Imran Khan Presents his Resolution , part of Election Campaign

[Ssan]

I don't answer personal questions but anyone willing to vote under incompetent ECP, a biased caretaker setup and a flawed electoral system is only contributing to the mess and taking unwarranted responsibility.

Democracies vote for policies not a popular contest.

Which party’s policies do you find yourself aligning with more closely?

Assume we had the same political parties but a competent ECP under a neutral caretaker and secure electoral system, who would you find yourself voting for?

 

[El Sidd]

Which party’s policies do you find yourself aligning with more closely?

Assume we had the same political parties but a competent ECP under a neutral caretaker and secure electoral system, who would you find yourself voting for?

All of these parties have carbon copy mandates.

There is absolutely no difference, it's the same old roti kapra makaan, 3 things Pakistanis who are overwhelmingly conservative and religious attribute to God.

Cunningly the masses also believe and practice in the concept of might is right and hence continue to vote for the local Badmash over someone who may come close to fulfilling qualification criteria laid down by the constitution itself.

Principally, democracy is all about strengthening the weak over the established. So if put a gun on the head, i will choose to vote for the person in the constituency whose least likely to win.

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

I for one am quite satisfied with the important agenda rolled out by Honorable Imran Khan

• Focus on the poor people in society and provide them support
• Also the implementation of Human Rights Law for Servants great initiative

Too often in Pakistani Society the poor servants are asked to work 16 hours a day
And last one to eat and that too with minimum wage

 

[Ssan]

All of these parties have carbon copy mandates.

There is absolutely no difference, it's the same old roti kapra makaan, 3 things Pakistanis who are overwhelmingly conservative and religious attribute to God.

Cunningly the masses also believe and practice in the concept of might is right and hence continue to vote for the local Badmash over someone who may come close to fulfilling qualification criteria laid down by the constitution itself.

Principally, democracy is all about strengthening the weak over the established. So if put a gun on the head, i will choose to vote for the person in the constituency whose least likely to win.

Do you really think that a party like JI is the same as say PPP?

What is your take on the objectives resolution? From your reply, it seems you don’t tilt left?

 

[El Sidd]

Do you really think that a party like JI is the same as say PPP?

What is your take on the objectives resolution? From your reply, it seems you don’t tilt left?

Yes they are the same.

The objective resolution is a forgotten preamble

 

[Enigma SIG]

Democracies vote for policies not a popular contest.

Macron introduced a policy only to be shown what democracy is.

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1641021204680130561

 

[Signalian]

With respect, I highly disagree.

This importance that has been given to IK is not from PTI and its followers, its from those that oppose him.

PTI was to be a baseline, a foundation for a counter-culture party that pushed against the dynasties that have traditionally ruled Pakistan. The mistake that the anti-PTI people make is that they treat PTI as just another dynastic political party, which makes zero sense.

IK didn't get arrogant, his opponents just mischaracterized him and his party.

He will come back to power not because he was amazing, but because his opponents were and are corrupt and incompetent. If he were to complete his term, he would have either won with a smaller number of seats, or had lost.

His opponents in their continued incompetence have guaranteed a victory for Imran Khan. He snatched victory from the jaws of near certain defeat.

We can agree to disagree.

Maybe Pakistan Army is stronger than Turkish Army which is why Erdogan remained while IK had been sidelined. Then again, both Muslim armies are supported by God and both Muslim leaders are supporter by God, however maybe Pakistan Army is above God while Turkish Army is not, so Pakistan Army always get what they want, even in politics as God fails probably at that time.

The man became arrogance to a level which suits God only, he was sidelined after that, not by Pakistan Army though.

 

[Olympus81]

The Pakistani Army had it coming for their decades of excesses. RCO and IK was just a matter of being at the right place and time.

3.5 years of his last tenure was far from perfect with alot goods and alot of bloopers, however the majority will elect him as compared to the crooks establishment brought.

 

[Zhukov]

Just privatise all state owned businesses. Stop listening to propaganda that those are our National "Assete". Those are just used for political hirings at lower levels and give jobs to retired Generals and Beurocrats. All those Aholes dont know jack about running enterprises hence poor performance, and cheery in top, the institute runs of Public funds.

