And here I thought you are proving my point.
Anyways let’s give it another turn, I have been going through different perspectives on this debacle. Those perspective are different point of views to analyse a situation and they are political, economical, trade, growth, inflation, spiritual, religious, domestic and international relations, including military’s perspective on different aspects.
I have been talking about a mix of spiritual-religious perception with you but I put forward only IK in Pakistan’s case The other side of the coin is Bajwa. Both were in driving seat of leading Pakistan. A trait of Bajwa was that he is a cruel and hard hearted man. Some of his actions in decision making since becoming COAS that I know of, have been cruel. Less occurred before extension, a bit more occurred after extension. Both IK and Bajwa had to go, but only one came back, which is IK. Bajwa can never come back In power , one of the reasons being he took off the uniform and that’s it. That was his pathway and he has had been sidelined from power in another way than IK. While few government officials confirm that IK wasn’t corrupt as PM, maybe that is his salvation that doors of power remain an opportunity for him. He has to mend his ways to get back that opportunity and hold onto it.
