If there is a war between China - Viet Nam in SCS

[beijingwalker]

Nah no way to re-educate brainwashed chinese. We don't even care what the hell do you think

we don't care what you think either,no love lost.

 

[beijingwalker]

Nah no way to re-educate brainwashed chinese. We don't even care what the hell do you think

we don't care what you think either,no love lost.

 

[Đảo Bạch Long Vỹ]

We're still laughing about your "1904 Chinese Map" which you say didn't contain Spartley and Xisha. The map had Pingyin on it. You do know that Pingyin was only created in 1958 by the government to standardize the pronounciations across the country right? Unless you imply that we're so advanced that we can time travel, we'll laugh at your evidence some more.

We can litterally sink your entire navy within a matter of hours should you decide to engage us in SCS.

Your gov proclaimed the "pinyin" in 1958, but Westerners had used Latin words to transcript Chinese territory for a long time. And your 1904 map had a big help from Westerners.

One example:
- Traité élémentaire de géographie: contenant un abrégé méthodique du Précis de la géographie universelle en huit volumes (volume 2), Paris, 1831, page 221:
"A une egale distance de la cote de Cochinchine et de l'ile d'Hai-nan, l'archipel de Paracels est une dependance de l'empire d'Annam"

Traité élémentaire de géographie: contenant un abrégé méthodique de Précis ... - Conrad Malte-Brun - Google Books

- Or you can check this book: Nuovo dizionario geografico universale statistico-storico-commerciale, Venezia, 1831, page 680:
Nuovo dizionario geografico universale statistico-storico-commerciale ... - Google Sách

BTW there are many many maps from your gov before 193x which also don't have Paracel and Spartly:
http://www.defence.pk/forums/china-...lippines-if-china-attacks-11.html#post3244021
http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-...tly-not-chinese-territory-24.html#post3248733
http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-...tly-not-chinese-territory-24.html#post3248736

1 or 2 maps isn't a problem. But so many maps is a different story

 

[S10]

When US wake up, china is collapsing

Even in the unlikely event we do, we'll make sure to wipe you off the map with nuclear weapons first.

 

[EastSea]

Then you woke up from your wet dream.

When US wake up, china is collapsing

 

[Đảo Bạch Long Vỹ]

we don't care what you think either,no love lost.

Who need you to care about my thinking?
Why you just cut the most part of my comment? I'm successful in doing what I want, and you aren't, that's the point

Nah no way to re-educate brainwashed chinese. We don't even care what the hell do you think, just let you think what you want. We just want to make you chinese show off your true aggressive image of invaders in international forums, and I have to say that it's really successful here.

Even in the unlikely event we do, we'll make sure to wipe you off the map with nuclear weapons first.

It's not Civilization V so you can't just nuke everyone
This is the real world, wake up

 

[EastSea]

Even in the unlikely event we do, we'll make sure to wipe you off the map with nuclear weapons first.

You will disappeared, no thing to do first, like you Manchu boy, you lost your identity, no person more in the world.

 

[S10]

You will disappeared, no thing to do first, like you Manchu boy, you lost your identity, no person more in the world.

Heh little Viet monkeys talking about taking on China is just about the funniest thing in the world. Almost as funny as your sailors screaming before they died in 1988.

Who need you to care about my thinking?
Why you just cut the most part of my comment? I'm successful in doing what I want, and you aren't, that's the point

It's not Civilization V so you can't just nuke everyone
This is the real world, wake up

Real world says Vietnam will be beaten to a pulp if it goes to war with China. You're right this isn't civilization V and your monkey civilization won't stand a chance.

 

[Đảo Bạch Long Vỹ]

Heh little Viet monkeys talking about taking on China is just about the funniest thing in the world. Almost as funny as your sailors screaming before they died in 1988.

To be more accurate, military engineers.
They died in defending their Motherland, such glorious deaths. Much more better than some living objects that go and invade everywhere.

Real world says Vietnam will be beaten to a pulp if it goes to war with China. You're right this isn't civilization V and your monkey civilization won't stand a chance.

OK, Ah Q won't harm anyone. Just keep your imagination about nuking everyone like Civilization V

 

[S10]

To be more accurate, military engineers.
They died in defending their Motherland, such glorious deaths. Much more better than some living objects that go and invade everywhere.

They died trying to steal our islands, and died like bunch of screaming thieves.

 

[Đảo Bạch Long Vỹ]

They died trying to steal our islands, and died like bunch of screaming thieves.

"Your" islands? So just tell me about the base of your buffalo's tongue claim

1) Your argument about "2000-year-old claim" is ridiculous, you said you "discovered" those islands, but in fact the "discovery" has nothing to do with sovereignty. Look at Colombo and his country, Spain.

2) We have a strong base of evidences to prove that we had sovereignty over those islands before 18th-19th century.
http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-...tly-not-chinese-territory-13.html#post3237586
http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-...tly-not-chinese-territory-25.html#post3249921



3) There are many many maps from your gov before 193x which also don't have Paracel and Spartly:
http://www.defence.pk/forums/china-...lippines-if-china-attacks-11.html#post3244021
http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-...tly-not-chinese-territory-24.html#post3248733
http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-...tly-not-chinese-territory-24.html#post3248736

1 or 2 maps isn't a problem. But so many maps is a different story [/QUOTE]


4) Vietnam and Philippines have been asked you to go to international court, but you always avoid. Why? You know that you don't have evidence, so if you go there, you will loose. End of story

In conclusion, they have never be your islands, you just came and invaded them in 1956, 1974, 1988. So China is the thief, the robber, the bully.