Sale those dead trucks to some ome who can run them. No need for govt to hold on to even 40%. Generals, Beurocrats and politicians should Not have 1% leverage on any business in their official capacity.

Govt should only run and focus administrative institutions to run the state.

But people are so knee deep in decades old propaganda "Hamara qomi sarmaya hai ham kesey bech den" BC sarey retired officer wahan bharti, Sare MNAs MPAs ki syasi bhartian wahan hotin. Qomi Sarmaya my foot

 

[S.Y.A]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1641021204680130561

the question is how will he do all of this? and how will he clean up the bureaucracy? how will he end the wadera system? how will he ensure that his policies are followed by provinces where his govt doesnt exist (18th amendment is a disaster)?

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

Great work being done by Lawyers

 

[That Guy]

We can agree to disagree.

Maybe Pakistan Army is stronger than Turkish Army which is why Erdogan remained while IK had been sidelined. Then again, both Muslim armies are supported by God and both Muslim leaders are supporter by God, however maybe Pakistan Army is above God while Turkish Army is not, so Pakistan Army always get what they want, even in politics as God fails probably at that time.

The man became arrogance to a level which suits God only, he was sidelined after that, not by Pakistan Army though.

I highly disagree again, but yeah let's just leave it here, as I'd be repeating myself.

Just an FYI, you're kinda proving my point.

 

[imadul]

That is populist agenda, the most important thing is what his plan to solve Pakistan financial and industry problem ?

Populist agenda can wait, now what his economic plan ?

I dont see Indonesian economist show populist agenda during our 1997- 1999 financial crisis, what I see they were making people swallow hard pill like increasing interest rate very hight and decreasing fuel subsidy, decreasing defense budget and decreasing budget deficit ( less spending )

Leader gives main objects as he is not an economist. It will be the job of his economic team to achieve the goals.
Achieving goals will require changes in micro/macro economics policies.
In Pakistan main thing is cultural change in economic policy; how to direct opportunities to poor and raise their living standards.
That does not mean LSME will be ignored.

 

[CodeforFood]

As another has said, populist agenda and nothing more.

There's still a policy necessary for:

• economics
  • land reform
  • identification of focus industries in 5/10 year proposals
  • fiscal deficits
  • identification of "future cities", these need to be existing locations that can be transformed into self-sustaining urban centers. LAH/ISB/PSH/KHI are no longer viable.
    • vertical cities with building codes (videos of damage from last week's earthquake is beyond condemnation)
• destruction of establishment, (self explanatory)
• reformation of bureaucracy/judiciary/military
  • clear cut removal of senior members
  • crackdown on corruption
  • removal of perks
  • 21th century military
    • bring out the drones
    • value of soldier's life, no more "i value death more than you value life" mottos. The purpose of a soldier is to kill his enemy and make him die for his cause.
  • accountability
    • no more post changes in x months
    • individuals develop their desired career development no more xx grade officer from fbr goes to police etc.
• expansion of education
  • quality education
  • creation of technical schools
  • creation of night schools for laboring children
  • introduction of civics
• reformation of NAB
• reformation of healthcare
  • expansion of seats, with more scholarships
  • each student is committed to X years in public
  • top students are directed to research opportunities
• governance
  • empowered local governments
  • expansion of public parks

Populist policies don't bring about development. Dedicated direction does.


EDIT: I forgot PTI's internal policies

• No more electables
• Development of organic internal leadership
• Policy of no more than X members from a family in PTI politics (oldest living relatives down to youngest living members)
• Heavily monitored internal corruption prevention by politicians
• Accountability. Each Parliamentarian is responsible for their constituency's development. Low development = new parliamentarian on ticket.

the things you are talking about can be taken as initiation but cannot be completed in single term. I believe what pti is giving as manifesto is what they think they can deliver. We always want to solve the big things that are not immediately solveable. We should definitely set the directions towards it but not tie it with something that can be tangibly promised to be delivered...