This? This is your edit? Seriously? Even after I posted that video and quoted everything he has said multiple times, he still sympathises with them because he is a pathan?
Obama says he is against Boko Haram but he is black, therefore he sympathises with Boko Haram (also black). See how stupid that sounds? Thats the logic you are using right now.
Also, Imran Khan isn't a pathan. He is from Mianwali (not exactly pathan)
I was talking about your international reputation. Nothing to do with Pakistan's 'tolerance towards rapists', or India's for that matter.
No but the powerful world means USA and all its stooges, which is basically most of the west. India plays its cards better than Pakistan but don't pretend India doesn't get used.
And what do you mean by China and Russia exist in your world?? Pakistan and China have a very good alliance, China exists in Pakistan's world too, you make absolutely zero sense. As for Russia, what about it? Russia opposed US action in Syria, look what's happening there. And Russia is not even relevant to the discussion. None of your replies is relevant to any of my arguments.
I say "Imran Khan is not a terrorist sympathiser" and give a good amount of proof to back my claim, you reply with a bunch of unrelated stuff and "Imran Khan is Pathan so he is a terrorist sympathiser".
View attachment 124528