 

[S10]

"Your" islands? So just tell me about the base of your buffalo's tongue claim

1) Your argument about "2000-year-old claim" is ridiculous, you said you "discovered" those islands, but in fact the "discovery" has nothing to do with sovereignty. Look at Colombo and his country, Spain.

2) We have a strong base of evidences to prove that we had sovereignty over those islands before 18th-19th century.
http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-...tly-not-chinese-territory-13.html#post3237586
http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-...tly-not-chinese-territory-25.html#post3249921



3) There are many many maps from your gov before 193x which also don't have Paracel and Spartly:
http://www.defence.pk/forums/china-...lippines-if-china-attacks-11.html#post3244021
http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-...tly-not-chinese-territory-24.html#post3248733
http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-...tly-not-chinese-territory-24.html#post3248736

1 or 2 maps isn't a problem. But so many maps is a different story

LOL, you little Viets are retarded as hell. Your so called "1904 Map" has Pingyin on it, which wasn't invented until 1958. That means you forged the map like little thieves that you are. Here is a little video to celebrate your thieves screaming before they died:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ihYFyn6BXoM

Turn up the volume and you can hear the monkeys dying.

 

[Đảo Bạch Long Vỹ]

LOL, you little Viets are retarded as hell. Your so called "1904 Map" has Pingyin on it, which wasn't invented until 1958. That means you forged the map like little thieves that you are.

Y U NO READ?
In Today 11:55 AM, I said:

Your gov proclaimed the "pinyin" in 1958, but Westerners had used Latin words to transcript Chinese territory for a long time. And your 1904 map had a big help from Westerners.

One example:
- Traité élémentaire de géographie: contenant un abrégé méthodique du Précis de la géographie universelle en huit volumes (volume 2), Paris, 1831, page 221:
"A une egale distance de la cote de Cochinchine et de l'ile d'Hai-nan, l'archipel de Paracels est une dependance de l'empire d'Annam"

Traité élémentaire de géographie: contenant un abrégé méthodique de Précis ... - Conrad Malte-Brun - Google Books

- Or you can check this book: Nuovo dizionario geografico universale statistico-storico-commerciale, Venezia, 1831, page 680:
Nuovo dizionario geografico universale statistico-storico-commerciale ... - Google Sách

BTW there are many many maps from your gov before 193x which also don't have Paracel and Spartly:
http://www.defence.pk/forums/china-...lippines-if-china-attacks-11.html#post3244021
http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-...tly-not-chinese-territory-24.html#post3248733
http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-...tly-not-chinese-territory-24.html#post3248736

1 or 2 maps isn't a problem. But so many maps is a different story

Here is a little video to celebrate your thieves screaming before they died:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ihYFyn6BXoM

Turn up the volume and you can hear the monkeys dying.

Salute Heroes of the Motherland!

China´s massacre in Spratly islands [real footage 1988] - YouTube

And you can just avoid my points in proving Vietnamese sovereignty and refusing chinese sovereignty, it means that you chinese have no legal sovereignty over those 2 islands. Then China is a thief, a robber, a bully, a threat to the peace of the world.

"Your" islands? So just tell me about the base of your buffalo's tongue claim

1) Your argument about "2000-year-old claim" is ridiculous, you said you "discovered" those islands, but in fact the "discovery" has nothing to do with sovereignty. Look at Colombo and his country, Spain.

2) We have a strong base of evidences to prove that we had sovereignty over those islands before 18th-19th century.
http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-...tly-not-chinese-territory-13.html#post3237586
http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-...tly-not-chinese-territory-25.html#post3249921



3) There are many many maps from your gov before 193x which also don't have Paracel and Spartly:
http://www.defence.pk/forums/china-...lippines-if-china-attacks-11.html#post3244021
http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-...tly-not-chinese-territory-24.html#post3248733
http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-...tly-not-chinese-territory-24.html#post3248736

1 or 2 maps isn't a problem. But so many maps is a different story


4) Vietnam and Philippines have been asked you to go to international court, but you always avoid. Why? You know that you don't have evidence, so if you go there, you will loose. End of story

In conclusion, they have never be your islands, you just came and invaded them in 1956, 1974, 1988. So China is the thief, the robber, the bully.

 

[EastSea]

Heh little Viet monkeys talking about taking on China is just about the funniest thing in the world. Almost as funny as your sailors screaming before they died in 1988.


Real world says Vietnam will be beaten to a pulp if it goes to war with China. You're right this isn't civilization V and your monkey civilization won't stand a chance.

Tibetans, Ujigurs can protest for their Independence, but you Manchu boy lost your identity, trolling about such idiot thing no related to you Manchuria, funniest thing in the world that you like robe islands of other neighbors, but yourself you loast your homeland.

Chinese ship ran awy like mad dog now.

 

[dunhill]

To whom may loves to get spank again.

Reviews in 1979 in English caption:


A Self Humiliation For China (China-Vietnam War 1979) - YouTube