What's new

In a shame for India, only 1.8% turnout recorded in sham elections in Occupied Kashmir

Wow all of a sudden 1.8 % simply jumped to 35.1% within two replies. Well that in itself is a great achievement. LOL :yahoo::yahoo::yahoo:
i think there is reading comprehending issue with you..
go and read the OP article again..
 
.
Our country our rules. Now be happy with what you have and let us keep what we have and coexist happily. :-)

What you have doesn't belong to you.

So we would give your suggestion a pass.
 
.
i think there is reading comprehending issue with you..
go and read the OP article again..

No I don't have any comprehension, rather does the title of the article justify the content inside the article ??? Be honest and reply. It's not just 1.8% voting recorded as per the title, it's pure incomplete fact for local conception. LOL :p:

Agreed the turnout was too low compared to previous elections. But given the current political situation, that was expected.
 
.
No I don't have any comprehension, rather does the title of the article justify the content inside the article ??? Be honest and reply. It's not just 1.8% voting recorded as per the title, it's pure incomplete fact for local conception. LOL :p:
again you only read the title not the whole article and its your mistake not mine..
 
.
The people of Kashmir rejected hindustan once again. By the time the next election comes by, Kashmir will be awash with the blood of the oppressors.
 
.
again you only read the title not the whole article and its your mistake not mine..

The source itself is more than enough for me to trash the whole article. FYI, the total percentage of votes being poled was around 36%, which ofcourse is far to low compared to previous times. But things will change by general elections next year, be patient and watch, it just a matter of few months. :-)
 
.
The people of Kashmir rejected hindustan once again. By the time the next election comes by, Kashmir will be awash with the blood of the oppressors.
We are conducting elections. If they reject it they are the ones who will be impacted.
 
.
it was they who protect your so-called territorial integrity in 1965 war..
if they would have sided with Pakistan in 1965 war, more than 2/3 of Kashmir would have be in control of Pakistan.
but now young generation would have been cursing their forefathers for believing in indian promises in 1965.
It actually has to do with the fact that those in the border areas are pro Indian. The support for Pak is only in the Valley.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom