answer to that question.

What is your sample size for figure 2.2?
We use the most recent years in order to provide an up-to-date measure, and to measure changes over time. We combine data from the years 2014-2016 to make the sample size large enough to reduce the random sampling errors. (The horizontal lines at the right-hand end of each of the main bars show the 95% confidence interval for the estimate.) The typical annual sample is 1,000 people. So if a country had surveys in each year, then the sample size would be 3,000 people. However, there are many countries that have not had annual surveys. If a country was not surveyed in any year between 2014 and 2016, we use their 2013 surveys if available; there are only 1 such country out of a total of 155. In no case do we go further back than 2013. Tables 1-3 of the online statistical appendix show the sample size for each country in each year.

http://worldhappiness.report/faq/

And this is supposed to be more 'credible' than hard data based HDI.

 

[N.Siddiqui]

Meh...more BS.

What is the original source of the data for Figure 2.2? How are the rankings calculated?
The rankings in figure 2.2 use data that come from the Gallup World Poll (for more information see the Gallup World Poll methodology). The rankings are based on answers to the main life evaluation question asked in the poll. This is called the Cantril ladder: it asks respondents to think of a ladder, with the best possible life for them being a 10, and the worst possible life being a 0. They are then asked to rate their own current lives on that 0 to 10 scale.

The rankings are from nationally representative samples, for the years 2014-2016. They are based entirely on the survey scores, using the Gallup weights to make the estimates representative. The sub-bars show the estimated extent to which each of six factors – levels of GDP, life expectancy, generosity, social support, freedom, and corruption – contribute to making life evaluations higher in each country than they are in Dystopia, a hypothetical country that has values equal to the world’s lowest national averages for each of the six factors (see FAQs: What is Dystopia?). They have no impact on the total score reported for each country, but instead are just a way of explaining for each country the implications of the model estimated in Table 2.1. People often ask why some countries rank higher than others – the sub-bars (including the residuals, which show what is not explained) are an attempt to provide an answer to that question.

What is your sample size for figure 2.2?
We use the most recent years in order to provide an up-to-date measure, and to measure changes over time. We combine data from the years 2014-2016 to make the sample size large enough to reduce the random sampling errors. (The horizontal lines at the right-hand end of each of the main bars show the 95% confidence interval for the estimate.) The typical annual sample is 1,000 people. So if a country had surveys in each year, then the sample size would be 3,000 people. However, there are many countries that have not had annual surveys. If a country was not surveyed in any year between 2014 and 2016, we use their 2013 surveys if available; there are only 1 such country out of a total of 155. In no case do we go further back than 2013. Tables 1-3 of the online statistical appendix show the sample size for each country in each year.

http://worldhappiness.report/faq/

And this is supposed to be more 'credible' than hard data based HDI.

How can you deny this....every Indian knew about these real facts about India. If you deny this you are denying the existence of 250 million Dalits in India, this is an Indian government figure, so are the other facts and figures.

-Unequal distribution of wealth, India ranks second after Russia.

- Inequality due to caste and creed, chances of 250 million Dalits being happy is very low.

- Caste system is a huge impediment for equality in India, everyone knew about it.

-India has more multidimensional poverty than Pakistan.

- Different regions and linguistic differences, religious differences and hence hatred is more in India...like chances of Keralites or Tamils hating north Indians is real and present.

- The current Pattidars Patel protest for Quotas is one instance.


....many more issues here in India.

 

[gslv mk3]

How can you deny this....every Indian knew about these real fact about India. If you deny this you are denying the existence of 250 million Dalits in India, this is an Indian government figure, so are the other facts and figures..

In real, hard data based HDI, India leads.

In telephone survey based Global Happiness index, which ranks Nicaragua ahead of South Korea & Somalia ahead of Sri Lanka, Pakistan wins hands down. It's not like a survey with a sample set of 1000 people in a country of 1.3 billion is going to suffer any sort of sampling bias...oh wait